1. Demographic Catastrophe

1.
Demographic Catastrophe

The Black Death (Fourteenth Century)

Few events in history have had such a shattering impact on every aspect of society as the plague, which reached Europe in 1347. The Black Death decimated a society already weakened by a demographic crisis, famines, and climatic disasters. It is estimated that one-third of Europe’s population died in the first wave of plague, which was followed by repeated outbreaks. Some cities may have lost over half their people in 1347–1348 alone. Though the devastation was social, psychological, economic, political, and even artistic, many historians believe that in the long term the plague led to significant changes and even improvements in Western life. The following documents describe the arrival of the plague in various places and responses to it, including searches for its cause and people on whom to fix blame. The plague ultimately precipitated much of the crisis that characterized the fourteenth century.

From Rosemary Horrox, ed. and trans., The Black Death (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1994), 16–21, 23, 194–97, 207, 208, 219–22.

From Ordinances against the Spread of Plague, Pistoia

2 May, 1348

1. So that the sickness which is now threatening the region around Pistoia shall be prevented from taking hold of the citizens of Pistoia, no citizen or resident of Pistoia, wherever they are from or of what condition, status or standing they may be, shall dare or presume to go to Pisa or Lucca; and no one shall come to Pistoia from those places; penalty 500 pence. And no one from Pistoia shall receive or give hospitality to people who have come from those places; same penalty. And the guards who keep the gates of the city of Pistoia shall not permit anyone travelling to the city from Pisa or Lucca to enter; penalty 10 pence from each of the guards responsible for the gate through which such an entry has been made. But citizens of Pistoia now living within the city may go to Pisa and Lucca, and return again, if they first obtain permission from the common council—who will vote on the merits of the case presented to them. The licence is to be drawn up by the notary of the anziani and gonfalonier of the city.1 And this ordinance is to be upheld and observed from the day of its ratification until 1 October, or longer if the council sees fit.

2. No one, whether from Pistoia or elsewhere, shall dare or presume to bring or fetch to Pistoia, whether in person or by an agent, any old linen or woollen cloths, for male or female clothing or for bedspreads; penalty 200 pence, and the cloth to be burnt in the public piazza of Pistoia by the official who discovered it.2 However it shall be lawful for citizens of Pistoia travelling within Pistoia and its territories to take linen and woollen cloths with them for their own use or wear, provided that they are in a pack or fardle weighing 30 lb or less. And this ordinance to be upheld and observed from the day of its ratification until 1 January. And if such cloth has already been brought into Pistoia, the bringer must take it away within three days of the ordinance’s ratification; same penalty.

3. The bodies of the dead shall not be removed from the place of death until they have been enclosed in a wooden box, and the lid of planks nailed down3 so that no stench can escape, and covered with no more than one pall, coverlet or cloth; penalty 50 pence to be paid by the heirs of the deceased or, if there are no heirs, by the nearest kinsmen in the male line. The goods of the deceased are to stand as surety for the payment of the penalty. Also the bodies are to be carried to burial in the same box; same penalty. So that the civic officials can keep a check on this, the rectors of the chapels in Pistoia must notify the podestà and capitano when a corpse is brought into their chapel, giving the dead man’s name and the contrada in which he was living when he died; same penalty. As soon as he has been notified, the podestà or capitano must send an official to the place, to find out whether this chapter of the ordinances is being observed, along with the other regulations governing funerals, and to punish those found guilty. And if the podestà or capitano is remiss in carrying out these orders he must be punished by those who appointed him; same penalty. But these regulations should not apply to the poor and destitute of the city, who are dealt with under another civic ordinance.

4. To avoid the foul stench which comes from dead bodies each grave shall be dug two and a half armslength deep, as this is reckoned in Pistoia;4 penalty 10 pence from anyone digging or ordering the digging of a grave which infringes the statute.

5. No one, of whatever condition, status or standing, shall dare or presume to bring a corpse into the city, whether coffined or not; penalty 25 pence. And the guards at the gates shall not allow such bodies to be brought into the city; same penalty, to be paid by every guard responsible for the gate through which the body was brought.

6. Any person attending a funeral shall not accompany the corpse or its kinsmen further than the door of the church where the burial is to take place, or go back to the house where the deceased lived, or to any other house on that occasion; penalty 10 pence. Nor is he to go [to] the week’s mind of the deceased; same penalty.5

7. When someone dies, no one shall dare or presume to give or send any gift to the house of the deceased, or to any other place on that occasion, either before or after the funeral, or to visit the house, or eat there on that occasion; penalty 25 pence. This shall not apply to the sons and daughters of the deceased, his blood brothers and sisters and their children, or to his grandchildren. The podestà and capitano, when notified by the rector as in chapter 3, must send an official to enquire whether anything has been done to the contrary and to punish those responsible.

From Gabriele de’ Mussis (d. 1356), a Lawyer in Piacenza

In 1346, in the countries of the East, countless numbers of Tartars and Saracens were struck down by a mysterious illness which brought sudden death. . . . An eastern settlement under the rule of the Tartars called Tana, which lay to the north of Constantinople and was much frequented by Italian merchants, was totally abandoned after an incident there which led to its being besieged and attacked by hordes of Tartars who gathered in a short space of time. The Christian merchants, who had been driven out by force, were so terrified of the power of the Tartars that, to save themselves and their belongings, they fled in an armed ship to Caffa, a settlement in the same part of the world which had been founded long ago by the Genoese.

Oh God! See how the heathen Tartar races, pouring together from all sides, suddenly invested the city of Caffa and besieged the trapped Christians there for almost three years. There, hemmed in by an immense army, they could hardly draw breath, although food could be shipped in, which offered them some hope. But behold, the whole army was affected by a disease which overran the Tartars and killed thousands upon thousands every day. It was as though arrows were raining down from heaven to strike and crush the Tartars’ arrogance. All medical advice and attention was useless; the Tartars died as soon as the signs of disease appeared on their bodies: swellings in the armpit or groin caused by coagulating humors, followed by a putrid fever.

The dying Tartars, stunned and stupefied by the immensity of the disaster brought about by the disease, and realizing that they had no hope of escape, lost interest in the siege. But they ordered corpses to be placed in catapults and lobbed into the city in the hope that the intolerable stench would kill everyone inside. What seemed like mountains of dead were thrown into the city, and the Christians could not hide or flee or escape from them, although they dumped as many of the bodies as they could in the sea. And soon the rotting corpses tainted the air and poisoned the water supply, and the stench was so overwhelming that hardly one in several thousand was in a position to flee the remains of the Tartar army. Moreover, one infected man could carry the poison to others, and infect people and places with the disease by look alone. No one knew, or could discover, a means of defense.

Thus almost everyone who had been in the East, or in the regions to the south and north, fell victim to sudden death after contracting this pestilential disease, as if struck by a lethal arrow which raised a tumor on their bodies. The scale of the mortality and the form which it took persuaded those who lived, weeping and lamenting, through the bitter events of 1346 to 1348—the Chinese, Indians, Persians, Medes, Kurds, Armenians, Cilicians, Georgians, Mesopotamians, Nubians, Ethiopians, Turks, Egyptians, Arabs, Saracens and Greeks (for almost all the East has been affected) that the last judgment had come. . . .

As it happened, among those who escaped from Caffa by boat were a few sailors who had been infected with the poisonous disease. Some boats were bound for Genoa, others went to Venice and to other Christian areas. When the sailors reached these places and mixed with the people there, it was as if they had brought evil spirits with them: every city, every settlement, every place was poisoned by the contagious pestilence. . . .

Scarcely one in seven of the Genoese survived. In Venice, where an inquiry was held into the mortality, it was found that more than 70 percent of the people had died, and that within a short period 20 out of 24 excellent physicians had died. The rest of Italy, Sicily and Apulia and the neighboring regions maintain that they have been virtually emptied of inhabitants. The people of Florence, Pisa and Lucca, finding themselves bereft of their fellow residents, emphasize their losses. The Roman Curia at Avignon, the provinces on both sides of the Rhône, Spain, France, and the Empire cry up their griefs and disasters—all of which makes it extraordinarily difficult for me to give an accurate picture.

By contrast, what befell the Saracens can be established from trustworthy accounts. In the city of Babylon alone (the heart of the Sultan’s power), 480,000 of his subjects are said to have been carried off by the disease in less than three months in 1348—and this is known from the Sultan’s register which records the names of the dead, because he receives a gold bezant for each person buried. . . .

I am overwhelmed, I can’t go on. Everywhere one turns there is death and bitterness to be described. The hand of the Almighty strikes repeatedly, to greater and greater effect. The terrible judgment gains power as time goes by.

From Herman Gigas, a Franciscan Friar in Germany, Whose Account Goes until 1349

In 1347 there was such a great pestilence and mortality throughout almost the whole world that in the opinion of well-informed men scarcely a tenth of mankind survived. The victims did not linger long, but died on the second or third day. . . . Some say that it was brought about by the corruption of the air; others that the Jews planned to wipe out all the Christians with poison and had poisoned wells and springs everywhere. And many Jews confessed as much under torture: that they had bred spiders and toads in pots and pans, and had obtained poison from overseas; and that not every Jew knew about this, only the more powerful ones, so that it would not be betrayed. . . . [M]en say that bags full of poison were found in many wells and springs.

From Heinrich Truchess, a Former Papal Chaplain and Canon of Constance

The persecution of the Jews began in November 1348, and the first outbreak in Germany was at Sölden, where all the Jews were burnt on the strength of a rumor that they had poisoned wells and rivers, as was afterwards confirmed by their own confessions and also by the confessions of Christians whom they had corrupted. . . . Within the revolution of one year, that is from All Saints [1 November] 1348 until Michaelmas [29 September] 1349 all the Jews between Cologne and Austria were burnt and killed for this crime, young men and maidens and the old along with the rest. And blessed be God who confounded the ungodly who were plotting the extinction of his church.

Papal Bull “Sicut Judeis” of Clement VI Issued in July 1348

Recently, however, it has been brought to our attention by public fame—or more accurately, infamy—that numerous Christians are blaming the plague with which God, provoked by their sins, has afflicted the Christian people, on poisonings carried out by the Jews at the instigation of the devil, and that out of their own hot-headedness they have impiously slain many Jews, making no exception for age or sex; and that the Jews have been falsely accused of such outrageous behavior. . . . [I]t cannot be true that the Jews, by such a heinous crime, are the cause or occasion of the plague, because throughout many parts of the world the same plague, by the hidden judgment of God, has afflicted and afflicts the Jews themselves and many other races who have never lived alongside them.

We order you by apostolic writing that each of you upon whom this charge has been laid, should straitly command those subject to you, both clerical and lay . . . not to dare (on their own authority or out of hot-headedness) to capture, strike, wound or kill any Jews or expel them from their service on these grounds; and you should demand obedience under pain of excommunication.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

  1. What explanations do these documents offer for the onset of plague? What do they suggest about the extent of Europeans’ understanding of the disease and how it spread?

    Question

    WMCmmFNIho9FXCPbX6pqbvVtrWygvBzQWxz6MVmLZz/Fn0Go/S1bNrzFy6UPvqPwUQUkW9u42hThZIVpI4TfkQOlD2eM34qXD+MQeLvXgaWO04b3nnukaeD3L6i69pgarYfQ+tWD6iW4YyC8/qTfpkCPKGKsUxHYc/QxjUP92p0ZzBYndh00TSWdw4q+RwUHQYwf15Xtzv4isvpmauVLAsmqkhJTmySGOoLOsQpmMuR7vVr4owNnSQPbZHfEewZgb3U50Qn361PQLbvCVnqmXkks26w=
    What explanations do these documents offer for the onset of plague? What do they suggest about the extent of Europeans’ understanding of the disease and how it spread?
  2. What strategies did the city of Pistoia adopt to prevent the spread of infection? How did those strategies differ from the ones described by Herman Gigas and Heinrich Truchess?

    Question

    W12clzeJyrnUiM2awvtKhSxwlNkVXjiDD4+cXHpoaRQ2Ymb67c6eUXRJF5ecnwEI5QKYtwzhvNSt/x7WgGiuwUKzEBeYkdiDZGPovzlg1trn0PM18++CegAKbK/Z6B2vMJNqn8R0382RSiw0ACI1TVmNglpoF2Jo6YrGXGNTpC8+Y9LAORiW9yRSSODKTdxxZAu9Xvl58wXv2T5HN4bxfgeeOHEcJuIRuqui+hMZ9X0EPxWr/aNy67FmCMSTrqiQYBRArADy7A/048cDqVMwgT5XgBaiq3TyHP/YAQ==
    What strategies did the city of Pistoia adopt to prevent the spread of infection? How did those strategies differ from the ones described by Herman Gigas and Heinrich Truchess?
  3. What do the accounts by Mussis and the bull of Pope Clement VI have in common? How did different groups of people react to the plague?

    Question

    7u8KUlC/dAAbXq8G3xZ16nW+B2PeOWn8ztFBtoTSk1RSl8dUQ+sejaZxe9qA/mrSO2VtT5DI0wyO/peNKnx3kxmFfiN0ZnuVQYddT2CTAPg9Rx8HJM3hfcpTHcI/QTvli0k0UBvleUjM1q94xdIfr1rNke3bY4QelW95lo3BzCjBbNOtyqdLEAd0Rp3Xb20em7enkXkOzXVlQClRaCioVqcOOWq726WM1bs1zBfoHn4=
    What do the accounts by Mussis and the bull of Pope Clement VI have in common? How did different groups of people react to the plague?