::The erosion completely changed the parent material from which future soil would develop.: It was the surface layers of soil that were heavily eroded in the Dust Bowl era, not the parent material, which remained basically unchanged.::Without a healthy layer of top soil, plant growth can be stunted, as this layer is typically rich in specific nutrients, such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium.: ::The erosion prevented water from moving down into the soil, significantly reducing groundwater availability for future crops: The erosion did not cause a reduction in groundwater availability; it was the drought that caused the regional water availabilty to decline.::A thin top soil horizon is prone to drying, which can lead to crop failure since suitable soil moisture levels cannot be maintained.:
4. Farming in the Great Plains in the early 1900s involved the removal of native grasslands in order to plant crops. After the harvest, much of this farmland was left barren, and when an extended drought occurred in the region, massive quantities of soil were blown away because there were no plants growing to stabilize the soil. Why was the Dust Bowl era’s erosion considered harmful to future crop production in the United States?