MANY URBAN AREAS HAVE LOWER PER CAPITA ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINTS THAN AVERAGE

Due to higher population densities, less personal vehicle travel, smaller homes, and efficiencies of scale, people living in large urban areas typically have a lower ecological footprint than those in suburban areas. A 2009 study by geographer David Dodman compared the carbon footprints of various countries and large cities within those countries. Almost all of the cities evaluated had lower carbon footprints than their national average.