Testing for Hardy–Weinberg Proportions

To determine if a population’s genotypes are in Hardy–­Weinberg equilibrium, the genotypic proportions expected under the Hardy–Weinberg law must be compared with the observed genotypic frequencies. To do so, we first calculate the allelic frequencies, then find the expected genotypic frequencies by using the square of the allelic frequencies, and finally, compare the observed and expected genotypic frequencies by using a chi-square test (see Chapter 3). The next Worked Problem shows how this is done.

WORKED PROBLEM

Jeffrey Mitton and his colleagues found three genotypes (R2R2, R2R3, and R3R3) at a locus encoding the enzyme peroxidase in ponderosa pine trees growing at Glacier Lake, Colorado. The observed numbers of these genotypes were

Genotypes Number observed
R2R2 135
R2R3 44
R3R3 11

Are the ponderosa pine trees at Glacier Lake in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium at the peroxidase locus?

Solution Strategy

What information is required in your answer to the problem?

The results of a chi-square test to determine whether the population is in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

What information is provided to solve the problem?

  • The numbers of the different genotypes in a sample of the population.

Solution Steps

If the frequency of the R2 allele equals p and the frequency of the R3 allele equals q, the frequency of the R2 allele is

image

The frequency of the R3 allele is obtained by subtraction:

q = f(R3) = 1 – p = 0.174

The frequencies of the genotypes expected under Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium are then calculated by using p2, 2pq, and q2:

R2R2 = p2 = (0.826)2 = 0.683

R2R3 = 2pq = 2(0.826)(0.174) = 0.287

R3R3 = q2 = (0.174)2 = 0.03

Multiplying each of these expected genotypic frequencies by the total number of observed genotypes in the sample (190), we obtain the numbers expected for each genotype:

R2R2 = 0.683 × 190 = 129.8

R2R3 = 0.287 × 190 = 54.5

R3R3 = 0.03 × 190 = 5.7

By comparing these expected numbers with the observed numbers of each genotype, we see that there are more R2R2 and R3R3 homozygotes and fewer R2R3 heterozygotes in the population than we expect at equilibrium.

A chi-square goodness-of-fit test is used to determine whether the differences between the observed and the expected numbers of each genotype are due to chance:

image

The calculated chi-square value is 7.16. To obtain the probability associated with this chi-square value, we determine the appropriate degrees of freedom.

So far, the chi-square test for assessing Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium has been identical with the chi-square tests that we used in Chapter 3 to assess progeny ratios in a genetic cross, where the degrees of freedom were n – 1 and n equaled the number of expected genotypes. For the Hardy–Weinberg test, however, we must subtract an additional degree of freedom because the expected numbers are based on the observed allelic frequencies; therefore, the expected numbers are not completely free to vary. In general, the degrees of freedom for a chi-square test of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium equal the number of expected genotypic classes minus the number of associated alleles. For this particular Hardy–Weinberg test, the degree of freedom is 3 − 2 = 1.

After we have calculated both the chi-square value and the degrees of freedom, the probability associated with this value can be sought in a chi-square table (see Table 3.4). With 1 degree of freedom, a chi-square value of 7.16 has a probability between 0.01 and 0.001. Thus, the observed values differ significantly from the expected values, and the peroxidase genotypes observed at Glacier Lake are not likely to be in Hardy–Weinberg proportions.

image For additional practice, determine whether the genotypic frequencies in Problem 26 at the end of the chapter are in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.

CONCEPTS

The observed number of genotypes in a population can be compared with the expected Hardy–Weinberg proportions by using a chi-square goodness-of-fit test.