| Use the basic features. |
To learn more about using patterns of opposition to read critically, see Chapter 12.
Writers of position arguments often quote, paraphrase, and summarize sources. Usually, they use sources to support their positions, as Jessica Statsky does in her argument about children’s sports. Sometimes, however, they use sources to highlight opposing positions to which they will respond, as Solove does on occasion in this essay.
In the following example, Solove signals his opinion through the words he chooses to characterize the source:
As the computer-security specialist Schneier aptly notes, the nothing-to-hide argument stems from a faulty “premise that privacy is about hiding a wrong.” (par. 9)
Elsewhere, readers have to work a little harder to determine how Solove is using the source.
Solove also uses what we might call hypothetical quotations—sentences that quote not what someone actually said but what they might have said:
Many people say they’re not worried. “I’ve got nothing to hide,” they declare. “Only if you’re doing something wrong should you worry, and then you don’t deserve to keep it private.” (par. 1)
“My life’s an open book,” people might say. “I’ve got nothing to hide.” (par. 16)
Signal phrase
Hypothetical quotation
You can tell from a signal phrase like “people might say” or “many people say” that no actual person made the statement, but Solove does not always supply such cues.
Write a couple of paragraphs analyzing and evaluating Solove’s use of quotations: