17.4 Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder

Most children break rules or misbehave on occasion. If they consistently display extreme hostility and defiance, however, they may qualify for a diagnosis of oppositional defiant disorder or conduct disorder. Those with oppositional defiant disorder are argumentative and defiant, angry, and irritable, and in some cases, vindictive (APA, 2013). They may argue repeatedly with adults, ignore adult rules and requests, deliberately annoy other people, and feel much anger and resentment. As many as 10 percent of children qualify for a diagnosis of oppositional defiant disorder (Mash & Wolfe, 2012; Merikangas et al., 2010). The disorder is more common in boys than in girls before puberty but equal in both sexes after puberty.

oppositional defiant disorder A childhood disorder in which children are repeatedly argumentative and defiant, angry and irritable, and in some cases, vindictive.

Children with conduct disorder, a more severe problem, repeatedly violate the basic rights of others (APA, 2013). They are often aggressive and may be physically cruel to people or animals, deliberately destroy other people’s property, steal or lie, skip school, or run away from home (see Table 17-3). Many threaten or harm their victims, committing such crimes as firesetting, shoplifting, forgery, breaking into buildings or cars, mugging, and armed robbery. As they get older, their acts of physical violence may include rape or, in rare cases, homicide. The symptoms of conduct disorder are apparent in this summary of a clinical interview with a 15-year-old boy named Derek:

BETWEEN THE LINES

Underlying Problems

There are approximately 110,000 teenagers in the United States incarcerated each year. Three-quarters of them report mental health problems.

(Nordal, 2010)

conduct disorder A childhood disorder in which the child repeatedly violates the basic rights of others and displays aggression, characterized by symptoms such as physical cruelty to people or animals, the deliberate destruction of other people’s property, and the commission of various crimes.

Questioning revealed that Derek was getting into … serious trouble of late, having been arrested for shoplifting 4 weeks before. Derek was caught with one other youth when he and a dozen friends swarmed a convenience store and took everything they could before leaving in cars. This event followed similar others at [an electronics] store and a … clothing store. Derek blamed his friends for his arrest because they apparently left him behind as he straggled out of the store. He was charged only with shoplifting, however, after police found him holding just three candy bars and a bag of potato chips. Derek expressed no remorse for the theft or any care for the store clerk who was injured when one of the teens pushed her into a glass case. When informed of the clerk’s injury, for example, Derek replied, “I didn’t do it, so what do I care?”

The psychologist questioned Derek further about other legal violations and discovered a rather extended history of trouble. Derek was arrested for vandalism 10 months earlier for breaking windows and damaging cars on school property. He received probation for 6 months because this was his first offense. Derek also boasted of other exploits for which he was not caught, including several shoplifting episodes, … joyriding, and missing school. Derek missed 23 days (50 percent) of school since the beginning of the academic year. In addition, he described break-in attempts of his neighbors’ apartments…. Only rarely during the interview did Derek stray from his bravado.

(Kearney, 2013, pp. 87–88)

Table : table: 17-3Dx Checklist

Conduct Disorder

1.

Individual repeatedly behaves in ways that violate the rights of other people or ignore the norms or rules society, beyond the violations displayed by most other people of his or her age.

2.

At least three of the following features are present over the past year (and at least one in the past 6 months): • Frequent bullying or threatening of others • Frequent provoking of physical fights • Using dangerous weapons • Physical cruelty to people • Physical cruelty to animals • Stealing during confrontations with a victim • Forcing someone into sexual activity • Fire-setting • Deliberately destroying others’ property. • Breaking into a house, building, or car • Frequent lying • Stealing items of value under nonconfrontational circumstances • Frequent staying out beyond curfews, starting before the age of 13 • Running away from home overnight at least twice • Frequent truancy from school, starting before the age of 13.

3.

Significant impairment.

(Information from: APA, 2013)

Conduct disorder usually begins between 7 and 15 years of age (APA, 2013). As many as 10 percent of children, three-quarters of them boys, qualify for this diagnosis (Mash & Wolfe, 2012; Hibbs & Jensen, 2005). Children with a relatively mild conduct disorder often improve over time, but a severe case may continue into adulthood and develop into antisocial personality disorder or other psychological problems (Mash & Wolfe, 2012). Usually, the earlier the onset of the conduct disorder, the poorer the eventual outcome. Research indicates that more than 80 percent of those who develop conduct disorder first display a pattern of oppositional defiant disorder (APA, 2013; Lahey, 2008). More than one-third of children with conduct disorder also display attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a disorder that you will read about shortly (Jiron, 2010). And a number of children with the disorder also experience depression and anxiety.

575

Some clinical theorists believe that there are actually several kinds of conduct disorder, including (1) the overt-destructive pattern, in which individuals display openly aggressive and confrontational behaviors; (2) the overt-nondestructive pattern, dominated by openly offensive but nonconfrontational behaviors such as lying; (3) the covert-destructive pattern, characterized by secretive destructive behaviors such as violating other people’s property, breaking and entering, and setting fires; and (4) the covert-nondestructive pattern, in which individuals secretly commit nonaggressive behaviors, such as being truant from school (McMahon et al., 2010; McMahon & Frick, 2007, 2005). It may be that the different patterns have different causes. In a similar vein, DSM-5 instructs diagnosticians to distinguish those individuals whose conduct disorder is marked by particularly callous and unemotional behaviors, as they may be qualitatively different from others with the disorder (APA, 2013).

Other researchers distinguish yet another pattern of aggression found in certain cases of conduct disorder, relational aggression, in which the individual is socially isolated and primarily engages in social misdeeds such as slandering others, spreading rumors, and manipulating friendships (Ostrov et al., 2014; Keenan et al., 2010) (see MediaSpeak below). Relational aggression is more common among girls than boys.

Many children with conduct disorder are suspended from school, placed in foster homes, or incarcerated (Weyandt et al., 2011). When children between the ages of 8 and 18 break the law, the legal system often labels them juvenile delinquents (Wiklund et al., 2014; Jiron, 2010). More than half of the juveniles who are arrested each year are recidivists, meaning they have a history of having been arrested. Boys are much more involved in juvenile crime than girls, although the gap between them is narrowing. Girls are most likely to be arrested for drug use, sexual offenses, and running away, boys for drug use and crimes against property. After steadily rising during the 1990s, the number of arrests of teenagers for serious crimes has fallen by one-third during the past decade (U.S. Department of Justice, 2014, 2010).

Antisocial behavior and the law Many children and adolescents with conduct disorder wind up incarcerated in juvenile detention, or juvenile training, centers when their antisocial behaviors place them in conflict with the law. Here inmates at a juvenile detention center in Alabama spend Christmas waiting in line to go outside for physical training.

576

MediaSpeak

Targeted for Bullying

By Jesse McKinley, The New York Times, October 4, 2010

When Seth Walsh was in the sixth grade, he turned to his mother one day and told her he had something to say. “I was folding clothes, and he said, ‘Mom, I’m gay,’” said Wendy Walsh, a hairstylist and single mother of four. “I said, ‘O.K., sweetheart, I love you no matter what.’"

But last month, Seth went into the backyard of his home in the desert town of Tehachapi, Calif., and hanged himself, apparently unable to bear a relentless barrage of taunting, bullying and other abuse at the hands of his peers. After a little more than a week on life support, he died last Tuesday. He was 13.

Important message Actor Chris Colfer won a Golden Globe Award in 2011 for his portrayal of bullied gay teen Kurt Hummel in the popular television series Glee. In his acceptance speech, Colfer, who is himself openly gay, said, “To all those amazing kids … who are constantly told … by bullies at school that they can’t be who they are…. Well, screw that, kids.”

The case of Tyler Clementi, the Rutgers University freshman who jumped off the George Washington Bridge after a sexual encounter with another man was broadcast online, has shocked many. But his death is just one of several suicides in recent weeks by young gay teenagers who had been harassed by classmates, both in person and online.

The list includes Billy Lucas, a 15-year-old from Greensburg, Ind., who hanged himself on Sept. 9 after what classmates reportedly called a constant stream of invective against him at school.

Less than two weeks later, Asher Brown, a 13-year-old from the Houston suburbs, shot himself after coming out. He, too, had reported being taunted at his middle school, according to The Houston Chronicle. His family has blamed school officials as failing to take action after they complained, something the school district has denied.

The deaths have set off an impassioned—and sometimes angry—response from gay activists and caught the attention of federal officials, including Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, who on Friday called the suicides “unnecessary tragedies” brought on by “the trauma of being bullied.”

“This is a moment where every one of us—parents, teachers, students, elected officials and all people of conscience—needs to stand up and speak out against intolerance in all its forms,” Mr. Duncan said….

According to a recent survey, … nearly 9 of 10 gay, lesbian, transgender or bisexual middle and high school students suffered physical or verbal harassment in 2009, ranging from taunts to outright beatings….

In a pair of blog postings last week, Dan Savage, a sex columnist based in Seattle, assigns the blame to negligent teachers and school administrators, bullying classmates and “hate groups that warp some young minds and torment others.” …

“There are accomplices out there,” he wrote Saturday….

In late September, Mr. Savage began a project on YouTube called “It Gets Better,” featuring gay adults talking about their experiences with harassment as adolescents….

Can you suggest approaches, in addition to “It Gets Better,” that might help reduce address the problem of bullying, particularly bullying of LGBT people?

In Tehachapi, in Kern County south of here, more than 500 mourners attended a memorial on Friday for Seth Walsh. One of those … a classmate and friend, said Seth had long known he was gay and had been teased for years. “But this year it got much worse,” Jamie said. “People would say, ‘You should kill yourself,’ ‘You should go away,’ ‘You’re gay, who cares about you?’” …

For her part, Ms. Walsh said she … did not want to cast blame, though she hoped his death would teach people “not to discriminate, not be prejudiced.”

“I truly hope,” she said, “that people understand that.”

October 4, 2010, “Several Recent Suicides Put Light on Pressures Facing Gay Teenagers” by Jesse McKinley. From The New York Times, 10/4/2010, © 2010 The New York Times. All rights reserved. Used by permission and protected by the copyright laws of the United States. The printing, copying, redistribution, or retransmission of this content without express written permission is prohibited.

577

What Are the Causes of Conduct Disorder?

BETWEEN THE LINES

Narrowing the Gender Gap

Today, one of every three teens arrested for violent crimes is female.

(Department of Justice, 2008; Scelfo, 2005)

Many cases of conduct disorder, particularly those marked by destructive behaviors, have been linked to genetic and biological factors (Kerekes et al., 2014; Wallace et al., 2014). In addition, a number of cases have been tied to drug abuse, poverty, traumatic events, and exposure to violent peers or community violence (Wymbs et al., 2014; Weyandt et al., 2011). Most often, however, conduct disorder has been tied to troubled parent–child relationships, inadequate parenting, family conflict, marital conflict, and family hostility (Henggeler & Sheidow, 2012; Mash & Wolfe, 2012). Children whose parents reject, leave, coerce, or abuse them or fail to provide appropriate and consistent supervision are apparently more likely to develop conduct problems. Children also seem more prone to this disorder when their parents themselves are antisocial, display excessive anger, or have substance use, mood, or schizophrenic disorders (Advokat et al., 2014).

How Do Clinicians Treat Conduct Disorder?

Because aggressive behaviors become more locked in with age, treatments for conduct disorder are generally most effective with children younger than 13 (APA, 2013; Webster-Stratton & Reid, 2010). A number of interventions, from sociocultural to child-focused, have been developed in recent years to treat children with the disorder. As you will see, several of these have had modest (and at times moderate) success, but clearly no one of them alone is the answer for this difficult problem. Today’s clinicians are increasingly combining several approaches into a wide-ranging treatment program.

Sociocultural TreatmentsGiven the importance of family factors in conduct disorder, therapists often use family interventions. One such approach, used with preschoolers, is called parent-child interaction therapy (Hembree-Kigin & McNeil, 2013; Zisser & Eyberg, 2010; Querido & Eyberg, 2005). Here therapists teach parents to work with their child positively, to set appropriate limits, to act consistently, to be fair in their discipline decisions, and to establish more appropriate expectations regarding the child. The therapists also try to teach the child better social skills. Ideally, these efforts strengthen the relationship between the parents and child, improve the parents’ attitudes, lead to more parent control, and help bring about improvements in the child’s behavior. A related family intervention for very young children, video modeling, works toward the same goals with the help of video tools (Webster-Stratton & Reid, 2010; Webster-Stratton, 2005).

When children reach school age, therapists often use a family intervention called parent management training. In this approach, (1) parents are again taught more effective ways to deal with their children, and (2) parents and children meet together in behavior-oriented family therapy (Kazdin, 2012, 2010, 2002; Forgatch & Patterson, 2010). Typically, the family and therapist target particular behaviors for change; then, with the help of written manuals, therapy rehearsals and practice, and homework, the parents are taught how to better identify problem behaviors, stop rewarding unwanted behaviors, and reward proper behaviors in a consistent manner. Like the family interventions for preschool-age children, parent management training has often achieved a measure of success (Kazdin, 2012; Forgatch & Patterson, 2010; McMahon & Kotler, 2008).

578

BETWEEN THE LINES

In Their Words

“Children nowadays are tyrants. They contradict their parents, gobble their food, and tyrannize their teachers.”

Socrates, 425 b.c.

Other sociocultural approaches, such as residential treatment in the community and programs at school, have also helped some children improve. In one such approach, treatment foster care, delinquent boys and girls with conduct disorder are assigned to a foster home in the community by the juvenile justice system (Henggeler & Sheidow, 2012). While there, the children, foster parents, and birth parents all receive training and treatment interventions, including family therapy with both sets of parents, individual treatment for the child, and meetings with the school and with parole and probation officers. In addition, the children and their parents continue to receive treatment and support after they leave foster care. This program is apparently most beneficial when all the intervention components are applied simultaneously.

In contrast to these sociocultural interventions, institutionalization in so-called juvenile training centers has not met with much success (Stahlberg et al., 2010; Heilbrun et al., 2005). In fact, such institutions frequently serve to strengthen delinquent behavior rather than resocialize young offenders.

How might juvenile training centers themselves contribute to the high recidivism rate among teenage criminal offenders?

Child-Focused TreatmentsTreatments that focus primarily on the child with conduct disorder, particularly cognitive-behavioral interventions, have had some success in recent years (Kazdin, 2012, 2010, 2007). In an approach called problem-solving skills training, therapists combine modeling, practice, role-playing, and systematic rewards to help teach children constructive thinking and positive social behaviors. During therapy sessions, the therapists may play games and solve tasks with the children, and later help the children apply the lessons and skills derived from the games and tasks to real-life situations.

In another child-focused approach, the Coping Power Program, children with conduct problems participate in group sessions that teach them to manage their anger more effectively, view situations in perspective, solve problems, become aware of their emotions, build social skills, set goals, and handle peer pressure. Studies indicate that child-focused approaches such as these do indeed help reduce aggressive behaviors and prevent substance use in adolescence (Lochman et al., 2011, 2010).

Recently, drug therapy has also been used for children with conduct disorder. Studies suggest that stimulant drugs may be helpful in reducing their aggressive behaviors at home and at school (Levy & Bloch, 2012; Connor et al., 2002).

Prevention: Scared Straight Rather than waiting for children or adolescents to develop antisocial patterns, many clinicians call for better prevention programs. In one such program, “at risk” children visit nearby prisons where inmates describe how drugs, gang life, and other antisocial behaviors led to their imprisonment.

PreventionIt may be that the best hope for dealing with the problem of conduct disorder lies in prevention programs that begin in the earliest stages of childhood (Hektner et al., 2014; Boxer & Frick, 2008). These programs try to change unfavorable social conditions before a conduct disorder is able to develop. The programs may offer training opportunities for young people, recreational facilities, and health care, and may try to ease the stresses of poverty and improve parents’ child-rearing skills. All such approaches work best when they educate and involve the family.

579