One could say that globalization in Oceania began when the first European explorers came into the region, beginning the trend of influence by outsiders (primarily Europeans) on settlement, culture, and economics. More recently, the United States has exerted a powerful influence on trade and politics in the region. For the past several decades, however, globalization has reoriented this region toward Asia, which buys more than 76 percent of Australia’s exports (mainly coal, iron ore, and other minerals). In 2011, China and India each purchased not only the output of mines, but also major shares of Australia’s coal deposits. Both countries use coal to generate energy and are trying to secure future access to more coal. Asia also buys nearly 35 percent of New Zealand’s exports (primarily meat, wool, and dairy products), as well as many other products and services from islands across Oceania (Figure 11.15).

Asia is also a major source of the region’s imports. Because there is little manufacturing in Oceania, most manufactured goods are imported from China, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and Thailand—Oceania’s leading trading partners. Both Australia and New Zealand have free trade agreements either completed or in continuous negotiation with Asia’s two largest economies, China and Japan.

The Pacific islands are further along in their reorientation toward Asia than are Australia and New Zealand. Not only are coconut, forest, and fish products from the Pacific islands sold to Asian markets, but Asian companies own more and more of these industries on the various islands. Fleets from Asia regularly fish the offshore waters of Pacific island nations. Asians also dominate the Pacific island tourist trade, both as tourists and as investors in tourism infrastructure. And growing numbers of Asians are taking up residence in the Pacific islands, exerting widespread economic and social influence.

For Australia and New Zealand, Asia’s global economic rise has meant both more trade and more competition with Asian economies in foreign markets. Throughout Oceania, local industries used to enjoy protected or preferential trade with Europe. They have lost that advantage because EU regulations stemming from the EU’s membership in the World Trade Organization (WTO) prohibit such arrangements. No longer protected in their trade with Europe, local industries now face stiff competition from larger companies in Asia that benefit from much cheaper labor.

Australia and New Zealand are somewhat unusual in having achieved broad prosperity largely on the basis of exporting raw materials over a long period of time and to a wide range of customers (see Figures 11.14E and 11.15). Preferential trade with Europe allowed higher profits for many export industries. Strong labor movements in Australia and New Zealand meant that these industries’ profits were more equitably distributed throughout society than the profits in other raw materials–based economies in Middle and South America and sub-Saharan Africa. Australian coal miners’ unions successfully agitated not just for good wages, but also for the world’s first 35-hour workweek. Other labor unions won a minimum wage, pensions, and aid to families with children long before such programs were enacted in many other industrialized countries. For decades, these arrangements were very successful. Both Australia and New Zealand had living standards comparable to those in North America but with a more egalitarian distribution of income. Since the 1970s, however, competition from Asian companies has meant that many workers in Australia and New Zealand have lost jobs and seen their hard-won benefits scaled back or eliminated.

Competition from Asian companies has also led to lower corporate profits in Oceania. As corporate profits have fallen, so have government tax revenues, which has resulted in cuts to previously high rates of social spending on welfare, health care, and education. The loss of social support, especially for those who have lost jobs, has contributed to rising poverty in recent years. Australia now has the second-highest poverty rate in the industrialized world. (The United States has the highest.)

Maintaining Raw Materials Exports as Service Economies Develop Although their monetary contribution to national economies remains high, industries that export raw materials are of decreasing prominence in the economies of Australia and New Zealand in that they now employ fewer people because of mechanization. This shift to replacing human labor with machinery has been essential for these industries to stay globally competitive with other countries where living standards are lower and workers are paid much less.

Today, the economies of both Australia and New Zealand are dominated by diverse and growing service sectors, which have links to the region’s export sectors. Extracting minerals and managing herds and cropland have become technologically sophisticated enterprises that depend on many supporting services and an educated workforce. Australia is now a world leader in providing technical and other services to mining companies, sheep farmers, and winemakers, and New Zealand’s well-educated workforce and well-developed marketing infrastructure have helped it break into luxury markets for dairy products, meats, and fruits. Perhaps the most visible success has been New Zealand’s global marketing of the indigenous kiwifruit. (In fact, kiwi is now a slang term for anyone from New Zealand.)

Economic Change in the Pacific Islands In general, the Pacific islands are also shifting away from extractive industries, such as mining and fishing, and toward service industries, such as tourism and government. On many islands, self-sufficiency and resources from abroad cushion the stress of economic change. Many households still construct their own homes and rely on fishing and subsistence cultivation for much of their food supply. On the islands of Fiji, for example, part-time subsistence agriculture engages more than 60 percent of the population, although it accounts for just under 17 percent of the economy. Remittances sent home from the thousands of Pacific Islanders working abroad are essential to many Pacific island economies and constitute more than half of all income on some islands. However, remittances are rarely part of official statistics.

In the relatively poor and undereducated nations (the Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, and parts of Papua New Guinea, for example), conditions typify what has been termed a MIRAB economy—one based on migration, remittances, aid, and bureaucracy. Foreign aid from former or present colonial powers supports government bureaucracies that supply employment for the educated and semiskilled. A MIRAB economy has little potential for growth. Nevertheless, Islanders who can be self-sufficient in food and shelter while saving extra cash for travel and occasional purchases of manufactured goods are sometimes said to have achieved subsistence affluence.

Where there is poverty, it is often related to geographic isolation, which means a lack of access to information and economic opportunity. Although computers and the new global communication networks are not yet widely available in the Pacific islands, they have the potential to significantly alleviate this isolation.

Tourism is a growing part of the economy throughout Oceania. Tourists come largely from Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Southeast Asia, the Americas, and Europe (Figure 11.16). In 2008 (the latest year for which complete figures are available), 17.7 million tourists arrived in Oceania. Of the tourists visiting Oceania, 23 percent came from Asia—16 percent from Japan alone; just 11 percent came from Europe, down from 17 percent in recent years; 33 percent came from North America; 19 percent were from within Oceania; and 12 percent came from other locations.

In some Pacific island groups, the number of tourists far exceeds the island population. Guam, for example, receives tourists annually in numbers equivalent to five times its population. Palau and the Northern Mariana Islands annually receive more than four times their populations. Such large numbers of visitors expecting to be entertained and graciously accommodated can place a special stress on local inhabitants. And although they bring money to the islands’ economies, these visitors create problems for island ecologies, place extra burdens on water and sewer systems, and require a standard of living that may be far out of reach for local people. Perhaps nowhere else in the region are the issues raised by tourism as clear as they are in Hawaii.

Despite the powerful forces pushing Oceania toward Asia, important factors still favor strong ties with Europe and North America. In spite of the trade links and China’s recent efforts to expand diplomatic and cultural relations with Australia, both Australia and New Zealand remain staunch military allies of the United States. Over the years, both have participated in U.S.-led wars in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. In 2012, in an apparent effort to check the growing influence of the Chinese military in the South China Sea and the Indian Ocean, the Australian government gave the U.S. Marine Corps access to a large tract of land near Darwin (located in Australia’s Northern Territory). The United States and Australia also opened discussions regarding the use of the Cocos Islands (Australian possessions in the Indian Ocean) for reconnaissance purposes.

In some of the Pacific islands, strong links to Europe and North America are also upheld by Europe and the U.S.’s continuing administrative control. In Micronesia, the United States governs Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands; in Polynesia, American Samoa is a U.S. territory. Just as the Hawaiian Islands are a U.S. state, the 120 islands of French Polynesia—including Tahiti and the rest of the Society Islands, the Marquesas Islands, and the Tuamotu Archipelago—are Overseas Lands of France. Any desire people in these possessions have for independence has not been sufficient to override the financial benefits of aid, subsidies, and investment money provided by France and the United States.

In 1989, Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) formed as a group of 21 Pacific countries. Today, these states account for approximately 40 percent of the world’s population, just over 50 percent of global production, and more than 40 percent of global trade. Its members include Oceania’s most populous countries (Australia, Papua New Guinea, and New Zealand), as well as Brunei, Canada, Chile, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, the Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Taipei, Thailand, the United States, and Vietnam. APEC was organized to enhance economic prosperity and strengthen the Asia–Pacific community, and while much is made of its potential, its inability to compel its membership to act in any way has led some to dismiss it as a pointless “talk shop.” Nevertheless, should APEC ever evolve into a more potent force, the population and wealth of its membership would place it on par with the European Union (after which it is partially patterned), NAFTA, or the WTO. So far, APEC has tried to forge international cooperation on food security, climate change, and energy-efficient transportation.