The Nature of Interviews
Although interviewing is not exactly like grabbing lunch with a friend, the same principles that apply to all forms of communication are also at work in an interview with some important differences.
An interview is a transaction that is more structured and goal-driven than other forms of communication. The communication is deliberate and purposeful for at least one of the parties involved and often involves attempts to influence the other(s) (Atlas, 2011; O’Hair, Friedrich, & Dixon, 2011).
- Interviews are planned. Interviews have a purpose that goes beyond the establishment and development of a relationship. At least one of the parties has a predetermined reason for initiating the interview (for example, to gather information).
- Interviews are goal-driven. Because a goal exists in advance of the interaction, at least one of the participants plans a strategy for initiating, conducting, and concluding the interview.
- Interviews are structured. The primary goal of an interview is almost always defined at the beginning of the meeting, something that’s rarely true of a conversation with a friend. Interview relationships are more formally structured, and clear status differences often exist. One party usually expects to exert more control than the other.
- Interviews are dyadic. Like other forms of interpersonal communication, the interview is dyadic, meaning that it involves two parties. In some instances, a “party” consists of more than one person, as when survey researchers conduct group interviews or when job applicants appear before a panel of interviewers. In such situations, even though a number of individuals are involved, there are only two parties (interviewers and interviewees), each with a role to play.
- Interviews are transactional. Interviews involve two-way communication in which both parties take turns in speaking and listening roles with a heavy dependence on questions and answers. Although most interviews occur face to face, interviews over the phone or via a video conference are also considered transactional discourse. Although the parties take turns in speaking and listening roles, you will recall from Chapter 1 that communicators don’t turn themselves off in the listening role; they provide valuable nonverbal feedback.
Think back to the Comedy Central interviews. They are not only dyadic and transactional but also highly planned. Questions are written ahead of time, based on the interviewee’s views and background, and the interviews are structured in a way that helps the company achieve a goal: usually a hilarious spoof on key topics. One key difference is that the interviewee responses are often distorted or cut off—something you wouldn’t expect in your own interviews.
ALL INTERVIEWS, whether a question-and-answer session with E! on the red carpet or a serious job interview, are goal-driven, as well as dyadic and interactive in nature. (left) Roth Stock/Everett Collection; (middle top) © The CW/Courtesy Everett Collection; (middle bottom) ERproductions Ltd./Getty Images; (right) Wavebreakmedia/Shutterstock