Chapter 1. Chapter 1

1.1 Gladwell, Malcolm. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Little, Brown and Company, 2013, pp. 152-153.

Chapter 1a
Chapter 1a
true
true

In the early 1970s, a group of social scientists at Stanford University, led by Philip Zimbardo, decided to create a mock prison in the basement of the university’s psychology building. They took a thirty-five-foot section of corridor and created a cell block with a prefabricated wall. Three small, six- by nine-foot cells were created from laboratory rooms and given steel-barred, black-painted doors. A closet was turned into a solitary confinement cell. The group then advertised in the local papers for volunteers, men who would agree to participate in the experiment. Seventy-five people applied, and from those Zimbardo and his colleagues picked the 21 who appeared the most normal and healthy on psychological tests. Half of the group were chosen, at random, to be guards, and were given uniforms and dark glasses and told that their responsibility was to keep order in the prison. The other half were told that they were to be prisoners. Zimbardo got the Palo Alto Police Department to “arrest” the prisoners in their homes, cuff them, bring them to the station, charge them with a fictitious crime, fingerprint them, then blindfold them and bring them to the prison in the Psychology Department basement. Then they were stripped and give a prison uniform to wear, with a number on the front and back that was to serve as their only means of identification for the duration of their incarceration.

Question

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

Question

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

Konnikova, M. (2015, June 12). The real lesson of the Stanford prison experiment. The New Yorker. Retrieved from The New Yorker.

This article examines a new film about the prison experiment. I’ll use it to support my discussion of the long term cultural impact of the experiment.