Read the following passage and the information about its source. Then decide whether each student sample is plagiarized or uses the source correctly. If the student sample is plagiarized, click on Plagiarized; if the sample is acceptable, click on OK.

Click Submit after each question to see feedback and to record your answer. After you have finished every question, your answers will be submitted to your instructor’s gradebook. You may review your answers by returning to the exercise at any time. (An exercise reports to the gradebook only if your instructor has assigned it.)

For help with this exercise, see Avoiding plagiarism.

ORIGINAL SOURCE

Unaccountable power always breeds resentment, especially when it is money power. The Rothschilds were demonized in Europe in much the same way as J. P. Morgan was in the United States—only more so, because they were Jewish. The myth of their omnipotence, in which they themselves sometimes believed, bred a virulent anti-Semitism, which fastened onto a uniquely visible Jewish family. To conservatives the Rothschilds were a standing threat to the established hierarchy; to socialists they stood for unbridled exploitation of the worker. Long after their power had disappeared, Hitler combined the two strands into a lethal cocktail, when he referred to the “rapacity of a Rothschild, who financed war and revolutions and brought the peoples into interest-servitude through loans.” The origins of Auschwitz can be traced in part to this fateful coupling.

From Skidelsky, Robert. “Family Values.” Review of The House of Rothschild: The World’s Banker, 1849-1999 and The House of Rothschild: Money’s Prophets, 1789-1848, both by Niall Ferguson. New York Review of Books, December 16, 1999, 24-29.

[The source passage is from page 24.]

1 of 10

Question

2 of 10

Question

3 of 10

Question

4 of 10

Question

5 of 10

Question

6 of 10

Question

7 of 10

Question

8 of 10

Question

9 of 10

Question

10 of 10

Question