Evolutionary theory generates numerous predictions on how organisms will make decisions about parental investment. In the previous section we saw that there should be a relationship between a male’s certainty of paternity and his investment in the offspring. When paternity certainty is low, males should benefit by reducing their parental investment and, instead, seeking additional mating opportunities.
Often, however, it can be difficult to test such predictions experimentally. The results of a manipulation can be difficult to interpret—
A powerful strategy to address this challenge is to use an experimental manipulation that makes contrasting predictions in two different situations. That way, a response to the manipulation in one situation provides evidence in favor of the prediction, while a response in the second situation provides evidence for a lack of response to the manipulation. This serves as a sort of internal control in the experiment. Here’s how a researcher used this approach in two clever experiments.
The system Bluegill sunfish live in lakes and rivers in North America. Most males reach maturity at age 7 years. During the breeding season, males use their tail to create a depression in the sandy bottom and chase away almost everything that approaches this nest. Females come and lay eggs—
About 20% of the bluegill males in a population mature at age 2 years, at a much smaller size. These males, called “cuckold males,” hide near the nests of other males and attempt to sneak into the nest, fertilize the eggs, and escape without being detected by the nest “owner.”
Male bluegills are unable to distinguish between eggs they have fertilized and eggs fertilized by another male. They can, however, tell whether just-
Experiment 1 The researcher randomly chose 34 nests. Around each nest he placed two glass containers, each containing two small cuckold males, and left them there for the duration of the egg-
390
A day after the eggs were laid, the researcher placed a glass container with a predator fish (that eats eggs and just-
In each case, the researcher allotted a “parental care score,” reflecting the intensity of the male’s guarding of the eggs and defense of the hatched offspring.
Would you expect the presence of cuckold males to influence a nest owner’s perception of paternity certainty?
Prediction a: The presence of the cuckold males should reduce the nest owner’s paternity certainty and therefore reduce his egg-
Should the presence of cuckold males influence a nest owner’s perception of paternity certainty after the offspring hatch? Why or why not?
Prediction b: After the offspring hatch, the nest owner can determine whether they are his genetic offspring, so he should not exhibit any reduction in parental care relative to males in the control group.
Results of Experiment 1 Manipulation: Cuckold males nearby, but all eggs fertilized by nest owner
Parental Care Score | ||
Egg Guarding | Offspring Guarding | |
Prediction | Reduced | Unchanged |
Actual results: | ||
No rivals (control) | 80 ± 10 | 90 ± 10 |
Rivals present | 52 ± 7 | 95 ± 10 |
Change in care | Reduced | Unchanged |
How much did the presence of cuckold males reduce egg guarding? How much did it alter offspring guarding?
Experiment 2 The researcher randomly chose 20 new nests (none from Experiment 1) and, the day after egg-
Should a nest owner show reduced parental care of eggs that were swapped in from another nest? Why or why not?
Prediction a: Prior to hatching of the eggs, the nest owner should exhibit the same egg-
Should a nest owner show reduced parental care of hatched offspring after eggs were swapped? Why or why not?
Prediction b: After the offspring hatch, because the nest owner can determine whether they are his genetic offspring, he should exhibit reduced parental care relative to the control males.
Results of Experiment 2 Manipulation: Eggs swapped with those fertilized by a different male.
Parental Care Score | ||
Egg Guarding | Offspring Guarding | |
Prediction | Unchanged | Reduced |
Actual results: | ||
Eggs not swapped (control) | 90 ± 10 | 73 ± 9 |
Eggs swapped | 95 ± 10 | 50 ± 8 |
Change in care | Unchanged | Reduced |
How much was egg guarding reduced when unrelated eggs were swapped into the nest? How much was offspring guarding changed?
What conclusions can you draw from these results?
In each of the two experiments, males decreased their parental care relative to males in the control group in response to signs that the offspring were less likely to be their own genetic offspring. The experiments provide strong evidence that genetic relatedness to offspring plays an important role in parental care by a male bluegill sunfish.
Experimental manipulations of the cues of paternity certainty can increase or decrease a male’s parental investment in accordance with the prediction that decision making about parental investment reflects perceptions of genetic relatedness.
What did the experiments reveal about male parental investment in bluegill sunfish?
391