In this section, we derive Kepler’s laws of planetary motion, a feat first accomplished by Isaac Newton and published by him in 1687. No event was more emblematic of the scientific revolution. It demonstrated the power of mathematics to make the natural world comprehensible and it led succeeding generations of scientists to seek and discover mathematical laws governing other phenomena, such as electricity and magnetism, thermodynamics, and atomic processes.
According to Kepler, the planetary orbits are ellipses with the sun at one focus. Furthermore, if we imagine a radial vector \({\bf r}(t)\) pointing from the sun to the planet, as in Figure 13.43, then this radial vector sweeps out area at a constant rate or, as Kepler stated in his Second Law, the radial vector sweeps out equal areas in equal times (Figure 13.44). Kepler’s Third Law determines the period \(T\) of the orbit, defined as the time required to complete one full revolution. These laws are valid not just for planets orbiting the sun, but for any body orbiting about another body according to the inverse-square law of gravitation.
766
Kepler’s version of the Third Law stated only that \(T^2\) is proportional to \(a^3\). Newton discovered that the constant of proportionality is equal to \(4\pi^2/(GM)\), and he observed that if you can measure \(T\) and \(a\) through observation, then you can use the Third Law to solve for the mass \(M\). This method is used by astronomers to find the masses of the planets (by measuring \(T\) and \(a\) for moons revolving around the planet) as well as the masses of binary stars and galaxies. See Exercises 2-5.
Our derivation makes a few simplifying assumptions. We treat the sun and planet as point masses and ignore the gravitational attraction of the planets on each other. And although both the sun and the planet revolve around their mutual center of mass, we ignore the sun’s motion and assume that the planet revolves around the center of the sun. This is justified because the sun is much more massive than the planet.
We place the sun at the origin of the coordinate system. Let \({\bf r} = {\bf r}(t)\) be the position vector of a planet of mass \(m\), as in Figure 13.43, and let (Figure 13.45) \[ \ee_r = \frac{{\bf r}(t)}{\norm{{\bf r}(t)}} \] be the unit radial vector at time \(t\) (\(\ee_r\) is the unit vector that points to the planet as it moves around the sun).
By Newton’s Universal Law of Gravitation (the inverse-square law)\index{Universal Law of Gravitation}, the sun attracts the planet with a gravitational force \[ {\bf F}({\bf r}(t))= -\left(\frac{km}{\norm{{\bf r}(t)}^2}\right)\ee_r \] where \(k=GM\) (Figure 13.45). Combining the Law of Gravitation with Newton’s Second Law of Motion \({\bf F}({\bf r}(t)) = m{\bf r}”(t)\), we obtain \[ \boxed{ {\bf r}”(t) = - \frac{k}{\norm{{\bf r}(t)}^2}\, \ee_r}\tag{1} \]
Kepler’s Laws are a consequence of this differential equation.
The key to Kepler’s Second Law is the fact that the following cross product is a constant vector (even though both \({\bf r}(t)\) and \({\bf r}'(t)\) are changing in time): \[ \boxed{{\bf J} = {\bf r}(t)\times {\bf r}'(t)} \]
The vector \({\bf J}\) is constant—that is, \[ \boxed{\frac{{\bf J}}t = \mathbf{0}}\tag{2} \]
In physics, \(m{\bf J}\) is called the angular momentum vector. In situations where \({\bf J}\) is constant, we say that angular momentum is conserved. This conservation law is valid whenever the force acts in the radial direction.
767
By the Product Rule for cross products (Theorem 3 in Section 13.2) \[ \frac{{\bf J}}{t} = \frac{d}{dt} \bigl({\bf r}(t)\times{\bf r}'(t)\bigr) = {\bf r}(t)\times {\bf r}”(t) + {\bf r}'(t)\times {\bf r}'(t) \]
The cross product of parallel vectors is zero, so the second term is certainly zero. The first term is also zero because \({\bf r}”(t)\) is a multiple of \(\ee_r\) by Eq. (1),and hence also of \({\bf r}(t)\).
How can we use Eq. (1)? First of all, the cross product \({\bf J}\) is orthogonal to both \({\bf r}(t)\) and \({\bf r}'(t)\). Because \({\bf J}\) is constant, \({\bf r}(t)\) and \({\bf r}'(t)\) are confined to the fixed plane orthogonal to \({\bf J}\). This proves that the motion of a planet around the sun takes place in a plane
We can choose coordinates so that the sun is at the origin and the planet moves in the counterclockwise direction (Figure 13.46). Let \((r,\theta)\) be the polar coordinates of the planet, where \(r=r(t)\) and \(\theta=\theta(t)\) are functions of time. Note that \(r(t) = \|{\bf r}(t)\|\).
Recall from Section 11.4 (Theorem 1) that the area swept out by the planet’s radial vector is \[ A = \frac12\int_0^\theta\,r^2\,d\theta \]
Kepler’s Second Law states that this area is swept out at a constant rate. But this rate is simply \displaystyle{\hderiv{A}{t}}. By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, \displaystyle{\frac{A}{\theta} = \frac12r^2}, and by the Chain Rule, \[ \frac{A}{t} = \frac{A}{\theta}\frac{\theta}t = \frac12\theta'(t)r(t)^2 = \frac12 r(t)^2 \theta'(t) \] Thus, Kepler’s Second Law follows from the next theorem, which tells us that \(\hderiv{A}t\)has the constant value \(\frac12\norm{{\bf J}}\).
Let \(J=\norm{{\bf J}}\) (\({\bf J}\) is constant by Theorem 1). Then \[ \boxed{\bbox[#FAF8ED,5pt]{r(t)^2\theta'(t) = J}}\tag{3} \]
We note that in polar coordinates, \(\displaystyle{\ee_r = \langle \cos\theta, \sin\theta\rangle}\). We also define the unit vector \(\displaystyle{\ee_\theta = \langle {-}\sin\theta, \cos\theta\rangle}\) that is orthogonal to \(\ee_r\) (Figure13.47). In summary, \[ \boxed{ r(t) = \norm{{\bf r}(t)},\quad \ee_r = \langle \cos\theta, \sin\theta\rangle,\quad \ee_\theta = \langle -\sin\theta, \cos\theta\rangle,\quad \ee_r\cdot\ee_\theta =0 } \]
We see directly that the derivatives of \(\ee_r\) and \(\ee_\theta\) with respect to \(\theta\) are \[ \boxed{ \frac{}{\theta}\ee_r = \ee_{\theta},\qquad \frac{}{\theta}\ee_\theta = -\ee_r}\tag{4} \]
The time derivative of \(\ee_r\) is computed using the Chain Rule: \[ \ee_r' = \left(\frac{\theta}t\right)\left(\frac{}{\theta}\ee_r\right) = \theta'(t)\,\ee_\theta\tag{5} \]
Now apply the Product Rule to \({\bf r} = r\ee_r\): \[ {\bf r}' = \frac{d}{dt}\,r\ee_r = r'\ee_{r}+ r \ee'_r = r'\ee_{r}+ r\theta'\ee_\theta \]
768
Using \displaystyle{\ee_r\times \ee_{r} = {\bf 0}}, we obtain \begin{align*} \[ {\bf J} &= {\bf r}\times{\bf r}' = r\ee_r\times (r'\ee_{r}+ r\theta'\ee_\theta) = r^2\theta'(\ee_r\times\ee_{\theta}) \] \end{align*}
It is straightforward to check that \(\ee_r\times\ee_{\theta}={\bf k}\), and since \({\bf k}\) is a unit vector, \(J=\norm{{\bf J}} = |r^2\theta'|\). However, \(\theta'>0\) because the planet moves in the counterclockwise direction, so \displaystyle{J = r^2\theta'}. This proves Theorem 2
To compute cross products of vectors in the plane, such as \({\bf r}\), \(\ee_r\), and \(\ee_\theta\), we treat them as vectors in three-space with \(z\)-component equal to zero. The cross product is then a multiple of \({\bf k}\).
Let \({\bf v} = {\bf r}'(t)\) be the velocity vector. Then \({\bf r}” = {\bf v}'\) and Eq. (1) may be written \[ \frac{{\bf v}}t = - \frac{k}{r(t)^2}\, \ee_r\tag{6} \]
Eq. (1) states: \[ {\bf r}”(t) = - \frac{k}{r(t)^2}\, \ee_r \] where \({\bf r}(t)= \norm{{\bf r}(t)}\)
On the other hand, by the Chain Rule and the relation \(r(t)^2\theta'(t) =J\) of Eq. (3) \[ \frac{{\bf v}}t = \frac{\theta}{t} \frac{{\bf v}}{\theta}= \theta'(t)\frac{{\bf v}}{\theta} = \frac{J}{r(t)^2}\frac{{\bf v}}\theta \]
Together with Eq. (6), this yields \displaystyle{J\frac{{\bf v}}\theta = -k\ee_r}, or \[ \frac{{\bf v}}\theta = -\frac{k}{J}\ee_r = -\frac{k}{J}\langle \cos\theta, \sin\theta\rangle \]
This is a first-order differential equation that no longer involves time \(t\). We can solve it by integration: \[ {\bf v} = -\frac{k}{J}\int\langle \cos\theta,\sin\theta\rangle\,d\theta = \frac{k}{J}\langle-\sin\theta,\cos\theta \rangle + \boldc =\frac{k}{J}\ee_\theta+\boldc\tag{7} \] where \(\boldc\) is an arbitrary constant vector.
We are still free to rotate our coordinate system in the plane of motion, so we may assume that \(\boldc\) points along the \(y\)-axis. We can then write \(\boldc= \langle 0,(k/J)e\rangle\) for some constant \(e\). We finish the proof by computing \({\bf J}={\bf r}\times{\bf v}\): \[ {\bf J} = {\bf r}\times{\bf v} = r\ee_r\times \left(\frac{k}{J}\ee_\theta + \boldc\right) = \frac{k}{J}r\big(\ee_r\times\ee_{\theta} + \ee_r\times \langle 0,e\rangle\big) \]
Direct calculation yields \[ \ee_r\times\ee_{\theta}={\bf k},\qquad \ee_r\times \langle 0,e\rangle = (e\cos\theta){\bf k} \] so our equation becomes \displaystyle{{\bf J} = \frac{k}{J}r (1 + e\cos\theta ){\bf k}}. Since \({\bf k}\) is a unit vector, \[ J = \norm{{\bf J}} = \frac{k}{J}r\big(1+e\cos\theta\big) \]
The equation of a conic section in polar coordinates is discussed in Section 11.5
Solving for \(r\), we obtain the polar equation of a conic section of eccentricity \(e\) (an ellipse, parabola, or hyperbola): \[ r = \frac{J^2/k}{1+e\cos\theta} \]
This result shows that if a planet travels around the sun in a bounded orbit, then the orbit must be an ellipse. There are also “open orbits” that are either parabolic and hyperbolic. They describe comets that pass by the sun and then continue into space, never to return. In our derivation, we assumed implicitly that \({\bf J}\ne \mathbf{0}\). If \({\bf J}={\bf 0}\), then \(\theta'(t)=0\). In this case, the orbit is a straight line, and the planet falls directly into the sun.
Kepler’s Third Law is verified in Exercises 23 and 24.
769
We exploited the fact that \({\bf J}\) is constant to prove the law of ellipses without ever finding a formula for the position vector \({\bf r}(t)\) of the planet as a function of time \(t\). In fact, \({\bf r}(t)\) cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions. This illustrates an important principle: Sometimes it is possible to describe solutions of a differential equation even if we cannot write them down explicitly.
The astronomers of the ancient world (Babylon, Egypt, and Greece) mapped out the nighttime sky with impressive accuracy, but their models of planetary motion were based on the erroneous assumption that the planets revolve around the earth. Although the Greek astronomer Aristarchus (310‒230 bce) had suggested that the earth revolves around the sun, this idea was rejected and forgotten for nearly eighteen centuries, until the Polish astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus (1473‒1543) introduced a revolutionary set of ideas about the solar system, including the hypothesis that the planets revolve around the sun. Copernicus paved the way for the next generation, most notably Tycho Brahe (1546‒1601), Galileo Galilei (1564‒1642), and Johannes Kepler (1571‒1630).
The Hubble Space Telescope produced this image of the Antenna galaxies, a pair of spiral galaxies that began to collide hundreds of millions of years ago.
The German astronomer Johannes Kepler was the son of a mercenary soldier who apparently left his family when Johannes was 5 and may have died at war. He was raised by his mother in his grandfather’s inn. Kepler’s mathematical brilliance earned him a scholarship at the University of Tübingen and at age of 29, he went to work for the Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe, who had compiled the most complete and accurate data on planetary motion then available. When Brahe died in 1601, Kepler succeeded him as “Imperial Mathematician” to the Holy Roman Emperor, and in 1609 he formulated the first two of his laws of planetary motion in a work entitled Astronomia Nova (New Astronomy).
In the centuries since Kepler’s death, as observational data improved, astronomers found that the planetary orbits are not exactly elliptical. Furthermore, the perihelion (the point on the orbit closest to the sun) shifts slowly over time (Figure 13.48). Most of these deviations can be explained by the mutual pull of the planets, but the perihelion shift of Mercury is larger than can be accounted for by Newton’s Laws. On November 18, 1915,Albert Einstein made a discovery about which he later wrote to a friend, “I was beside myself with ecstasy for days.”Hehad been working for a decade on his famous General Theory of Relativity, a theory that would replace Newton’s law of gravitation with a new set of much more complicated equations called the Einstein Field Equations. On that 18th of November, Einstein showed that Mercury’s perihelion shift was accurately explained by his new theory. At the time, this was the only substantial piece of evidence that the General Theory of Relativity was correct.
770