7.5 Common farming, grazing, and forestry practices deplete soils

In his 2005 best-selling book Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed, Jared Diamond describes how soil depletion has contributed to the fall of ancient civilizations, such as the Maya in Central America. Today, damage to soils, either through depletion of nutrients or physical loss of soil, continues to be a major global environmental concern (Figure 7.12).

POOR AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE AND DROUGHT CREATED THE DUST BOWL
image
FIGURE 7.12 Dust (essentially blowing topsoil) from this 1930s environmental disaster filled the air in communities as far away from the Great Plains as New York City and set millions of refugees in motion seeking a better life across the continent.
(NRCS/ USDA)

Soil Loss by Erosion

200

Erosion is a natural land-forming process that moves soil from one place to another. However, human activities can accelerate it—to devastating effect. In undisturbed temperate forest, soils are formed at a rate of about 1 ton per hectare per year, which is 100 to 1,000 times greater than the natural erosion rate. However, when people cut forests or churn up soils during agriculture or road-building, rates of soil loss skyrocket. Over the past 150 years, erosion has removed more than 50% of the topsoil from the prairies of Iowa, which include some of the most productive farmland in North America. Overall, soil losses in North America and Europe average approximately 17 metric tons per hectare (ha) per year. Soil losses in the croplands of South America, Asia, and Africa are even greater, around 30 to 40 tons per hectare annually.

image

How might studies of undisturbed natural ecosystems help design sustainable agricultural systems?

Losses of topsoil to erosion can be broken down into losses of mineral particles, organic matter, or nutrients. In one landmark 1992 study, Cornell University researchers reported that the 17 metric tons of topsoil lost per hectare in the United States contain an average of approximately 14.5 metric tons of mineral soil, 2 metric tons of organic matter, and nearly 0.5 metric ton of inorganic nutrients (Figure 7.13).

SOIL EROSION REMOVES MINERAL SOIL, ORGANIC MATTER, AND INORGANIC NUTRIENTS
image
FIGURE 7.13 The average loss of soil on each hectare of agricultural land in the United States as a result of erosion amounts to 17 metric tons annually. (Data from Pimentel et al., 1992)

Those nutrients include potassium, phosphorus, and nitrogen, which are critical to agriculture and to maintaining soil fertility. Most replacement potassium and phosphorus comes from mining activities, which have a significant impact on the environment and require substantial amounts of fossil fuels. In contrast, replacement nitrogen is derived from the atmosphere in a process that also requires substantial use of fossil fuels (through industrial synthesis). The losses of soil organic matter can also reduce farm productivity because the crumblike structure of soil organic matter is key to promoting the infiltration of water, aeration, retention of nutrients, and resistance to erosion.

Conventional-Tillage Agriculture

conventional-tillage agriculture Tilling a field to break up soil clumps and smooth the soil surface before planting, as well as weeding using specialized machinery.

Soil erosion is a potential problem associated with farming and ranching, and each has unique challenges. Conventional-tillage agriculture involves tilling a field to break up soil clumps and smooth the soil surface before planting, as well as weeding using specialized machinery. Although conventional tillage can be very effective for seeding crops and controlling weeds, it exposes large areas of bare soil to wind and water, often resulting in erosion of topsoil (Figure 7.14).

CONVENTIONAL-TILLAGE AGRICULTURE EXPOSES BARE SOIL TO EROSIVE FORCES
image
FIGURE 7.14 Intensive annual cultivation, which is central to conventional-tillage agriculture, can result in massive soil losses through erosion by both wind and water.
(USDA Media by Lance Cheung)

Overgrazing of Rangelands and Desertification

Grazing by livestock causes erosion in the same way as conventional tillage, by reducing plant cover and disturbing topsoil. Livestock are generally heavy animals that consume a lot of plant material and compress soils with their hooves. Overgrazed rangelands may lose up to 100 tons of soil per hectare per year. Rangelands in hot, dry regions are particularly sensitive to erosion because they naturally support sparse plant cover, which can be easily overgrazed. Severe erosion can occur during torrential rains and flash floods (Figure 7.15).

OVERGRAZING HAS RESULTED IN HIGH RATES OF EROSION ON MANY RANGELANDS
image
FIGURE 7.15 The formation of gullies, such as the one shown here on an overgrazed pasture in southern Iowa, is one of the most severe forms of erosion.
(Lynn Betts/USDA)

desertification A process of degradation of once fertile lands to a desertlike condition of reduced plant cover and primary production.

The impacts of overgrazing in arid and semiarid rangelands commonly lead to desertification, a process of degradation of once fertile lands to a desertlike condition of reduced plant cover and primary production. Desertification is a major problem in central Asia, much of China, and of northern Africa, particularly in the Sahel region (Figure 7.16).

OVERGRAZING HAS CONTRIBUTED TO DESERTIFICATION
image
FIGURE 7.16 Semiarid grazing lands around the world have been converted to desertlike ecosystems through desertification, a process that is increasing the extent of low-production wastelands. The contribution of livestock to desertification of the Sahel region of northern Africa, pictured here, is well studied.
(Mark Edwards/stillpictures/Aurora Photos)

201

Think About It

  1. How might a soil profile on a farm in a region that would naturally support either temperate grassland (or temperate forest) show evidence of soil erosion? (See Figure 7.6.)

  2. Why are the soils of mountain landscapes more subject to erosion? (Hint: What force besides water and wind power is especially influential in mountain landscapes?)

  3. Why haven’t the soils of the tundra and taiga biomes been subject to higher levels of erosion, compared with the soils of other biomes, at least to this point in their history?