Another way to interpret Equation 28-7 is to say that it places limits on how precisely the law of conservation of energy must be obeyed. Suppose a system undergoes some kind of process that lasts for a time \(\Delta{t}\). Equation 28-7 says that the energy of the system is necessarily uncertain during that process, and the minimum energy uncertainty is given by \(\Delta{E} \Delta{t} = \hbar / 2\) or \(\Delta{E} = \hbar / (2 \Delta{t})\). So it’s fundamentally impossible to measure the energy of the system with an uncertainty less than \(\hbar / (2 \Delta{t})\). This means that during the process, the energy of the system could actually vary by as much as \(\hbar / (2 \Delta{t})\), and there would be no way that we could tell that the energy had changed value—that is, that the energy was not conserved. The shorter the duration \(\Delta{t}\) of the process, the greater the amount \(\hbar / (2 \Delta{t})\)by which energy conservation can be (temporarily) violated during that time \(\Delta{t}\). Stated another way, it’s acceptable to violate the law of conservation of energy by an amount \(\Delta{E}\), provided the duration of time during which the law is violated is no more than \(\Delta{t} = \hbar / (2 \Delta{E})\).