For Exercises 6.51 and 6.52, see pages 320–321; for 6.53 to 6.55, see pages 323–324; for 6.56 to 6.59, see pages 325–326; for 6.60 to 6.62, see pages 328–329; for 6.63 and 6.64, see page 331; and for 6.65 and 6.66, see page 332.
6.67 What’s wrong?
Here are several situations in which there is an incorrect application of the ideas presented in this section. Write a short explanation of what is wrong in each situation and why it is wrong.
6.67
(a) The null hypothesis should contain the = sign, so the hypothesis should be “… the average weekly demand is equal to 100 units.” (b) The square root is missing; the standard deviation should be . (c) The hypotheses are always about the parameter, not the statistic, so it should be : .
6.68 What’s wrong?
Here are several situations in which there is an incorrect application of the ideas presented in this section. Write a short explanation of what is wrong in each situation and why it is wrong.
6.69 What’s wrong?
Here are several situations in which there is an incorrect application of the ideas presented in this section. Write a short explanation of what is wrong in each situation and why it is wrong.
6.69
(a) For , we reject when is either bigger than 1.96 or smaller than . (b) You cannot just compare to ; we need to do a hypothesis test. (c) The -value is always the tail probability, so it should be . (d) is missing from the formula.
6.70 Interpreting -value.
The reporting of -values is standard practice in statistics. Unfortunately, misinterpretations of -values by producers and readers of statistical reports are common. The previous two exercises dealt with a few incorrect applications of the -value. This exercise explores the -value a bit further.
334
6.71 Hypotheses.
Each of the following situations requires a significance test about a population mean . State the appropriate null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis in each case.
6.71
(a) . (b) . (c) .
6.72 Hypotheses.
In each of the following situations, a significance test for a population mean is called for. State the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis in each case.
6.73 Hypotheses.
In each of the following situations, state an appropriate null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis . Be sure to identify the parameters that you use to state the hypotheses. (We have not yet learned how to test these hypotheses.)
6.73
(a) = percent of males, = percent of females. . (b) = mean score for Group A, = mean score for group B. . (c) = correlation between income and the percent of disposable income that is saved. .
6.74 Hypotheses.
Translate each of the following research questions into appropriate and .
6.75 Exercise and statistics exams.
A study examined whether exercise affects how students perform on their final exam in statistics. The -value was given as 0.68.
6.75
(a) Answers will vary. (b) Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is no evidence that exercise affects how students perform on their final exam in statistics. (c) How did they measure exercise—was it observational or experimental, how did they get the sample, etc.
6.76 Financial aid.
The fnancial aid office of a university asks a sample of students about their employment and earnings. The report says that “for academic year earnings, a signifcant difference was found between the sexes, with men earning more on the average. No difference was found between the earnings of black and white students.”18 Explain both of these conclusions, for the effects of sex and of race on mean earnings, in language understandable to someone who knows no statistics.
335
6.77 Who is the author?
Statistics can help decide the authorship of literary works. Sonnets by a certain Elizabethan poet are known to contain an average of new words (words not used in the poet’s other works). The standard deviation of the number of new words is . Now a manuscript with five new sonnets has come to light, and scholars are debating whether it is the poet’s work. The new sonnets contain an average of words not used in the poet’s known works. We expect poems by another author to contain more new words, so to see if we have evidence that the new sonnets are not by our poet, we test
Give the test statistic and its -value. What do you conclude about the authorship of the new poems?
6.77
. -value (< 0.0002). The new poems are by another author.
6.78 Study habits.
The Survey of Study Habits and Attitudes (SSHA) is a psychological test that measures the motivation, attitude toward school, and study habits of students. Scores range from 0 to 200. The mean score for U.S. college students is about 115, and the standard deviation is about 30. A teacher who suspects that older students have better attitudes toward school gives the SSHA to 25 students who are at least 30 years of age. Their mean score is .
(a) Assuming that for the population of older students, carry out a test of
Report the -value of your test, draw a sketch illustrating the -value, and state your conclusion clearly. (b) Your test in part (a) required two important assumptions in addition to the assumption that the value of σis known. What are they? Which of these assumptions is most important to the validity of your conclusion in part (a)?
6.79 Corn yield.
The 10-year historical average yield of corn in the United States is about 160 bushels per acre. A survey of 50 farmers this year gives a sample mean yield of bushels per acre. We want to know whether this is good evidence that the national mean this year is not 160 bushels per acre. Assume that the farmers surveyed are an SRS from the population of all commercial corn growers and that the standard deviation of the yield in this population is bushels per acre. Report the value of the test statistic , give a sketch illustrating the -value and report the -value for the test of
Are you convinced that the population mean is not 160 bushels per acre? Is your conclusion correct if the distribution of corn yields is somewhat non-Normal? Why?
6.79
. -value = 0.0238. There is evidence that the population mean is not 160 bushels per acre. Yes, the conclusion is still correct for non-Normality because of the central limit theorem.
6.80 E-cigarette use among the youth.
E-cigarettes are battery operated devices that aim to mimic standard cigarettes. They don’t contain tobacco but operate by heating nicotine into a vapor that is inhaled. Here is an excerpt from a 2014 UK public health report in which the use of e-cigarettes among children (ages 11 to 18) is summarized:
In terms of prevalence, among all children “ever use” of e-cigarettes was low but did increase between the two surveys. In 2011 it was 3.3%, rising to in 2012. Current use (>1 day in the past 30 days) signifcantly increased from 1.1 to , and current “dual use” (e-cigarettes and tobacco) increased from 0.8 to from 2011 to 2012.19
6.81 Academic probation and TV watching.
There are other statistics that we have not yet met. We can use Table D to assess the significance of any statistic. A study compares the habits of students who are on academic probation with students whose grades are satisfactory. One variable measured is the hours spent watching television last week. The null hypothesis is “no difference” between the means for the two populations. The alternative hypothesis is two-sided. The value of the test statistic is .
6.81
(a) No. (b) No.
6.82 Impact of on significance.
The Statistical Significance applet illustrates statistical tests with a fixed level of significance for Normally distributed data with known standard deviation. Open the applet and keep the default settings for the null and the alternative hypotheses, the sample size , the standard deviation , and the significance level . In the “I have data and the observed is ” box, enter the value 1. Is the difference between and signifcant at the 5% level? Repeat for equal to 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9. Make a table giving and the results of the significance tests. What do you conclude?
336
6.83 Effect of changing on significance.
Repeat the previous exercise with significance level . How does the choice of affect which values of are far enough away from to be statistically signifcant?
6.83
At , it is significant at . If is smaller, has to be farther away from to be significant.
6.84 Changing to a two-sided alternative.
Repeat the previous exercise but with the two-sided alternative hypothesis. How does this change affect which values of are far enough away from to be statistically signifcant at the 0.01 level?
6.85 Changing the sample size.
Refer to Exercise 6.82. Suppose that you increase the sample size from 10 to 40. Again make a table giving and the results of the significance tests at the 0.05 significance level. What do you conclude?
6.85
The test is significant when . Larger samples are able to detect smaller differences between and .
6.86 Impact of on the -value.
We can also study the -value using the Statistical Significance applet. Reset the applet to the default settings for the null and the alternative hypotheses, the sample size , the standard deviation , and the significance level . In the “I have data, and the observed is ” box, enter the value 1. What is the -value? It is shown at the top of the blue vertical line. Repeat for equal to 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9. Make a table giving and -values. How does the -value change as moves farther away from ?
6.87 Changing to a two-sided alternative, continued.
Repeat the previous exercise but with the two-sided alternative hypothesis. How does this change affect the -values associated with each ? Explain why the -values change in this way.
6.87
The -value doubles for each value because our -value now represents two tail areas.
6.88 Other changes and the -value.
Refer to the previous exercise.
6.89 Why is it signifcant at the 5% level?
Explain in plain language why a significance test that is signifcant at the 1% level must always be signifcant at the 5% level.
6.89
If the -value is less than 0.01, it must also be less than 0.05.
6.90 Finding a -value.
You have performed a two-sided test of significance and obtained a value of .
6.91 Test statistic and levels of significance.
Consider a significance test for a null hypothesis versus a two-sided alternative. Give a value of that will give a result signifcant at the 1% level but not at the 0.5% level.
6.91
Any number between 2.576 and 2.807 (or −2.576 and −2.807).
6.92 Finding a -value.
You have performed a one-sided test of significance for greater-than alternative and obtained a value of .