Chapter 26. The Finite Age of the Universe

26.1 Introduction

AstroTutorials
true
To advance to the next page of the tutorial you need to submit every question; currently you have not finished all the questions on this page. Leaving a tutorial page without submitting all the questions results in you receiving no grade in the gradebook.
true
COBE satellite

Author: Scott Miller, Pennsylvania State University

Editor: Grace L. Deming, University of Maryland

COBE Satellite
The COBE satellite first measure the spectrum of cosmic microwave background radiation, an indicator that we live in a universe of finite age.

The goals of this module: After completing this exercise, you should be able to:

  1. Explain Olbers' paradox.
  2. Explain the significance of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation.
  3. List the observational evidence that astronomers have that supports a finite age for the universe.

In this module you will explore:

  1. Why the night time sky is dark.
  2. How we know that the age of the universe is finite.
  3. What astronomers mean by the lookback time of an object.

Why you are doing it: Today almost all astronomers believe that the universe had a definite beginning with the Big Bang, but that wasn't always the case. At one point some astronomers believed that the universe was infinite in size and age; that it has always existed. In this activity we will explore the evidence which supports a finite age for the universe.

26.2 Background

COBE Satellite
Astronomers have measured the ages of a number of celestial objects and found an upper limit to their ages, suggesting a finite age for the universe.

Astronomers have determined a number of methods for measuring the ages of objects within our universe. Within our Solar System, we can use radioactive dating to determine the ages of rocks from various bodies, such as the Earth, the Moon, Mars and meteorites. Along with numerical modeling of our Sun, we have determined an age for our Solar System of approximately 4.6 billion years.

As we move outward into our Galaxy, we can determine the ages of stars within young open clusters, such as those shown in the figure above. By studying the HR diagram of a cluster of stars, we can determine when the stars within the cluster formed. When we do this, we find that these systems tend to be younger than 7 - 9 billion years old. We don't find young open clusters older than this. When looking at globular clusters in the halo of our Galaxy, we find that these stars are older, around 11 billion years old or so.

If we use Hubble's law to approximate the age of the universe, tracing back history to a time when all objects were together in one point, we get an age of 13.7 billions years. No matter what celestial objects we determine ages for, we find that there seems to be a limit to how old objects in our universe are. We never find objects older than 13.7 billion years. The fact that there are no objects older than this age suggests that the universe has not been around forever, but has a finite age. There are other ways that astronomers know that the universe has a finite age.

26.3 Why is the Night Sky Dark?

Rotation of the Earth Animation

Question Sequence

Question 26.1

Let's assume for a moment that we live in an infinite universe with galaxies uniformly distributed throughout, such that from Earth, we would see galaxies in every direction, as shown in the figure above.

Click on the circle which surrounds the Earth. Drag the circle outward to see how the number of galaxies observed from Earth varies with distance.

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
3
Try again. Move the circle surrounding the Earth several times, and compare how the number of galaxies changes at varying distances.
Correct. As we look out in all directions around the Earth, the number of galaxies at a particular distance increases with the square of the distance.
Incorrect. As we look out in all directions around the Earth, the number of galaxies at a particular distance increases with the square of the distance.

Question 26.2

Now, let's assume that all galaxies give off roughly the same amount of light.

Hover your mouse over various galaxies in the animation above to see how their apparent brightnesses compare.

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
3
Try again. Hover over a number of galaxies at specific distances from the Earth and see how their apparent brightnesses compare. Also, you may want to review the Inverse Square Law of Light.
Correct. According to the Inverse Square Law of Light, the brightness of an object decreases with the square of the distance between the object and the observer.
Incorrect. According to the Inverse Square Law of Light, the brightness of an object decreases with the square of the distance between the object and the observer.

Summary

While galaxies may appear dimmer at farther and farther distances, there are more of them giving off light. While the apparent brightness of the galaxies decreases as the inverse of the square of the distance, the number of galaxies increases as the square of the distance, and the two factors cancel out. That means that the combined light of distant galaxies is as bright as the closest objects in the sky. If this is the case, then the night time sky should be as bright as the daytime sky. Why isn't it?

26.4 Olbers' Paradox

Night sky
When we look at the sky at night it is dark.

Obviously when we look at the sky at night it is dark, yet according to the scenario on the previous page, it shouldn't be. How do we explain this apparent paradox? The solution is simple and was first put forth by the astronomer Heinrich Olbers. We assumed that galaxies were distributed uniformly throughout an infinite universe. This assumption is incorrect. The universe, as we can observe it, is not infinite, but rather is finite in size. If that is the case, then the total amount of light we receive from all of the galaxies we can observe is finite as well, and not enough to illuminate the night time sky.

Why is the universe as we can observe it finite? It is because the speed of light is finite (incredibly fast, but finite). Traveling at a speed of 300,000 kilometers per second, light seems to travel instantaneously from a light bulb to your eyes when you turn on a switch, but over very long distances, it takes light time to travel. Light from the Sun, at a distance of 150,000,000 km away from the Earth, takes a little over 8 minutes to reach us. Light from objects even farther away takes even longer. When we look at objects in space, we are seeing the light which has left them some time ago in the past. We are actually observing the objects as they appeared in the past. How far back in time we are looking when observing an object is known as the lookback time. The farther away an object lies, the larger its lookback time.

Question 26.3

dIjDqa4Sm+DMZQlgqIz5GGtUq8ro+ORb0GhQGoAcZlb+5H/RNhYAwVF0vtbl0+ltmLm9+JlgfHCZc9bwBAcRxbPNqkJFTVjLUsfMYU5KQgWoHCfy16e0/fY09CycGN1Bfa/u+UL9wOhb7NaVECCytnQXkTlgwKup3LgfOGfhcNH9U6trb4uRdokfjO4+6xEJrxQv8MRozDVDdapYz+N7nWyc05/iDcwftv7gtzAUl61S7Jnjm28nXFIEM3qkE8HJ5lD2NqtZQ17wJVNKmPzp27Ws0ezbj/t7R5MHZinU4AxWb21tV0yoJ1D9k9WwmtaiiS6kMffmEHi+0/yjVe9q+EtNZyNHn0ZPwt7Ce7K3mv33riOr
3
Try again. Remember that we observed the star as it appeared in the past, 25,000 years ago.
Correct. While we determined that the star has 15,000 years left before it explodes, since it is 25,000 light years away, we are seeing it as it appeared 25,000 years ago. Because of this, we can determine that the star exploded 10,000 years ago; we just haven't seen the explosion yet.
Incorrect. While we determined that the star has 15,000 years left before it explodes, since it is 25,000 light years away, we are seeing it as it appeared 25,000 years ago. Because of this, we can determine that the star exploded 10,000 years ago; we just haven't seen the explosion yet.

Summary

The fact that we are only receiving light from objects out to a certain distance (as determined by Olbers' paradox) indicates that light has only been traveling through our universe for a finite period of time. If the universe were infinitely old, then we would be receiving light from infinitely far away, but we're not. This suggests that we must live in a finite observable universe with a finite age.

You should note that this says nothing about the size of the universe as a whole, only the universe which we can observe. Olbers' paradox does not prohibit the existence of an infinite universe, it only states that we are only receiving light from (and therefore observing) a finite portion of it. Light from the rest of the universe may still be traveling towards us and just hasn't reached us yet. It could be that we live in a universe which is infinite in size but finite in age.

26.5 Observational Evidence of the Beginning of the Universe

The spectrum of the cosmic microwave background
The spectrum of the cosmic microwave background.

Other than Olbers' paradox, what evidence do we have of this finite observable universe?

In the early 1960's, two scientists, Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, were working on a radio antenna designed for communication purposes. As they were testing it, they were confused by the presence of a background signal no matter where they pointed their antenna. After carefully removing any possible source that could be causing the background noise, Penzias and Wilson still detected this background signal. Fortunately, at around the same time, physicists Robert Dicke and P. J. E. Peebles predicted the existence of such a background signal, and Penzias and Wilson discovered that what they were detecting was not just random noise but actually the remnant radiation from the beginning of the universe itself.

What Penzias and Wilson discovered has become known as the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Radiation. Launched in 1989, astronomers used the COBE satellite to measure the CMB over a range of wavelengths, and determined that this radiation obeys blackbody radiation laws, peaking at a wavelength of 1.06 mm, as shown in the figure.

Question 26.4

gQyHWTfE85+qfjyOmFSEhYl+a5fPrCROf2soq9IRJYxewDyJKn3tyWeg/T8P+DNf4IRqCJTKzBpyHPRZ2hX1EkmJbeSnCrjHqvNJgHscInrGHQ3Xy/QRgYOdwcvjiFfN2LJUtbj5dDet90bybTSrnmQ4kAcdDHH9FK9htGsXN0b1A+c1QZCsj1dNsY7frrPRl0j5vvrwEbmsaIat1sJp+rJvHq3YKTIoSrRLLMN73KwSXqOpTl5HtrK5P1bw7s6DOeB4jgxfXOnwBBXaswhKXRd2bi4HYcQUm38NTw==
3
Try again. You should convert the wavelength from mm to m. There are 1000 mm in 1 m. In order to solve for T, you need to divide the constant (0.0029) by the wavelength.
Correct. An object which emits most of its light at 1.06 mm has a temperature of only 2.7 K.
Incorrect. An object which emits most of its light at 1.06 mm has a temperature of only 2.7 K.

This near constant temperature detected in all directions is considered the remains from the tremendous release of energy from the Big Bang itself.

Question 26.5

YAOeDv8LgfPsj7f4SzOBLZ/SzFXUq0uMTavvmQvgDeMIlBWebbjLSloMIM2vOZxvk04UC+OFqQAmE5Fn2X6KFs+zcrTAkuVG+rcZ8RR1mo832PHBxZdQQ27knEj9Y1rvC9P4I/XOwqyBSv+pD1f///994eCL1yk9Q5kPhcgzOrnLjdB7aBQWaoCKFvcSw8fd3Nwiuy/X05O9ofOh5iD09b265RFCn9xsP7Adg3qpwiqVANMCWtN8dpBlWSL/rOd+e4t7h2wSzlSdS4Xnq+AFnKtriNQ3Bcjl/5rJP/iGZN1CoxW2CoW3efrKSlD6/oiwnBY15icY3pyHD8wxlMaNgCLsYH6pHdZiNuPF55eAQoQXdxCk
3
Try again. Look at the formula above. How is the peak wavelength related to the temperature of the blackbody object?
Correct. The peak wavelength is inversely proportional to the temperature of the blackbody object. As one increases, the other decreases.
Incorrect. The peak wavelength is inversely proportional to the temperature of the blackbody object. As one increases, the other decreases.

26.6 So What is the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation?

To understand what we are observing when we look at the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, we need to go back to the very formation of the universe itself. When the universe began, 13.7 billion years ago, a tremendous amount of energy was created and formed what came to be our universe. As this energy expanded in all directions, matter existed in the form of elementary particles (electrons, protons, etc.). At this point, any photons traveling through the universe were quickly absorbed and scattered by free electrons, making it difficult for photons to freely travel. We say that the universe at this point was opaque. As time went on, the universe continued to expand, and as it did so it cooled off.

To see how the photons moved in the early universe, click on the start button.

Roughly 380,000 years after the Big Bang, the universe cooled to a temperature of 3,000 Kelvin. At this point, temperatures were low enough that elementary particles could combine to form atoms. When this occurred, photons were then free to move through the universe, and the universe became transparent. Photons moving around at this time had a distribution of wavelengths as determined by blackbody laws, and peaked at a wavelength of around 1 μm. As the photons continued to move through the universe, the cosmological redshift shifted their wavelengths to longer and longer wavelengths, causing their corresponding blackbody temperature to drop. As we observe the photons today, we are measuring a blackbody temperature of only 2.7 K because of this.

To see how the photons moved after the first atoms formed, click on the Continue button. What we are observing, therefore, when we detect the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, are the photons that became free to move at this period of transition between the opaque universe and the transparent universe, as depicted in the animation above. Because of the lookback time of objects at far distances, if light was not free to move through the universe before a certain time in the history of our universe, then we cannot see to a time before this either. This defines the extent of the finite observable universe in which we live. We will never be able to observe a time earlier than this.

26.7 Quick Check Quiz

Indepth Activity: The Finite Age of the Universe

Question 26.6

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
Correct. Olbers' paradox suggests that the universe is finite in age, and that the observable universe is finite in size, but places no restrictions on the universe as a whole.
Incorrect. Olbers' paradox suggests that the universe is finite in age, and that the observable universe is finite in size, but places no restrictions on the universe as a whole.

Question 26.7

0Be1S8M5JKiC9LOZISQLCCTPU6lyZV9xq28J6Uuxt1mHOAnZhH62m7o4+Myoj0ZJDI53C2CyQyLBeZgqT54mpfwEk/4qgLezy3LMbNpYlbL3F/1F5b27D7SZ3iQUDw0C7febIomj9HKJi8TtN/MtF1ARPfi/QyQYMTXPlTuSkSsfEMZXdjKvbdDvFmBfLpE+CPAcv0W1Xst0WCB0YLJ0X0kPGXfb6woSaowOUaE4Rsf39kRTuGInsBCYft/E0zxonQ8j63u62bjClOYZD3Kz+JtaDYpkQDr8pvoRxyuSVA1TXuHRULfD1x26Vf4LV3T2biF9AXZurpWtej5VxvNWT++9d/j9CN4hf8qf98VX5nLnQXu1w6Cv78PKMDgJz3RryD9Anj7NBkBdS2CAtiuy3QkRyx37fWAz0nJmC+3DGXbvd6FWgTxx0pcZayxK2vi9Nkvv0t2oBj6PbuZJe6O6OXe3cUrT5ihHDVS+rQ==
Correct. The photons associated with the cosmic microwave background radiation are from the period of time when the universe changed from being opaque to being transparent, which occurred roughly 380,000 years after the Big Bang.
Incorrect. The photons associated with the cosmic microwave background radiation are from the period of time when the universe changed from being opaque to being transparent, which occurred roughly 380,000 years after the Big Bang.

Question 26.8

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
Correct. While galaxies may appear dimmer at farther and farther distances, there are more of them giving off light. That means that the combined light of distant galaxies is as bright as the closest objects in the sky. If this is the case, then the night time sky should be as bright as the daytime sky. Why isn't it?
Incorrect. While galaxies may appear dimmer at farther and farther distances, there are more of them giving off light. That means that the combined light of distant galaxies is as bright as the closest objects in the sky. If this is the case, then the night time sky should be as bright as the daytime sky. Why isn't it?

Question 26.9

jldQxeaRbBhuXf4CT6eV7PSISoLjDB3xR/UgqIt+M8B0GzAUPeHDLZuuBhX4eSOO5W06law5kfRDmhUkhHnCEU77jk5Tg2ZhuNRMY33QUHEZc4JjKzi218I/dQXPgsqO4i3wnaJpnJWbqUXB
Correct. In the early 1960s, two scientists, Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, were working on a radio antenna designed for communication purposes. What Penzias and Wilson discovered during their work has become known as the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Radiation.
Incorrect. In the early 1960s, two scientists, Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, were working on a radio antenna designed for communication purposes. What Penzias and Wilson discovered during their work has become known as the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Radiation.

Question 26.10

cuSUHbZGRpibT50POaYfYWAJn09rgH26Vg15ONaPyX4JYWe8Tx9i6fUemeWeHS+0hELGhC0Vz1BkpwW4AQXPIKLzT4EjSFFiRsv+e5EV33tD7+SLbqIUMKlTQ+6eZv1gjr9RNfe8QJ3Vx/XLJ4kNCnqAdwbwwD8qVzDy0s/BYESe6UCspGXdnAZBhlgyP6sHmHsYpqquy+cbYrlvo+hB2BJeTC8+Scy6+1V83yQZliQXBp++wST3FJc5piSWKPbMjo3pRKKa7nyYvq1j5W+F19T9EBEKstXSNJeBlkG7QANSLA4kgHDVQI+f8qs53ZCdli22P2kDbsFKFePDY7P1wN2g0zA=
Correct. Roughly 380,000 years after the Big Bang, the Universe cooled to a temperature of 3,000 Kelvin, and the Universe became transparent. Because of the lookback time of objects at far distances, if light was not free to move through the Universe before this, then we cannot see to a time before this either. We will never be able to observe a time earlier than this.
Incorrect. Roughly 380,000 years after the Big Bang, the Universe cooled to a temperature of 3,000 Kelvin, and the Universe became transparent. Because of the lookback time of objects at far distances, if light was not free to move through the Universe before this, then we cannot see to a time before this either. We will never be able to observe a time earlier than this.

Question 26.11

xOQZeEtBe6sHLOCBb0eaMYgxtPHdmYudsnb2rcUfx/HR50hjuZjqGzgIKKJbdtuG8dN9vYHtJvRCbHBwZYvNWH0Hk8rOV1gw43a79IPTGd2FKgUWqfq+UDPDr/BOOnQu4RTID0ndnmNQs1o63+hJ4oNGSwlKUmm/+TnQYiOAFLS/PGdoTkyIKqg8PN+pN4AuAkngyi3o6IMN7AuVSgCP+RKn3/7nV/ZFPSx4WOEA0KfWIKYoJ8vZCnjMiasehnSZxVRQQnnW0onMAW1bbw6j8QKOIBs9QLgSkCC+Xpyii/QTR8JNKLGgQ+EZSknpP6MnfpdqzBwf138mnPwmwdYzAHTAdI1QmvLmNO82JEaRD9Ts1594KqWw8CKlTvP4wETIcG25QytOoDoWtgFPMgLysg==
Correct. The paradox assumes that galaxies were distributed uniformly throughout an infinite Universe. This assumption is incorrect. The Universe, as we can observe it, is not infinite but rather is finite in size. Why is the Universe as we can observe it finite? It is because the speed of light is finite (incredibly fast, but finite).
Incorrect. The paradox assumes that galaxies were distributed uniformly throughout an infinite Universe. This assumption is incorrect. The Universe, as we can observe it, is not infinite but rather is finite in size. Why is the Universe as we can observe it finite? It is because the speed of light is finite (incredibly fast, but finite).

Question 26.12

ehY3X/mkvFv8dPocUyFjJQGVmik4v0O1HO028J8nxmIL2OHb76CssMNfn8M2v9Hq5N9uNpCvmH/dK86kkb/74OJIEYl6Z3cKRqxGEJ2bBgCuaizfUdYsWKH1Eh9M7TrLPs2NpGZbDRF7AZgTvMkYLldDQnZTRId6SkFTZ+35sZ8QIWUL
Correct. Launched in 1989, astronomers used the COBE satellite to measure the CMB over a range of wavelengths, and determined that this radiation obeys blackbody radiation laws, peaking at a wavelength of 1.06 mm corresponding to 2.725 K.
Incorrect. Launched in 1989, astronomers used the COBE satellite to measure the CMB over a range of wavelengths, and determined that this radiation obeys blackbody radiation laws, peaking at a wavelength of 1.06 mm corresponding to 2.725 K.

Question 26.13

+xcKOnsbh2yZaTkklOV7TX9RjREL/hMgKDC9WGpn5YYhBWOIPuURlGdezOuZHleTbYWdXohh9moKsbalLm2dQTZN0jFLiozYeYlEFUy/oHTXjB0o6XdXuPqeV8As+f4S3qCs+StSBVNk0u1Fj3mFZhKCCLhYs4yrsmYwyjNLU28W1Dt4si+Q7bWYUkupQIs8G+Fbvek+fVoC89ainJHfgl6R0VUjh7j51RJzl/RQNGBqnB2khnWWxNMJcNikYiYhO5asZKEL+dOxTbyZvIIn5WIfxGskBKGiDPJofJxegFkAeqrlY5Ul3gDc1YvVzA8fNGAbblkytIzFL0LOqck8U8ZcVibTC5YfMW/rKEZFJWWpp/qksoSoQM25eLXgRiqFS7KPtoCdyT5ifp/oLN43RAQOmAM+z4mSs2Erxw314ayXQtRkvZqo6DY0KMhpUr+2m7xmbDcJwQLQ+H7EfaRzustOhsghiyH7ClWNn/FMFlr+9bBM
Correct. According to Wien's law, the peak wavelength of emission from a blackbody is inversely related to its temperature. Therefore, as the wavelength increases due to the redshift, the associated temperature will decrease.
Incorrect. According to Wien's law, the peak wavelength of emission from a blackbody is inversely related to its temperature. Therefore, as the wavelength increases due to the redshift, the associated temperature will decrease.

Question 26.14

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
Correct. Because of the lookback time, we are seeing the star as it appeared 20 million years ago. 20 million years ago, the star was still around, but with only 10 million more years left until it explodes.
Incorrect. Because of the lookback time, we are seeing the star as it appeared 20 million years ago. 20 million years ago, the star was still around, but with only 10 million more years left until it explodes.

Question 26.15

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
Correct. During the early universe, photons were not free to travel because they kept getting absorbed and scattered by free electrons. This only stopped when the universe cooled enough that the electrons could combine with protons to form atoms, which did not absorb and scatter the photons.
Incorrect. During the early universe, photons were not free to travel because they kept getting absorbed and scattered by free electrons. This only stopped when the universe cooled enough that the electrons could combine with protons to form atoms, which did not absorb and scatter the photons.