206
Many everyday arguments—
The major difference between an oral argument and a written one is that an audience cannot reread an oral argument to clarify information. Listeners have to understand an oral argument the first time they hear it. To help your listeners, you need to design your presentation with this limitation in mind, considering the following guidelines:
An oral argument should contain verbal signals that help guide listeners. Transitional phrases such as “My first point,” “My second point,” and “Let me sum up” are useful in oral arguments, where listeners do not have a written text in front of them. They alert listeners to information to come and signal shifts from one point to another.
An oral argument should use simple, direct language and avoid long sentences. Complicated sentences that contain elevated language and numerous technical terms are difficult for listeners to follow. For this reason, your sentences should be straightforward and easy to understand.
An oral argument should repeat key information. A traditional rule of thumb for oral arguments is, “Tell listeners what you’re going to tell them; then tell it to them; finally, tell them what you’ve told them.” In other words, in the introduction of an oral argument, tell your listeners what they are going to hear; in the body, discuss your points, one at a time; and finally, in your conclusion, restate your points. This intentional repetition ensures that your listeners follow (and remember) your points.
An oral argument should include visuals. Visual aids can make your argument easier to follow. You can use visuals to identify your points as you discuss them. You can also use visuals—