DOCUMENT 6–2: An Oration on the Second Anniversary of the Boston Massacre

Reading the American Past: Printed Page 103

DOCUMENT 6–2

An Oration on the Second Anniversary of the Boston Massacre

For many years after 1770, Bostonians commemorated the Boston Massacre with an address by a leading patriot. This oration by Joseph Warren on March 5, 1772, attacked British policies and reminded colonists of their duties to themselves and their ancestors. Warren, a Boston physician and political activist, later served as a militia officer and was killed at Bunker Hill. His Boston Massacre oration, excerpted here, illustrates the arguments that made sense to many colonists and the passion with which they defended their beliefs.

Joseph Warren

Boston Massacre Oration, March 5, 1772

Let us now allow ourselves a few moments to examine the late Acts of the British Parliament for taxing America. Let us with candour judge whether they are constitutionally binding upon us; if they are, in the name of justice let us submit to them, without one murmuring word.

First, I would ask whether the members of the British House of Commons are the democracy of this province? If they are, they are either the people of this province, or are elected by the people of this province to represent them, and have therefore a constitutional right to originate a bill for taxing them; it is most certain they are neither; and therefore nothing done by them can be said to be done by the democratic branch of our constitution. I would next ask, whether the lords, who compose the aristocratic branch of the legislature, are peers of America? I never heard it was . . . so much as pretended, and if they are not, certainly no act of theirs can be said to be the act of the aristocratic branch of our constitution. ... I do not conceive it to be of the least importance to us by whom our property is taken away, so long as it is taken without our consent; and I am very much at a loss to know by what figure of rhetoric, the inhabitants of this province can be called free subjects, when they are obliged to obey implicitly, such laws as are made for them by men three thousand miles off, whom they know not, and whom they never empowered to act for them, or how they can be said to have property, when a body of men, over whom they have not the least control, and who are not in any way accountable to them, shall oblige them to deliver up any part, or the whole of their substance without even asking their consent; and yet whoever pretends that the late Acts of the British Parliament for taxing America ought to be deemed binding upon us, must admit at once that we are absolute slaves, and have no property of our own; or else that we may be freemen, and at the same time under a necessity of obeying the arbitrary commands of those over whom we have no control or influence, and that we may have property of our own which is entirely at the disposal of another. Such gross absurdities, I believe, will not be relished in this enlightened age: and it can be no matter of wonder that the people quickly perceived, and seriously complained of the inroads which these Acts must unavoidably make upon their liberty, and of the hazard to which their whole property is by them exposed; for, if they may be taxed without their consent, even in the smallest trifle, they may also, without their consent, be deprived of everything they possess, although never so valuable, never so dear. ... [A]s it was soon found that this taxation could not be supported by reason and argument, it seemed necessary that one act of oppression should be enforced by another, and therefore, contrary to our just rights as possessing, or at least having a just title to possess, all the liberties and immunities of British subjects, a standing army was established among us in time of peace; and evidently for the purpose of . . . enforcement of obedience to acts which, upon fair examination, appeared to be unjust and unconstitutional. ...

That this was the avowed design of stationing an armed force in this town is sufficiently known; and we, my fellow citizens, have seen, we have felt the tragical effects! The fatal fifth of March, 1770, can never be forgotten. The horrors of that dreadful night are but too deeply impressed on our hearts. Language is too feeble to paint the emotion of our souls, when our streets were stained with the blood of our brethren — when our ears were wounded by the groans of the dying, and our eyes were tormented with the sight of the mangled bodies of the dead.

When our alarmed imagination presented to our view our houses wrapped in flames, our children subjected to the barbarous caprice of the raging soldiery, our beauteous virgins exposed to all the insolence of unbridled passion, our virtuous wives, endeared to us by every tender tie, falling a sacrifice to worse than brutal violence, and perhaps like the famed Lucretia distracted with anguish and despair, ending their wretched lives by their own fair hands. When we beheld the authors of our distress parading in our streets, or drawn up in a regular battalia, as though in a hostile city, our hearts beat to arms; we snatched our weapons, almost resolved by one decisive stroke to avenge the death of our slaughtered brethren, and to secure from future danger all that we held most dear: but propitious heaven forbade the bloody carnage and saved the threatened victims of our too keen resentment, not by their discipline, not by their regular array, no, it was royal George's livery that proved their shield — it was that which turned the pointed engines of destruction from their breasts. The thoughts of vengeance were soon buried in our inbred affection to Great Britain, and calm reason dictated a method of removing the troops more mild than an immediate resource to the sword. With united efforts you urged the immediate departure of the troops from the town — you urged it, with a resolution which ensured success — you obtained your wishes, and the removal of the troops was effected without one drop of their blood being shed by the inhabitants. ...

I do not know one single advantage which can arise to the British nation from our being enslaved. I know not of any gains which can be wrung from us by oppression which they may not obtain from us by our own consent in the smooth channel of commerce. We wish the wealth and prosperity of Britain; we contribute largely to both. ... The amazing increase of riches to Britain, the great rise of the value of her lands, the flourishing state of her navy, are striking proofs of the advantages derived to her from her commerce with the colonies; and it is our earnest desire that she may still continue to enjoy the same emoluments, until her streets are paved with American gold; only, let us have the pleasure of calling it our own whilst it is in our own hands; but this it seems is too great a favour. We are to be governed by the absolute command of others; our property is to be taken away without our consent. If we complain, our complaints are treated with contempt; if we assert our rights, that assertion is deemed insolence; if we humbly offer to submit the matter to the impartial decision of reason, the sword is judged the most proper argument to silence our murmurs! But this cannot long be the case. Surely the British nation will not suffer the reputation of their justice and their honour to be thus sported away by a capricious ministry; no, they will in a short time open their eyes to their true interest. They nourish in their own breasts a noble love of liberty; they hold her dear, and they know that all who have once possessed her charms had rather die than suffer her to be torn from their embraces. They are also sensible that Britain is so deeply interested in the prosperity of the colonies that she must eventually feel every wound given to their freedom; they cannot be ignorant that more dependence may be placed on the affections of a brother than on the forced service of a slave; they must approve your efforts for the preservation of your rights; from a sympathy of soul they must pray for your success. And I doubt not but they will, ere long, exert themselves effectually, to redress your grievances. ...

You have, my friends and countrymen, frustrated the designs of your enemies by your unanimity and fortitude. It was your union and determined spirit which expelled those troops who polluted your streets with innocent blood. You have appointed this anniversary as a standard memorial of the bloody consequences of placing an armed force in a populous city, and of your deliverance from the dangers which then seemed to hang over your heads; and I am confident that you never will betray the least want of spirit when called upon to guard your freedom. None but they who set a just value upon the blessings of liberty are worthy to enjoy her. Your illustrious fathers were her zealous votaries. When the blasting frowns of tyranny drove her from public view they clasped her in their arms, they cherished her in their generous bosoms, they brought her safe over the rough ocean and fixed her seat in this then dreary wilderness; they nursed her infant age with the most tender care; for her sake they patiently bore the severest hardships; for her support they underwent the most rugged toils, in her defence they boldly encountered the most alarming dangers; neither the ravenous beasts that ranged the woods for prey, nor the more furious savages of the wilderness could damp ardour! . . . God prospered their valour, they preserved her brilliancy unsullied; they enjoyed her whilst they lived, and dying, bequeathed the dear inheritance to your care. And as they left you this glorious legacy, they have undoubtedly transmitted to you some portion of their noble spirit, to inspire you with virtue to merit her, and courage to preserve her. You surely cannot, with such examples before your eyes, as every page of the history of this country affords, suffer your liberties to be ravished from you by lawless force, or cajoled away by flattery and fraud.

The voice of your fathers' blood cries to you from the ground, my sons scorn to be slaves! In vain we met the frowns of tyrants. In vain we crossed the boisterous ocean, found a new world and prepared it for the happy residence of liberty. In vain we toiled. In vain we fought. We bled in vain, if you, our offspring, want valour to repel the assaults of her invaders! Stain not the glory of your worthy ancestors, but like them resolve never to part with your birthright; be wise in your deliberations, and determined in your exertions for the preservation of your liberties. Follow not the dictates of passion, but enlist yourselves under the sacred banner of reason; use every method in your power to secure your rights; at least prevent the curses of posterity from being heaped upon your memories.

If you, with united zeal and fortitude, oppose the torrent of oppression; if you feel the true fire of patriotism burning in your breasts; if you, from your souls, despise the most gaudy dress that slavery can wear; if you really prefer the lonely cottage (whilst blest with liberty) to gilded palaces surrounded with the ensigns of slavery, you may have the fullest assurance that tyranny, with her whole accursed train, will hide their hideous heads in confusion, shame, and despair. If you perform your part, you must have the strongest confidence that the same Almighty Being who protected your pious and venerable forefathers — who enabled them to turn a barren wilderness into a fruitful field, who so often made bare his arm for their salvation, will still be mindful of you, their offspring.

May this Almighty Being graciously preside in all our councils. May he direct us to such measures as he himself shall approve, and be pleased to bless. May we ever be a people favoured of God. May our land be a land of liberty, the seat of virtue, the asylum of the oppressed, a name and a praise in the whole earth, until the last shock of time shall bury the empires of the world in one common undistinguished ruin!

From Hezekiah Niles, ed., Centennial Offering: Republication of the Principles and Acts of the Revolution in America (New York: A. S. Barres, 1876), 753–59.

Questions for Reading and Discussion

Question

KHKvuaQo7Natgbv1PTuks3awaHYRvApva7DvysNox/nvHWtWnTMv9XAWuoiF6PbGVIsPY/EA21fAbtqjY/vRi5S5JPSy6c18Kbc9/t0g7x2PkcJn1dc4EGdr0El2UEll93fqbGxPCJxr9wRvZk3ltk4oH1+X+L9SY8aZC7QLiOBr9BdtQHK3S17Rz/3OL5qbw1cEUZfm/LiAmy+qwGH+ZZlngh3VKC2JktHHwtkEIQe+l1OqqjvVwVqolFAbhkNmsuOd/0XV5azvokjDgZ8MidVMmxhzL+R+fxYp1YMHLgWgvtLSUwZLmw==

Question

tJ6GoWr6xhn/u5AGD7PWVbxIcsOFNumDwQzoqPgWGTDINBTeFu42554N+4rcBwXQd2r6lAx80NEoLZLR0jmZElMOdyiVseYxKsNgoiTC5nLK9XjSwnWoW2Sq/xuUCpTt

Question

mEytWyxB2UTC41eryeL35Lc5IDxQXwYYqKr/ab7omqx0YtOoMf67vFDB1ejM/NpscfS0vbu9SRfAKrdbzJqVDA2lGG8Nnm06L5yVszCgdzawGbU/DfcK6ooXfTK9qd0+A9OWrsiI4+H+3zO5BHdbPE5RB9kGIteWw6/yqPkNHO9IfI9UZ5d4gz5Ts4IrkgS9aleGsChKxQaF5rZPoUV6hmjZBMwPgCQajClqT37D9Pc8evAiB7D3RUSSWr5MBxwkOueiuHXjDfda9jf6hslCZTJosr5wG7yKQTFJ72P8v3fjPOHcbZRM4pUzYaJFkzWcNBDfAze96PiAAshnrQ4ebW4PLEa510Lvgb2fMAOY+P3rxKFLkJCsgYoC8JchJ/CSsB8EnONyuy58DxNDmZE5dg==

Question

ppYnOdH4UAQvZuf1isy8OEwtNvyZ47DbPBOthJ25SZNR1BIoc6ULuOsav+fOjvP/1usIGo0y19WVAc9LeXYoWSiZk48eRv8a3WnhQ1q8qrwi1KH2m7bdsXhQ6wqAbRHx

Question

rOIArEsxsQde9O3cGDFTty0ds55ZJW78tSQgLdum8SFtDTYPm9H304h7EoIXEXV15nKGTJ4wN6ZS1OItpKuf6IPo1l37iU6dHpz0Msp03ZMDMuN9Sv5azVb+VUDSiUmoh4RypYgenBAsdz7s0H3SW+SvMmyb/VkfRATjEWIDJbDqoffiCvpdsoEg24dC1ZZ0uciM1Q==