1. When was thinning of the ozone over the Antarctic first verified?
2010
1985
1974
1960
2. Which of the following is part of the environment experienced by humans?
Physical factors
Chemical factors
Cultural factors
All of the above
3. Which of the following is essential to any scientific investigation?
Field observations
Experiments
A hypothesis
Modeling
4. A theory, as used by scientists, is best described by which one of the following?
An idea that may have no support by research
An explanation for a natural phenomenon, widely supported by research results
A tentative answer to a research question
A proven idea with no uncertainty remaining
5. Which one of the following is not a form of research misconduct?
Not ordering sufficient research supplies for a particular experiment
Making up data to yield more interesting research
Copying the work of others and claiming it as your own
Altering the calibration of scientific instruments to produce false positive readings
6. When were some of the earliest observations of human environmental impact recorded in writing?
10,000 years ago
Over 2,000 years ago
In the 1700s
In the 1960s
7. What eventually scuttled Benjamin Franklin’s attempts to have the tanneries moved from the center of Philadelphia?
A lack of interest by the majority of Philadelphians living near the tanneries
The installation of pollution-
The belief that the odors of the tanneries were a source of good health
Entrenched economic and political interests supporting the tanneries
8. What did Rachel Carson advise regarding the use of chemical pesticides?
Total banning of chemical pesticides in the United States
Total banning of chemical pesticides around the world, including in the United States
Caution in the use of chemical pesticides
Greater use of chemical pesticides, particularly for control of significant agricultural pests
9. Which of the following is the most inclusive ethical perspective on the environment?
Anthropocentric ethics
Biocentric ethics
Ecocentric ethics
Research ethics
10. Which of the following best describes environmental science?
A scientific discipline concerned with controlling pollution
An interdisciplinary field that reaches beyond the natural sciences to address practical environmental problems
The study of the relationships between organisms and the environment
A largely political field concerned mainly with controlling human population growth
Critical Analysis
1. Scientists once thought they were on a quest to discover the absolute unchanging rules governing natural phenomena. Increasingly, scientists in every discipline have had to come to terms with the concept of uncertainty, a concept that even Albert Einstein had difficulty accepting. What are some of the implications of the inability of science to eliminate uncertainty entirely, particularly in regard to environmental issues, such as ozone thinning, involving great risks to harm human populations and with significant potential economic consequences following regulation?
2. Exploring nature and solving complex problems are often important motivations for scientists choosing a career path. For those successful in obtaining a position in scientific research, what responsibilities come with the privilege of working in this highly competitive field?
3. Awareness of human environmental impact was first recorded in ancient China and Greece, and that awareness has only increased over time, with the environment in the news nearly every day. What factors have contributed to the apparent increase in impact on the environment by humans? Do these contributory factors suggest potential ways to reduce environmental harm?
4. Figure 1.24 summarizes the components of the ecological footprint. If you were to propose an alternative measure of ecological footprint, what components would you choose? If you conclude that the existing ecological footprint index is the best one, without modification, justify its focus.
5. Why does environmental science include so many areas of thought and expertise in its domain? What are the relative roles played by the natural and applied sciences versus the social sciences and humanities in addressing environmental issues? Can we ignore the humanities and social sciences and just get on with the solving of environmental problems with the tools of the natural and applied sciences?