This Web page was accessed on January 30, 2012.
WIKIPEDIA: ABOUT
WIKIPEDIA
1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2
A general introduction for visitors to Wikipedia. The project also has an encyclopedia article about itself, Wikipedia, and some introductions for aspiring contributors.
Wikipedia is running MediaWiki version 1.18wmf1 (r109351).
It has 3,859,117 content articles, and 26,106,710 pages in total.
There have been 513,565,315 edits.
There are 797,211 uploaded files.
There are 16,163,858 registered users, including 1,507 administrators.
This information is correct as of 18:50, 30 January 2012 (UTC).
3
For Wikipedia’s formal organizational structure, see Wikipedia: Formal organization.
4
Wikipedia (
i/ˌWIk∔ˈpi⧗di.ə/ or
i/ˌwIkiˈpi⧗di.ə/ WIK-i-
5
Wikipedia is written collaboratively by largely anonymous Internet volunteers who write without pay. Anyone with Internet access can write and make changes to Wikipedia articles (except in certain cases where editing is restricted to prevent disruption or vandalism). Users can contribute anonymously, under a pseudonym, or with their real identity, if they choose.
6
The fundamental principles by which Wikipedia operates are the five pillars. The Wikipedia community has developed many policies and guidelines to improve the encyclopedia; however, it is not a formal requirement to be familiar with them before contributing.
7
Since its creation in 2001, Wikipedia has grown rapidly into one of the largest reference websites, attracting 400 million unique visitors monthly as of March 2011 according to ComScore. There are more than 82,000 active contributors (http://en.wikipedia.org/
Page 458
8
People of all ages, cultures, and backgrounds can add or edit article prose, references, images, and other media here. What is contributed is more important than the expertise or qualifications of the contributor. What will remain depends upon whether it fits within Wikipedia’s policies, including being verifiable against a published reliable source, so excluding editors’ opinions and beliefs and unreviewed research, and is free of copyright restrictions and contentious material about living people. Contributions cannot damage Wikipedia because the software allows easy reversal of mistakes and many experienced editors are watching to help ensure that edits are cumulative improvements. Begin by simply clicking the edit link at the top of any editable page!
9
Wikipedia is a live collaboration differing from paper-
This Web page was accessed on April 24, 2012.
ABOUT THE IEP
INTERNET ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PHILOSOPHY
1
The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (IEP) (ISSN 2161-
2
Most of the articles in the IEP are original contributions by specialized philosophers; these are identifiable by the author’s name at the foot of the article. Others are temporary, or “proto articles,” and have largely been adapted from older sources. They are identifiable by the inclusion of the initials “IEP” at the close and will in time be replaced by original articles.
Statement of Purpose
3
“The purpose of the IEP is to provide detailed, scholarly information on key topics and philosophers in all areas of philosophy.”
The purpose of the IEP is to provide detailed, scholarly information on key topics and philosophers in all areas of philosophy. The Encyclopedia is free of charge and available to all users of the Internet world-
Page 459
Scholarly Standards
4
Our peer review process is rigorous and meets high academic standards. Authors submit their articles to a specific IEP area editor, who reads through the article and makes an initial judgment about its overall quality. Many submissions are rejected at this stage. The area editor then sends the promising submission to qualified referees. Usually there are two referees per article. The area editor evaluates the reviews from the referees, makes a decision whether to publish, and sends a recommendation to the author. Most submissions are then revised, in either their form or substance. In some cases more rounds of revision are required, and we sometimes must reject entries because of inadequate revision. More commonly, any problems with entries are fixed with revision—
5
Consequently, the quality of our articles is at the same level as that of the best multi-
Citing Entries
6
Here is a suggested way to cite our articles in your own writing:
“Naturalistic Epistemology,” by Chase B. Wrenn, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ISSN 2161-
7
As the Encyclopedia is regularly updated, we archive earlier versions for our own records; earlier versions are publicly available at archive.org. Teachers and scholars with special needs—
Page 460
AT ISSUE: SOURCES FOR DEVELOPING A DEFINITION ARGUMENT
According to the “About” sections of these two online encyclopedias, how is The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy different from Wikipedia? Do you think both encyclopedias are aimed at the same audience?
Who is able to add to or edit Wikipedia articles? Who is able to make changes to The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy? Who is not able to make changes?
How do the editors of each online encyclopedia try to maintain the quality of their articles? Which encyclopedia do you think is more successful at doing this?
Both Wikipedia and The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy give users access to earlier versions of articles. Why do they do this? What can users gain by looking at these earlier versions?
In your opinion, which is the more reliable source, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy or Wikipedia? Why?