Additional Assignment
Sequences
ADDITIONAL SEQUENCE ONE
Deliberate Acts of Discovery
Jonathan Lethem
Kathleen Jamie
John Berger
Joshua Foer
ALTERNATIVE READINGS
Kathryn Schulz
Judith Halberstam
In our introduction to Ways of Reading, we write:
Sometimes, with particularly difficult readings, we ask students to mark words, names, or phrases that they think would be useful hyperlinks — moments in the text where you wish you could click on the word or phrase in order to find out more. If you try this on your first read-through, you might learn something important; you might learn what you don’t yet know about the text. Often times, being an engaged reader means paying attention both to what is familiar and what is unfamiliar about what you are reading. (p. 8 of the print book)
In this sequence, you will spend time as a reader who researches more deeply, a reader who creates “hyperlinks” as you read and after you read, a reader who follows the paths of what she does not know as opposed to a reader who latches on to what is familiar. In this process, it is our hope you might discover some surprising connections and some more layered ways of reading texts — especially texts that make references to words, ideas, places, and names that are not immediately recognizable to you or that you know very little about. Sometimes you may even find that you recognize a reference but that you are unsure how the reference is significant in a given essay. This sequence invites you to explore the range of materials writers use, to examine these materials with more deliberate acts of discovery — using both online and library resources to do the work of becoming fluent in the language and references of the essays you read.
ASSIGNMENT 1
Creating Hyperlinks
JONATHAN LETHEM
One of the pleasures of Lethem’s essay “The Ecstasy of Influence” is its broad range of reference. This is also one of the essay’s strategies — to range quickly and widely among examples of influence in literature, music, the visual arts, and popular culture. Lethem refers, for example, to the Disney Studios, the Oulipo group, Bob Dylan, Vladimir Nabokov, Shakespeare, T.S. Eliot, South Park, Muddy Waters, Andy Warhol, and Led Zeppelin — to name just a few. As you read through Lethem’s essay the first time, keep a list of his range of materials. Mark those materials you don’t know much about. Then, once you’ve read Lethem’s essay, go in search of the history and meanings of each of the items on your list. Read widely online or in the library itself as much as you can about these references — taking notes on what you might tell readers if you were asked to write a hyperlink for each of these references. This may take you some time; you might even gather with a small group in your class to help one another find the information you need.
Once you’ve gathered your list and recorded your notes, reread Lethem’s essay again, noting how your reading of the essay has changed or is enriched by your new understandings after your research.
Write an essay in which you discuss how your first reading of Lethem’s essay was different from your second reading. How is your reading shaped by the depth of your knowledge about Lethem’s references? You will want to focus specifically on 1 to 2 examples, explaining to your reader how those examples illuminate the difference in your first and second readings of Lethem. Finally, after doing this more extensive research and rereading Lethem’s essay, what might you want to say about reading more broadly? How has this experience been the same as or different from your other reading experiences? What does knowing more about an essay’s frames of references bring to your reading?
ASSIGNMENT 2
Zoning In
KATHLEEN JAMIE
Kathleen Jamie’s essay “Shia Girls” is quite different from the first essay you examined in this sequence. For this reason, this assignment asks you to do similar work in informing yourself about the essay’s landscape, the terms and names that are its lexicon. “Shia Girls” takes us into writing that resembles both a travelogue and a personal essay. As such, it invites readers unfamiliar with its geographies, traditions, and terms to research them — to learn, for example, what the town of Gilgit in Pakistan looks like, the meaning of “Inshallah” and “purdah-observing,” the description and role of a “black dupatta” and “shalwar-kameez,” the beliefs of Shia people, and the position and policies of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto.
As you reread “Shia Girls,” make a running list of unfamiliar places, names, and terms. From this list, choose several items you want to learn more about. Use the Internet and other resources to find out as much as you can about these items.
Write an essay in which you discuss what you learned about each item and how this research affects your reading of “Shia Girls.” In this assignment, you might also consider questions about references more broadly. For instance, why isn’t Jamie responsible for providing this information for you? What does it mean to take responsibility for your own gaps in knowledge? What drives readers to decide to research some details and ignore others?
ASSIGNMENT 3
Field Research
JOHN BERGER
“Images may be like words,” Berger says, rather than holy relics. As words, they communicate meaning to us. For this assignment, examine Michelangelo da Caravaggio’s painting "Supper at Emmaus". This is the painting that Berger shows to the children to spark their discussion. And, like Berger in the video with the children looking at a reproduction of this Caravaggio painting, you’ll need a small group of people to look at it and to talk about what it means to them. Before you do that, write a two- to three-paragraph explanation of what you think the painting is about. You’ll return to this after the discussion when you write an essay about this experiment.
Examine the painting with your small group. Ask them what they think the painting might be about, or what they see, or what it means to them. Take notes on the conversation. Then write an essay in which you explore what they said about the painting. What surprised you? What did you see that they didn’t? How is your explanation different from theirs? Would you conclude that the painting spoke to them as Berger suggests it would? How does trying out your own field research on one of Berger’s materials influence your reading of his essay?
ASSIGNMENT 4
Becoming an Expert Reader
JOSHUA FOER
In this lecture, Joshua Foer discusses the existence of an “OK Plateau,” a kind of state of mind in which humans consider themselves “good enough.” Foer advocates for moving beyond this state of mind and becoming an expert. He says, “Experts step outside their comfort zone and study themselves failing… They crave and thrive on immediate and constant feedback.”
Watch this lecture and write an essay in which you explore the idea of “expertise” as it connects to both Foer’s lecture and the chapter you’ve read here. What, for Joshua Foer, constitutes an “expert”? What are the possibilities and limits in thinking of experts and expertise in the ways Foer articulates? In what subject or topic is Joshua Foer (or other mental athletes who compete in memory decathlons) an expert? Do you believe he is an expert according to your own definition of that term? How has this sequence invited you to become more of an expert on the essays you’ve read? What might it mean to be an expert reader?
ASSIGNMENT 5
Building Your Own Frame of References
JONATHAN LETHEM, KATHLEEN JAMIE, JOHN BERGER, JOSHUA FOER
Look back at a few of the essays you read in this sequence. Pay particular attention to the ways each writer makes use of the materials they examine and draw from. Then compose an essay that similarly draws from a range of materials. This essay can be about anything you like, but you want to draw from a wide range of sources that help you compose the essay. The essay might make an argument, tell a story, or raise an important question. The only requirement is that you use a variety of materials — names, places, terms, references — to help you layer and complicate your writing. If you want to get more playful with the assignment, you might even try to reuse some of the references you learned about in earlier assignments. In what essay would you, for example, use a reference to Andy Warhol or South Park? This is a difficult assignment because it requires that you come up with the content of your essay. We offer only the structural constraint of using five different references or materials in the essay.
Once you’ve composed your essay, write a brief postscript in which you describe just how you went about making use of the range of materials you mentioned.How do you imagine a reader who knows the references having a different experience than a reader who does not know them? What did your range of materials allow you to do as a writer? What did it prevent you from doing?
ALTERNATIVE ASSIGNMENT
Frame of Reference
JUDITH HALBERSTAM
Although Halberstam makes references to films, words, and ideas that are likely familiar to you, other words or names may seem strikingly unfamiliar, even strange. In the spirit of failure, choose a term, a reference, or a name from “Animating Revolt and Revolting Animation” (p. 269 of the print book) that you did not understand or were unfamiliar with. Then find out, in a digital search, as much as you possibly can about that term or reference.
As you read about the term, think about why you have not heard it before. Then write an essay in which you consider the following questions: Why might this term or reference have been out of your line of sight or experience? How does knowing more about it help inform your reading of Halberstam? In other words, what can this term or reference illuminate about the reading that you might not have seen before knowing more about it?
ALTERNATIVE ASSIGNMENT
Key Figures
KATHRYN SCHULZ
One of the pleasures of Schulz’s book is its broad range of reference and the easy passage from anecdote and journalistic account to her reading in various fields of academic research — from philosophy to cognitive science to the history of ideas to current events. There are several key figures in “Evidence,” (p. 360 of the print book) and among them are Rene Descartes, St. Augustine, Willard Van Orman Quine, Karl Popper, and Thomas Kuh.
As you read through Schultz’s essay the first time, keep a list of her key figures. Mark those you don’t know much about. Then, once you’ve read Schultz’s essay, go in search of the history and significance of these names. Read widely online or in the library itself as much as you can about these references — taking notes on what you might tell readers if you were asked to write a “hyperlink” for each of these references. This may take some time; you might even gather with a small group in your class to help one another find the information you need.
Once you’ve gathered your list and recorded your notes, reread Schultz’s essay, noting how your reading of the essay has changed or is enriched by your new understandings after your research.
Then, write an essay in which you discuss how your first reading of Schultz’s essay was different from your second reading. How is your reading shaped by the depth of your knowledge about these figures? You will want to focus specifically on one to two examples, explaining to your reader how those examples illuminate the difference in your first and second readings of Schultz. Finally, after doing this more extensive research and rereading the essay, what might you want to say about reading more broadly? How has this experience been the same as or different from your other reading experiences? What does knowing more about an essay’s frames of references bring to your reading?