FIGURE 9.10 The Neuroscience of Risky Decision Making n a study of risky decisionI making, participants played a game in which they selected a card from one of four decks. Two of the decks were made up of riskier cards, that is, “bad” cards that provided large payoffs or large losses. The other two contained safer cards—those with much smaller payoffs and losses. At the beginning of the game, both healthy controls and people with damage to prefrontal cortex chose cards from the two decks with equal frequency. Over the course of the game, the healthy controls avoided the bad decks and showed large emotional responses (SCRs, or skin conductance responses) when they even considered choosing a card from a risky deck. Participants with prefrontal brain damage, on the other hand, continued to choose cards from the two decks with equal frequency and showed no evidence of emotional learning and eventually went bankrupt. (Data from Bechara et al., 1997.)