EXAMPLE 1 Is the coffee fresh?
People of taste are supposed to prefer fres
Each of 50
To make a point, let’s compare our outcome with another possible result. If only 28 of the 50 subjects like the fresh coffee better than instant coffee, the
523
Surely 72% is stronger evidence against the skeptic’s claim than 56%. But how much stronger? Is even 72% in favor in a sample convincing evidence that a majority of the population prefer fresh coffee? Statistical tests answer these questions. Here’s the answer in outline form:
• The claim. The skeptic claims that coffee drinkers can’t tell fresh from instant so that only half will choose fres
• The sampling
mean = p = 0.5
and
= 0.0707
Figure 22.1 displays this
524
• The data. Place the sample proportion on the sampling distribution. You see in Figure 22.1 that isn’t an unusual value but that is unusual. We would rarely get 72% of a sample of 50 coffee drinkers preferring fres
• The probability. We can measure the strength of the evidence against the claim by a probability. What is the probability that a sample gives a this large or larger if the truth about the population is that p = 0.5? If , this probability is the shaded area under the Normal curve in Figure 22.1. This area is 0.20. Our sample actually gave . The probability of getting a sample outcome this large is only 0.001, an area too small to see in Figure 22.1. An outcome that would occur just by chance in 20% of all samples is not strong evidence against the claim. But an outcome that would happen only 1 in 1000 times is good evidence.