Causal analysis is always shaped by the writer’s expertise and special interests. For example, Stephen King—a horror writer—has a personal investment in establishing the horror movie as a legitimate literary and cinematic form; not surprisingly, then, he emphasizes the psychological benefits of horror movies. Erica Goode, whose educational background is in social psychology, is clearly sympathetic to the work of the various psychologists and social scientists she quotes to support her claim that a variety of environmental factors contribute to how much people eat. For reasons of their own, spokespersons for the fast-food industry point to very different factors—such as lack of exercise, poor eating habits, and genetic makeup—for the increasing obesity among Americans.
Write a page or two explaining how causal analyses disguise the writer’s assumptions. In your discussion, you might do one or more of the following: