8.5 Dams and river regulation have decimated migratory fish populations

241

Building dams on rivers can stabilize water supply and protect people and infrastructure from flooding. However, dam construction can also displace human populations dependent on rich floodplain resources, forcing them to make a living in less productive environments. Dam construction has many benefits and costs, but here we focus on how river modification by dams threatens populations of commercially important migratory fish, especially salmon.

The Columbia River

image

How do you think we should weigh the relative environmental costs against the economic benefits of dams?

In the early 19th century, some 8 to 10 million adult salmon would swim up the Columbia River every year to spawn in the river and its tributaries. But the construction of over 100 large hydroelectric dams converted the once large, free-flowing river to a series of long reservoirs (Figure 8.14). Salmon no longer have access to an estimated 45% of their historic spawning areas. Even where salmon can get around dams through fish ladders—constructed stair-steps of water that allow a fish to swim over a dam—they face severe environmental challenges, including migrating through lakes rather than along a river and returning to degraded habitat. Because of population declines following damming, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has designated most of the salmon populations in the Columbia River system as threatened or endangered.

A FREE-FLOWING RIVER NO MORE
image
FIGURE 8.14 This map shows the locations of major dams on the lower Columbia River system, including one of the Columbia River’s main tributaries, the Snake River. Hydroelectric development has transformed most of the entire length of the Columbia and Snake rivers from a flowing river to a series of reservoir pools.

The Klamath River

Another important salmon river, the Klamath, flows through northwest California and southeast Oregon (Figure 8.15). It was once the third most productive salmon river of the U.S. West Coast, with half a million fish returning to spawn each year. However, Copco 1, a hydroelectric dam built in 1918, made most of the upper Klamath River basin inaccessible to salmon and other migratory fish. Three additional hydroelectric dams, built on the Klamath from 1925 to 1962, prevented migratory salmon from reaching approximately 970 kilometers (600 miles) of spawning streams in the upper Klamath River system, reducing the potential of the river system to produce salmon.

KLAMATH RIVER BASIN
image
FIGURE 8.15 Dams on the Klamath River prevent the passage of migratory salmon and other migratory fish species to the upper river basin, greatly reducing the area available for spawning.

These Klamath River dams have also had indirect impacts on salmon populations. Water diversions for agriculture have reduced flows in the river, and drainage from irrigated agricultural fields has introduced excess nutrients and organic contaminants such as pesticides into the river. Nutrients coming from upstream agricultural areas foster blooms of algae in the reservoirs and below them. Decomposing algae trigger oxygen depletion, which stresses salmon physiologically and leads to the spread of salmon diseases. In 2002, for instance, pathogens killed at least 33,000 adult salmon in the Klamath (Figure 8.16). In addition, water in the reservoirs behind the dams warms to temperatures unsuitable for salmon, which are a cold-water adapted fish that will die when temperatures exceed 24°C (75°F).

SALMON KILL ON THE KLAMATH RIVER
image
FIGURE 8.16 In 2002 degraded water quality made salmon migrating up the Klamath River more vulnerable to attack by pathogenic organisms, and tens of thousands of them died as a consequence.
(AP Photo/The Herald and News, Ron Winn)

242

image

How are the collapse of the Klamath River salmon and the collapse of the cod fishery similar? How are they different?

As a result of the combined effects of reduced spawning area, low water quality, and the ravages of pathogens, salmon and steelhead runs in the Klamath River have been reduced by approximately 90%. The decline in these stocks led to the closure of 1,000 kilometers (700 miles) of the West Coast of the United States to commercial salmon fishing from 2008 to 2011.

Mekong River Dam

The Mekong River is one of the world’s longest rivers, flowing 2,700 miles from the Tibetan plateau through Southeast Asia and into the South China Sea. Fish from these waters provide much-needed protein for more than 40 million people who live along it, making it one of the most important inland fisheries in the world. However, China has built seven dams along the upper stretches of the Mekong and is now financing several massive hydroelectric dams in Laos and Cambodia, which would alter the river’s flow and threaten its 850 fish species, including many migratory ones. For instance, the 107-foot-tall Xayaburi Dam in northern Laos may drive the Mekong giant catfish—an economically important species and one of the world’s largest freshwater fish—to extinction. Many other small-scale and subsistence fishers will also have their livelihoods threatened, and locals are fighting this and other dams on the Mekong through protests and lawsuits.

Think About It

  1. Should China consider how dam construction in that country will affect river productivity in other downstream countries? Explain why or why not.

  2. Although dams harm migratory fish populations, some nonmigratory species of lake fish benefit from dams. Is this a balanced tradeoff?