A somewhat controversial technique for doing history before writing lies in analogies with more recent nonliterate peoples. In the twentieth century, anthropologists and other scholars descended on the few remaining gathering and hunting peoples, studying their cultures and collecting their stories, myths, and oral traditions. For good reasons, historians are often skeptical about the usefulness of such material for understanding the distant past of Paleolithic societies. Since all societies change over time, is it reasonable to think that contemporary gathering and hunting societies would resemble in any way their ancestors thousands of years ago? Furthermore, there is the problem of contamination. After all, gatherers and hunters in recent times have often mixed and mingled with agricultural societies, come under European colonial rule, or made contact with elements of modern civilization. Other scholars, particularly teachers, have embraced these materials, even while recognizing their limitations, for they provide at least a glimpse into ways of living and thinking that have almost completely vanished from the earth.
Source 1.1 allows you to make a judgment about the usefulness of this approach to history before writing by examining the work of the American anthropologist Marjorie Shostak. In 1971, she was conducting research among the San people of the Kalahari Desert on the border of Botswana and South Africa, where she became acquainted with a fifty-
Question to consider as you examine the source:
Nisa
The Life and Words of a !Kung Woman
Life in the Bush
We are people who live in the bush, and who belong in the bush. We are not village people. I have no goats. I have no cattle. I am a person who owns nothing.
That’s what people say I am: a poor person. . . .
We lived and lived, and as I kept growing, I started to carry my little brother around on my shoulders. My heart was happy then; I had grown to love him and carried him everywhere. I’d play with him for a while and whenever he would start to cry, I’d take him to Mother so he could nurse. Then I’d take him back with me and we’d play together again.
That was when Kumsa was little. But once he was older and started to talk and then to run around, that’s when we were mean to each other and hit and fought all the time. . . .
We lived in the bush and my father set traps and killed steenbok and duiker and gemsbok and we lived, eating the animals and foods of the bush. We collected food, ground it in a mortar, and ate it. We also ate sweet nin berries and tsin beans. When I was growing up, there were no cows or goats. . . .
Whenever my father killed an animal and I saw him coming home with meat draped over a stick, balanced on one shoulder — that’s what made me happy. I’d cry out, “Mommy! Daddy’s coming and he’s bringing meat!” My heart would be happy when I greeted him, “Ho, ho, Daddy! We’re going to eat meat!” Or honey. Sometimes he’d go out and come home with honey. I’d be sitting around with my mother and then see something coming from way out in the bush. I’d look hard. Then, “Oooh, Daddy found a beehive! Oh, I’m going to eat honey!”. . . And I’d thank him and call him wonderful names. . . .
When we were living in the bush, some people gave and others stinged. But there were always enough people around who shared, people who liked one another, who were happy living together, and who didn’t fight. And even if one person did stinge, the other person would just get up and yell about it, whether it was meat or anything else, “What’s doing this to you, making you not give us meat?”
When I was growing up, receiving food made my heart happy. There really wasn’t anything, other than stingy people, that made me unhappy. I didn’t like people who wouldn’t give a little of what they had. . . .
It’s the same today. Here I am, long since an adult, yet even now, if a person doesn’t give something to me, I won’t give anything to that person. . . .
Marriage
. . . The day of the wedding, everyone was there. All of Tashay’s friends were sitting around, laughing and laughing. His younger brother said, “Tashay, you’re too old. Get out of the way so I can marry her. Give her to me.” . . .
I went to my mother’s hut and sat there. I was wearing lots of beads and my hair was completely covered and full with ornaments. . . .
The next day they started [to build the marriage hut]. There were lots of people there — Tashay’s mother, my mother, and my aunt worked on the hut; everyone else sat around, talking. Late in the day, the young men went and brought Tashay to the finished hut. They set him down beside it and stayed there with him, sitting around the fire. . . .
They came and brought me back. Then they laid me down inside the hut. I cried and cried. People told me, “A man is not something that kills you; he is someone who marries you, who becomes like your father or your older brother. He kills animals and gives you things to eat.”
I listened and was quiet. Later, we went to sleep. Tashay lay down beside the opening of the hut, near the fire, and I lay down inside; he thought I might try and run away again. He covered himself with a blanket and slept. . . .
We lived and lived, the two of us, together, and after a while I started to really like him and then, to love him. I had finally grown up and had learned how to love. I thought, “A man has sex with you. Yes, that’s what a man does. I had thought that perhaps he didn’t.”
We lived on and I loved him and he loved me. I loved him the way a young adult knows how to love; I just loved him. Whenever he went away and I stayed behind, I’d miss him. I’d think, “Oh, when is my husband ever coming home? How come he’s been gone so long?” I’d miss him and want him. When he’d come back my heart would be happy, “Eh, hey! My husband left and once again has come back.”
I . . . gave myself to him, gave and gave. We lay with each other and my breasts were very large. I was becoming a woman.
Loss
It was while we were visiting in the Tswana village [of cattle-
Then I was without my husband and my heart was miserable. Every night I missed him and every night I cried, “I am without the man I married.” I thought, “Where will I see the food that will help my children grow? Who is going to help me raise this newborn? My older brother and my younger brother are far away. Who is going to help me now?”
In your heart, your child, your mother, and your father are all equal. When any one of them dies, your heart feels pain. When your child dies, you think, “How come this little thing I held beside me and watched all that she did, today has died and left me? She was the only child I had with me. . . .
The death of your parents, husband, or children — they are equal in the amount of pain you feel when you lose them. But when they all die and you have no family left, then you really feel pain. There is no one to take care of you; you are completely alone. . . .
That’s the way it is. God is the one who destroys. It isn’t people who do it. It is God himself.
Lovers
. . . Besa [Nisa’s fourth husband] and I did argue a lot, usually about sex. . . .
I didn’t leave him, not for many years. But I did have lovers and so did he. . . .
When you are a woman, you don’t just sit still and do nothing — you have lovers. You don’t just sit with the man of your hut, with just one man. One man can give you very little. One man gives you only one kind of food to eat. But when you have lovers, one brings you something and another brings you something else. One comes at night with meat, another with money, another with beads. Your husband also does things and gives them to you. But sitting with just one man? We don’t do that. Does one man have enough thoughts for you?
A Healing Ritual
. . . N/um — the power to heal — is a very good thing. This is a medicine very much like your medicine because it is strong. As your medicine helps people, our n/um helps people. But to heal with n/um means knowing how to trance. Because, it is in trance that the healing power sitting inside the healer’s body — the n/um — starts to work. Both men and women learn how to cure with it, but not everyone wants to. Trance-
You touch people, laying on hands, curing those you touch. When you finish, other people hold you and blow around your head and your face. Suddenly your senses go “Phah!” and come back to you. You think, “Eh hey, there are people here,” and you see again as you usually do. . . .
N/um is powerful, but it is also very tricky. Sometimes it helps and sometimes it doesn’t, because God doesn’t always want a sick person to get better. . . .
Eventually, I learned how to break out of myself and trance. When the drum-
Source: Digitally reproduced by permission of the publisher from NISA: THE LIFE AND WORDS OF A !KUNG WOMAN by Marjorie Shostak, pp. 37, 63, 79, 80, 138–