Introduction to Chapter 13
Political Transformations
Empires and Encounters 1450–1750
The Mughal Empire Among the most magnificent of the early modern empires was that of the Mughals in India. In this painting by an unknown Mughal artist, the seventeenth-century emperor Shah Jahan is holding a durbar, or ceremonial assembly, in the audience hall of his palace. The material splendor of the setting shows the immense wealth of the court, while the halo around Shah Jahan’s head indicates the special spiritual grace or enlightenment associated with emperors. Illustration from the Padshahnama, ca. 1630–1640 (bodycolour with gold on paper)/Royal Collection Trust © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, 2014/Bridgeman Images
European Empires in the Americas
The Great Dying and the Little Ice Age
Comparing Colonial Societies in the Americas
In the Lands of the Aztecs and the Incas
Settler Colonies in North America
The Steppes and Siberia: The Making of a Russian Empire
Experiencing the Russian Empire
Muslims and Hindus in the Mughal Empire
Muslims and Christians in the Ottoman Empire
Reflections: The Centrality of Context in World History
Zooming In: Doña Marina: Between Two Worlds
Zooming In: Devshirme: The “Gathering” of Christian Boys in the Ottoman Empire
Working with Evidence: State Building in the Early Modern Era
“What he [Vladimir Putin] wants to do, you can just see the lust in his eyes, he wants to re-create the Russian empire, and this move on Crimea is his first step.” So said U.S. senator Bill Nelson in March of 2014, referring to the Russian president’s actions in seizing Crimea and in pressuring Ukraine to remain within a Russian sphere of influence. In reflecting on this very current political situation, the senator, and many others as well, invoked the Russian Empire, which had taken shape during the early modern era. In the same vein, commentators on the economic and political resurgence of twenty-first-century Turkey often refer to it as an effort “to rebuild the Ottoman Empire,” likewise a creation of the early modern era.1 In such ways, the memories of these earlier empires continue to shape understanding of current events and perhaps to inspire actions in the present as well.
As these comments imply, empire building has been largely discredited during the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, and “imperialist” has become a term of insult rather than a source of pride. How very different were the three centuries (1450–1750) of the early modern era, when empire building was a global process! In the Americas, the Aztec and Inca empires flourished before they were incorporated into the rival empires of the Spanish, Portuguese, British, French, and Dutch, constructed all across the Western Hemisphere. Within those imperial systems, vast transformations took place: old societies were destroyed, and new societies arose as Native Americans, Europeans, and Africans came into sustained contact with one another for the first time in world history. It was a revolutionary encounter with implications that extended far beyond the Americas themselves.
But European empires in the Americas were not alone on the imperial stage of the early modern era. Across the immense expanse of Siberia, the Russians constructed what was then the world’s largest territorial empire, making Russia an Asian as well as a European power. Qing (chihng) dynasty China penetrated deep into Inner Asia, doubling the size of the country while incorporating millions of non-Chinese people who practiced Islam, Buddhism, or animistic religions. On the South Asian peninsula, the Islamic Mughal Empire brought Hindus and Muslims into a closer relationship than ever before, sometimes quite peacefully and at other times with great conflict. In the Middle East, the Turkish Ottoman Empire reestablished something of the earlier political unity of heartland Islam and posed a serious military and religious threat to European Christendom.
Thus the early modern era was an age of empire. Within their borders, those empires mixed and mingled diverse peoples in a wide variety of ways. Those relationships represented a new stage in the globalization process and new arenas of cross-cultural encounter. The transformations they set in motion echo still in the twenty-first century.
A MAP OF TIME |
1453 |
Ottoman conquest of Constantinople |
1464–1591 |
Songhay Empire in West Africa |
1480 |
Russia emerges from Mongol rule |
1494 |
Treaty of Tordesillas divides the Americas between Spain and Portugal |
1501 |
Safavid Empire established in Persia/Iran |
1519–1521 |
Spanish conquest of Aztec Empire |
1526 |
Mughal Empire established in India |
1529 |
Ottoman siege of Vienna |
1530s |
First Portuguese plantations in Brazil |
1532–1540 |
Spanish conquest of Inca Empire |
1550 |
Russian expansion across Siberia begins |
1565 |
Spanish takeover of Philippines begins |
1607 |
Jamestown, Virginia: first permanent English settlement in Americas
|
1608 |
French colony established in Quebec |
1680–1760 |
Chinese expansion into Inner Asia |
1683 |
Second Ottoman siege of Vienna |
After 1707 |
Fragmentation of Mughal Empire |
SEEKING THE MAIN POINT
In what ways did European empires in the Americas resemble their Russian, Chinese, Mughal, and Ottoman counterparts, and in what respects were they different? Do you find the similarities or the differences more striking?