An All-Out Commitment in Vietnam

Printed Page 876

Section Chronology

The president who wanted to make his mark on domestic policy was compelled to deal with the commitments his predecessors had made in Vietnam. Some advisers, politicians, and international leaders questioned the wisdom of greater intervention there, viewing the situation as a civil war rather than Communist aggression. Most U.S. allies did not consider Vietnam crucial to containing communism and were not prepared to share the military burden. Senate majority leader Mike Mansfield wondered whether Vietnam could be won with a “limited expenditure of American lives and resources somewhere commensurate with our national interests.” Disregarding the opportunity for disengagement that these critics saw in 1964, Johnson expressed his own doubt privately: “I don’t think it’s worth fighting for and I don’t think we can get out.”

CHAPTER LOCATOR

How did U.S. foreign policy change under Kennedy?

Why did Johnson escalate American involvement in Vietnam?

How did the war in Vietnam polarize the nation?

How did U.S. foreign policy change under Nixon?

Conclusion: Was Vietnam an unwinnable war?

image LearningCurve

Check what you know.

Like Kennedy, Johnson remembered how Harry Truman had suffered politically when the Communists took over China. Along with most of his advisers, Johnson believed that American credibility was on the line, and he believed that conceding defeat in Vietnam would undermine his ability to achieve his Great Society.

Johnson understood the ineffectiveness of his South Vietnamese allies and agonized over sending young men into combat. Yet he continued to dispatch more military advisers, weapons, and economic aid and, in August 1964, seized an opportunity to increase the pressure on North Vietnam. While spying in the Gulf of Tonkin, off the coast of North Vietnam, two U.S. destroyers reported that North Vietnamese gunboats had fired on them (see Map 29.2). Johnson quickly ordered air strikes on North Vietnamese torpedo bases and oil storage facilities. Concealing the uncertainty about whether the second attack had even occurred, he won from Congress the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, authorizing him to take “all necessary measures to repel any armed attacks against the forces of the United States and to prevent further aggression.”

Gulf of Tonkin Resolution

image Resolution passed by Congress in 1964 in the wake of a naval confrontation in the Gulf of Tonkin. It gave the president virtually unlimited authority in conducting the Vietnam War. The Senate terminated the resolution following outrage over the U.S. invasion of Cambodia in 1970.

Soon after winning the election of 1964, Johnson widened the war. He rejected peace overtures from North Vietnam, which insisted on American withdrawal and a coalition government in South Vietnam as steps toward unification of the country. In February 1965, Johnson authorized Operation Rolling Thunder, a strategy of gradually intensified bombing of North Vietnam. Less than a month later, Johnson ordered the first U.S. combat troops to South Vietnam, and in July he shifted U.S. troops from defensive to offensive operations, dispatching 50,000 more soldiers (Figure 29.1). Although the administration downplayed the import of these decisions, they marked a critical turning point. Now it was genuinely America’s war.

image
FIGURE 29.1 U.S. Troops in Vietnam, 1962–1972
The steepest increases in the American military presence in Vietnam came with Johnson’s escalation of the war in 1965 and 1966. Although Nixon reduced troop levels significantly in 1971 and 1972, the United States continued massive bombing attacks.