4. A Call for Women’s Inclusion

4.
A Call for Women’s Inclusion

Olympe de Gouges, Declaration of the Rights of Woman (1791)

Like millions of her fellow French citizens, Olympe de Gouges (1748–1793) had high hopes that the National Assembly would reshape French society for everyone’s betterment. To her dismay and that of many other French women, the Assembly did little to extend the Revolution’s ideal of equality to women. Not only were they denied the right to vote, women also lacked legal equality within marriage, the right to divorce, and the right to own property. Although de Gouges had already made a name for herself by writing several plays and pamphlets on the convening of the Estates General in 1789, the manifesto below secured her reputation as one of the most influential feminist writers of the revolutionary period. Drawing on Enlightenment ideals and a well-established French feminist tradition, de Gouges took the title of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen at face value and directly challenged its exclusion of women by writing a declaration for them. Even women less radical than de Gouges embraced her call to action. They organized festivals of freedom, workshops, and clubs, and offered prizes for recitations of the declaration. De Gouges remained a vocal voice on the political scene in Paris until November 1793, when she was sentenced to death for criticizing the newly established government of Maximilien Robespierre.

From Darline Gay Levy, Harriet Branson Applewhite, Mary Durham Johnson, eds. and trans., Women in Revolutionary Paris, 1789–1795 (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1979), 89–92.

The Rights of Woman

Man, are you capable of being just? It is a woman who poses the question; you will not deprive her of that right at least. Tell me, what gives you sovereign empire to oppress my sex? Your strength? Your talents? Observe the Creator in his wisdom; survey in all her grandeur that nature with whom you seem to want to be in harmony, and give me, if you dare, an example of this tyrannical empire. Go back to animals, consult the elements, study plants, finally glance at all the modifications of organic matter, and surrender to the evidence when I offer you the means; search, probe, and distinguish, if you can, the sexes in the administration of nature. Everywhere you will find them mingled; everywhere they cooperate in harmonious togetherness in this immortal masterpiece.

Man alone has raised his exceptional circumstances to a principle. Bizarre, blind, bloated with science and degenerated—in a century of enlightenment and wisdom—into the crassest ignorance, he wants to command as a despot a sex which is in full possession of its intellectual faculties; he pretends to enjoy the Revolution and to claim his rights to equality in order to say nothing more about it.

Declaration of the Rights of Woman and the Female Citizen

For the National Assembly to decree in its last sessions, or in those of the next legislature:

Preamble

Mothers, daughters, sisters [and] representatives of the nation demand to be constituted into a national assembly. Believing that ignorance, omission, or scorn for the rights of woman are the only causes of public misfortunes and of the corruption of governments, [the women] have resolved to set forth in a solemn declaration the natural, inalienable, and sacred rights of woman in order that this declaration, constantly exposed before all the members of the society, will ceaselessly remind them of their rights and duties; in order that the authoritative acts of women and the authoritative acts of men may be at any moment compared with and respectful of the purpose of all political institutions; and in order that citizens’ demands, henceforth based on simple and incontestable principles, will always support the constitution, good morals, and the happiness of all.

Consequently, the sex that is as superior in beauty as it is in courage during the sufferings of maternity recognizes and declares in the presence and under the auspices of the Supreme Being, the following Rights of Women and of Female citizens.

Article I

Woman is born free and lives equal to man in her rights. Social distinctions can be based only on the common utility.

Article II

The purpose of any political association is the conservation of the natural and imprescriptible rights of woman and man; these rights are liberty, property, security, and especially resistance to oppression.

Article III

The principle of all sovereignty rests essentially with the nation, which is nothing but the union of woman and man; no body and no individual can exercise any authority which does not come expressly from it [the nation].

Article IV

Liberty and justice consist of restoring all that belongs to others; thus, the only limits on the exercise of the natural rights of woman are perpetual male tyranny; these limits are to be reformed by the laws of nature and reason.

Article V

Laws of nature and reason proscribe all acts harmful to society; everything which is not prohibited by these wise and divine laws cannot be prevented, and no one can be constrained to do what they do not command.

Article VI

The law must be the expression of the general will; all female and male citizens must contribute either personally or through their representatives to its formation; it must be the same for all: male and female citizens, being equal in the eyes of the law, must be equally admitted to all honors, positions, and public employment according to their capacity and without other distinctions besides those of their virtues and talents.

Article VII

No woman is an exception; she is accused, arrested, and detained in cases determined by law. Women, like men, obey this rigorous law.

Article VIII

The law must establish only those penalties that are strictly and obviously necessary, and no one can be punished except by virtue of a law established and promulgated prior to the crime and legally applicable to women.

Article IX

Once any woman is declared guilty, complete rigor is [to be] exercised by the law.

Article X

No one is to be disquieted for his very basic opinions; woman has the right to mount the scaffold; she must equally have the right to mount the rostrum, provided that her demonstrations do not disturb the legally established public order.

Article XI

The free communication of thoughts and opinions is one of the most precious rights of woman, since that liberty assures the recognition of children by their fathers. Any female citizen thus may say freely, I am the mother of a child which belongs to you, without being forced by a barbarous prejudice to hide the truth; [an exception may be made] to respond to the abuse of this liberty in cases determined by the law.

Article XII

The guarantee of the rights of woman and the female citizen implies a major benefit; this guarantee must be instituted for the advantage of all, and not for the particular benefit of those to whom it is entrusted.

Article XIII

For the support of the public force and the expenses of administration, the contributions of woman and man are equal; she shares all the duties [corvées] and all the painful tasks; therefore, she must have the same share in the distribution of positions, employment, offices, honors, and jobs [industrie].

Article XIV

Female and male citizens have the right to verify, either by themselves or through their representatives, the necessity of the public contribution. This can only apply to women if they are granted an equal share, not only of wealth, but also of public administration, and in the determination of the proportion, the base, the collection, and the duration of the tax.

Article XV

The collectivity of women, joined for tax purposes to the aggregate of men, has the right to demand an accounting of his administration from any public agent.

Article XVI

No society has a constitution without the guarantee of rights and the separation of powers; the constitution is null if the majority of individuals comprising the nation have not cooperated in drafting it.

Article XVII

Property belongs to both sexes whether united or separate; for each it is an inviolable and sacred right; no one can be deprived of it, since it is the true patrimony of nature, unless the legally determined public need obviously dictates it, and then only with a just and prior indemnity.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

  1. Why does de Gouges label men as a “despot sex”? In doing so, how does she cast a light on the limitations of the National Assembly’s revolutionary agenda?

    Question

    rC/3ZCjQzuVBEBMoeDu3Z355YgnioZ6BmsbctjOcmra2niMGL6NCbytkcNvRhjq2HPXzfUauImiNisq5feUEZmy2MEVO4ue8SgafdT+BI/ZjRUpD87DGBwNuSr3crUSiitt66H6nu071pbS1oi+1bgMKTo+Gyx64GoN+hRE2trIqARYJIQachhcGUd7jpQaLQm0USu6+12bRb41gzRUHvBRUN735VSuImViptuJVbEyp7x3K6CKTF6oampsehPwQpeZD37nmUBZNf6AB
    Why does de Gouges label men as a “despot sex”? In doing so, how does she cast a light on the limitations of the National Assembly’s revolutionary agenda?
  2. De Gouges passionately argues that women and men should have the same inalienable and sacred rights as guaranteed by law. What rights for women does she delineate specifically in her declaration, and why?

    Question

    CkT3oeeVwTg0DI2+XzxMr2oRbOs4hczkvBmVWoOWYR3pFa1ObtNEEZ5yFUqwvTFu6qv0eXvwNf5cOAqmFQLGY3PyXedAN/k1E0fVwmj6hxgRPyX5qj3T6UX5uOrXQtaiZ5ao3RBihwRi1SKi3ACY5RhqncZQ56xKKDURaS4qTl4ig7ekFd9dATDbr8Kb8IhRaFKQGJubc68BflVb5OGCjER1FQPbQ2r785MNXjZFNnpvk+ewBXMjtGXJAgUn//MBxVOl/GT2MOSexXIbI5V6WfrA7SM0pjNaep7rIgvVQ0QKPnySynfdcrBXX2m9HLS8Qn9x0Iji0Yw=
    De Gouges passionately argues that women and men should have the same inalienable and sacred rights as guaranteed by law. What rights for women does she delineate specifically in her declaration, and why?
  3. Why does de Gouges think these rights are not simply in the best interest of women but of society in general?

    Question

    gIP7aV4bB1eZQbIhoCCDrYF+i4h8IsOoNQuh6V57jHVA53NSXrPpqKzkdN4s8vlGaOh4u+Vmj1XDkEEvnt1iTa0JR3C7LKIQzDnngSAJlvOOcdlslrif9pqjgc4Z6rsKzNy7l4fEQComM1tCITvVXaZVsxbpqRtpf8tZ77MsHwKK4ZRzlun9Kf+rnvXe+i/5SkebWyxgSEg=
    Why does de Gouges think these rights are not simply in the best interest of women but of society in general?