TABLE OF CONTENTS
Synopsis
1 of 3

Chapter 10. The A-Not-B Error

Human Development Video Activity
true
true
You must read each slide, and complete any questions on the slide, in sequence.
infant crawling away from bottle
Corbis/SuperStock

THE A-NOT-B ERROR

Estimated Completion Time:

Approximately 5 minutes.

Synopsis:

In this module, you will view a video clip that depicts infants’ limited understanding of object permanence. After the segment, you’ll be asked to reflect on alternative theories to Piaget’s explanation of the A-Not-B error.

Piaget asserted that between the ages of 8 months and one year infants have only a limited understanding of object permanence. One demonstration of this limitation, according to Piaget, can be seen in the A-Not-B test. In this test, infants who have success-
fully retrieved an object in location A and then see the object hidden in location B will tend to search for the object in location A.

8 month old fails
9 month old passes
twins, boy showing tray
© Worth Publishers

1.

Piaget’s explanation of the A-Not-B error was that before the age of 12 months, infants have only a partial grasp of object permanence. What other explanations have been offered for the A-Not-B error?

Alternative explanations for the A-Not-B error include infants’ limited memory and poor inhibitory control; their failure to recognize the difference between the A and B trials, which leads them to
do what worked before; and, as explained in Chapter 4, the influence of infants’ prior attending and reaching to location A.

Activity Completed!
Congratulations, you have completed this activity!
You have received a provisional score for your essay answers, which have been submitted to your instructor.