The Nature of Interviews
Although interviewing is not exactly like grabbing lunch with one of your friends, the same principles that apply to all forms of communication are also at work in an interview, with some important differences.
An interview is an interaction between two parties that is deliberate and purposeful for at least one of the parties involved. By nature, interviews are more structured and goal-driven than other forms of communication, and they are a form of discourse that is planned, dyadic, and interactive (O’Hair, Friedrich, & Dixon, 2007).
- Interviews are planned. Interviews have a purpose that goes beyond the establishment and development of a relationship. At least one of the parties has a predetermined reason for initiating the interview (for example, to gather information).
- Interviews are goal-driven. Because a goal exists in advance of the interaction, at least one of the participants plans a strategy for initiating, conducting, and concluding the interview.
- Interviews are structured. The primary goal of an interview is almost always defined at the beginning of the meeting, something that’s rarely true of a conversation with a friend. Interview relationships are more formally structured, and clear status differences often exist. One party usually expects to exert more control than the other.
- Interviews are dyadic. Like other forms of interpersonal communication, the interview is dyadic, meaning that it involves two parties. In some instances, a “party” consists of more than one person, as when survey researchers conduct group interviews or when job applicants appear before a panel of interviewers. In such situations, even though a number of individuals are involved, there are only two parties (interviewers and interviewees), each with a role to play.
- Interviews are interactive. Interviews involve two-way interactions in which both parties take turns in speaking and listening roles, with a heavy dependence on questions and answers. Although most interviews occur face to face, interactions over the phone or via a videoconference are also considered interactive discourse.
Think back to jon Stewart and company. The correspondents’ interviews are not only dyadic and interactive but also highly planned. They write questions ahead of time, based on the interviewee’s views and background, and they structure their interviews in a way that helps Stewart and company achieve their goal: a hilarious spoof on key topics.
All interviews, whether a question-and-answer session with E! on the red carpet or a serious job interview, are goal-driven, as well as dyadic and interactive in nature.
bedfordstmartins.com/commandyou