CREDIBLE SOURCES OF NUTRITION INFORMATION

As new research emerges that challenges long-held theories, how do scientists know what to trust? Often, they base their assessment of credibility on the strength of the evidence. Major factors that affect this evaluation are the quality of individual studies, the number of studies and the consistency of their results, and the magnitude of the effect. A fundamental principle of the scientific method is that similar results must be demonstrated multiple times before we can be confident that similar cause-and-effect relationships have been identified. The stronger the evidence of a relationship between specific nutrients and disease risk or prevention, the more likely scientists are to recommend that people make changes to their diet as a result of the findings.

Even nonexperts in nutrition today have access to an unprecedented amount of information about the effect of nutrients and food components on the body, genetic or otherwise. Some sources may suggest a particular nutrient is good for cardiovascular health, while other sources argue the exact opposite. So, to whom should you listen?

Experts and educators in nutrition have extensive training, often including clinical or research experience, that equip them to evaluate and translate scientific information into dietary and health advice. One recognized food and nutrition expert is the registered dietitian, or RD, (since 2013 RDs can also be called RDNs, which is short for registered dietitian nutritionist) who relies on the research and recommendations of scientists in nutrition, biochemistry, medicine, and the behavioral sciences to provide scientifically valid nutrition information and guidance to individuals and groups. Most RDs work in hospitals and other health-care facilities, perform research, have private practices, or have jobs in public health to help prevent and treat disease. They belong to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, the professional organization of registered dietitians. (“Nutritionists” are not always RDs—always check the background and credentials of people who call themselves nutritionists before seeking or following their advice).

REGISTERED DIETITIAN

food and nutrition expert who has met the minimum academic and professional requirements to qualify for the credential

image
Quick fix in a drink? Nutrition quackery abounds. Watch out for claims that sound too good to be true, nonscience-based testimonials, recommendations based upon just one study, or promises of quick “results.”
Paula Thomas/Getty Images

RDs are not the only source of credible nutrition information. Individuals who may not be an RD, but possess an advanced degree in nutrition, nutritional biochemistry, or other related disciplines from accredited universities can also be reliable sources of nutrition information. These individuals may work in universities as faculty (often teaching the courses that future RDs take), government agencies, or research institutions, and are those who carry out the research that informs our understanding of the impact of nutrition on health and disease.

According to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, most people obtain nutrition information from the Internet, television, or magazines. The most trustworthy sources provide evidence that stems from multiple peer-reviewed publications, and has the support of a group of experts in the field, described sometimes as “scientific consensus.” Be wary of “.com” websites (which might be selling a product related to the nutrition “advice”), and turn mostly to sites that are managed or reviewed by qualified health professionals. (INFOGRAPHIC 1.10)

INFOGRAPHIC 1.10 Credible Sources of Nutrition Information These agencies provide credible information because their positions rely on the results of peer-reviewed scientific publications and/or the consensus of many credentialed professionals (typically PhDs and MDs).
image

Question 1.10

image Why are the three publications that are “letters” considered credible sources of information despite not being peer-reviewed?

The three “letters” are not peer-reviewed but are considered credible sources of information because they rely on the expertise of the faculty within each of the universities that produce them.