14.77 The effect of an outlier.
Refer to the weight-loss study described in Exercise 14.59 (page 754).
loss
14.77
(a) The results are nearly identical as before: .
Loss | |||
---|---|---|---|
Level of Group |
Mean | Std Dev | |
Ctrl | 35 | 0.3543 | 14.6621 |
Grp | 34 | −10.7853 | 11.1392 |
Indiv | 35 | −3.7086 | 9.0784 |
(b) The results are not as significant: .
Loss | |||
---|---|---|---|
Level of Group |
Mean | Std Dev | |
Ctrl | 35 | −1.0086 | 11.5007 |
Grp | 34 | −9.0206 | 18.4317 |
Indiv | 35 | −3.7086 | 9.0784 |
(c) With the first outlier, the means got farther apart, suggesting more significance, but the estimated variance went from 112.81 to 140.65, suggesting a worse fit, which resulted in a very similar and -value. With the second outlier, the means got closer together, suggesting less significance, and the estimated variance went from 112.81 to 183.27, also suggesting a much worse fit, which resulted in a -value much less significant than originally and almost not significant. In both cases, the estimate variance got much worse, so generally outliers should make it harder to so see significance. But as shown in the first example, if the outlier pulls the means farther apart, this may not be true. (d) We can see the incorrect observation because the standard deviation for the group with the outlier becomes much larger than the standard deviations for the other groups.