1.8 Understanding The Issue

CHECK YOUR UNDERSTANDING

Question 1.1

Environmental science is:

A.
B.
C.
D.

Question 1.2

According to the United Nations’ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment:

A.
B.
C.
D.

Question 1.3

Which of the following demonstrates a lack of environmental literacy?

A.
B.
C.
D.

Question 1.4

Fishing while allowing sufficient numbers to be left behind for the fish population to regenerate reflects:

A.
B.
C.
D.

Question 1.5

Which of the following is NOT an example of a social trap?

A.
B.
C.
D.

Question 1.6

Jack is opposed to the selective killing of deer that have vastly overpopulated the local forest. Jill argues that the ecosystem will be destroyed if some are not removed. While Jack is ________ as he sees deer as having intrinsic value, Jill is as _______ she values not just the species but the ecosystem processes as well.

A.
B.
C.
D.

WORK WITH IDEAS

Question 1.7

Why are environmental problems considered “wicked problems”? What factors make addressing these wicked problems a challenge?

Question 1.8

According to Jared Diamond, what are the five factors that determine whether any given society will succeed or fail? How did these factors play out for the Vikings in Greenland versus those in Iceland, and what were the consequences for each society? Provide evidence to support your conclusions.

The five factors are: natural climate change; self-inflicted environmental damage; failure to properly respond to environmental changes; hostile neighbours; and loss of friendly neighbours. The relative impact of each factor varies for every society, and the integrated impact of the five factors can determine success or failure for that particular society. In the case of Greenland, the eventual demise of the Vikings on the island can be blamed on the confluence of these five factors. First, Greenland experienced natural climate change. Studies of ice cores show that when the Vikings arrived in Greenland, the climate was unusually warm, allowing them to grow crops and raise livestock, as they had in their ancestral Norway. But over the next 500 years, the climate in Greenland cooled so much that crops failed and livestock starved. Second, the Vikings self-inflicted environmental damage: they overgrazed the land and overharvested the trees, resulting in soil erosion. Mud samples from lake beds around the Viking settlements contained large amounts of soil, blown into the lakes during Viking times, indicating that soil erosion had become a big problem long before the region descended into a mini ice-age. Third, Greenland Vikings failed to respond and adapt to their changed environment. Their middens (waste heaps) show that they continued to eat primarily cattle, sheep, and goats instead of switching to locally available and abundant fish. Fourth, they chose not to learn about fishing from their Inuit neighbours. Rather, they considered the Inuit to be hostile neighbours and had very little contact with them, as evidenced by the lack of Inuit artifacts in their settlements. And finally, as the productivity of the Greenland Viking settlements declined, so did the trade with Europeans, resulting in a loss of friendly neighbours when they needed help the most. The Icelandic Vikings differed in significant ways. Most importantly, in the face of a changing climate and with recognition of the harmful effects of their cow-farming, wood-dependent lifestyles, the Icelandic Vikings adjusted and adapted. They switched from eating beef to eating fish, they began conserving wood, and they abandoned the highlands, where soil was especially fragile. As a result, Icelandic Vikings survived and prospered.

Question 1.9

In what ways is contemporary society both similar to and different from the Greenland Viking society? What can we learn from that society’s mistakes to ensure that we do not suffer the same fate?

Question 1.10

How can human societies become more sustainable? What are the challenges to achieving sustainability?