Making Historical Arguments: Was the New United States a Christian Country?

220

Was the New United States a Christian Country?

Rebecca Samuel, a Jewish resident of Virginia, conveyed her excitement about the new U.S. Constitution when she wrote her German parents in 1791 that finally “Jew and Gentile are as one” in the realm of politics and citizenship. Other voices were distinctly less approving. An Antifederalist pamphlet warned that the pope could become president; another feared that “a Turk, a Jew, a Roman Catholic, and what is worse than all, a Universalist, may be President.”

The document that produced such wildly different reactions was indeed remarkable for the conspicuous absence of religion. The Constitution did not invoke Christianity as a state religion. It made no reference to an almighty being, and it specifically promised, in article 6, section 3, that “no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”

Many Christian leaders were stunned at the Constitution’s near silence on religion, a turnabout from most state constitutions. A New Yorker warned that “should the Citizens of America be as irreligious as her Constitution, we will have reason to tremble, lest the Governor of the universe . . . crush us to atoms.” A delegate to North Carolina’s ratifying convention predicted that the Constitution was “an invitation for Jews and pagans of every kind to come among us.” A concerned Presbyterian minister asked Alexander Hamilton why religion was not in the Constitution. Hamilton reportedly quipped, “Indeed, Doctor, we forgot it.”

Measured against the practices of state governments, Hamilton’s observation is hardly credible. The men who wrote the state constitutions actively debated qualifications for voting and officeholding. Along with factors like property ownership, race, gender, and age, many also argued for religious qualifications.

Most leaders of the 1780s took for granted that Christianity was the one true faith and the essential foundation of morality. All but two state constitutions assumed the primacy of Protestantism, and one-third of them collected public taxes to support Christian churches. Every state but one required officeholders to take a Christian oath. For example, members of Pennsylvania’s legislature swore to “acknowledge the Scripture of the Old and New Testament to be given by divine inspiration.”

Governors proclaimed fast days and public thanksgivings in the name of the Holy Trinity. Chaplains led legislatures in Christian prayer. Jurors and witnesses swore Christian oaths. New England states passed Sabbath laws prohibiting all work or travel on Sunday. Blasphemy laws punished people who cursed the Christian God or Jesus.

Although close to half the state constitutions did include freedom of religious conscience as an explicit right, this right promised nothing about political equality. How then did the U.S. Constitution come to be such a break from the immediate past? Had the Constitution’s writers really just forgotten about religion?

Not James Madison of Virginia. Madison arrived at the constitutional convention fresh from a hard-fought battle in Virginia to establish religious liberty free from all state interference. Opponents sponsored a bill to support Christian ministers with tax money; Madison instead secured passage in 1786 of the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, a document drafted several years earlier by Thomas Jefferson. The statute guaranteed freedom of conscience and prohibited any distinctions in “civil capacities” based on religion. In Jefferson’s distinctive formulation, the statute asserted “that our civil rights have no dependence on our religious opinions any more than our opinions in physics or geometry.” There could be no religious tests for officeholding thereafter in Virginia and no state funding of ministers.

221

The Virginia Statute expressed Madison’s ideal, but on practical grounds he preferred that the U.S. Constitution say little about religion since state laws reflected a variety of positions. When Antifederalists demanded a bill of rights, Madison drew up a list for the first Congress to consider. Two on his list dealt with religion, but only one was approved: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” In a stroke, Madison placed religious worship and the privileging of any one church beyond Congress’s power. His second proposal failed to gain traction: “No State shall violate the equal rights of conscience.” Evidently, the states wanted to keep their Christian-only rules that violated dissenters’ consciences and kept them out of office.

Gradually, states deleted restrictive laws, but as late as 1840 Jews still could not hold public office in four states. Well into the twentieth century, Sunday laws in some states forced business closings on the Christian Sabbath, creating economic hardship for those whose religion prohibited work on Saturday. The guarantee of freedom of conscience in religion was implanted in various founding documents in the 1770s and 1780s, but it took many years to fulfill Jefferson’s and Madison’s larger vision of what true religious liberty means: the freedom for religious belief to be independent of civil status.

image
Touro Synagogue This 1759 synagogue in Newport, Rhode Island, is the oldest Jewish house of worship still standing in the United States. President Washington visited “the Hebrew Congregation” there in 1790 and wrote: “It is now no more that toleration is spoken of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people, that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights.”
© NPS/Alamy Stock Photo.

Questions for Analysis

Summarize the Argument: In what ways was the United States a specifically Christian nation? In what ways was the Constitution designed to be nondenominational?

Analyze the Evidence: What point was Jefferson making when he equated opinions about religion to opinions about physics or geometry as irrelevant factors in determining citizens’ civil rights?

Consider the Context: Why do you think so many state constitutions allowed only Protestants to hold political office? What may have motivated the Constitution’s departure from those preceding governments?