7.4 Starting Anew: Ecological Disturbance and Succession

Discuss the role of ecological disturbance and the return of life following disturbance.

We tend to think that balance and equilibrium exist in nature. More often, ecosystems are in a constant state of disequilibrium and change as they adjust to ecological disturbances through the process of ecological succession. An ecological disturbance is a sudden event that disrupts an ecosystem. Ecological succession is the step-by-step series of changes in an ecosystem that follows an ecological disturbance.

ecological disturbance

A sudden event that disrupts an ecosystem.

ecological succession

The step-by-step series of changes in an ecosystem that follows a disturbance.

Ecological Disturbance

Ecological disturbances can range from local fires that burn vegetation to massive volcanic eruptions that create an extensive barren landscape. Both biotic (living) forces and abiotic (nonliving) forces can create ecological disturbances. The removal of wolves from Yellowstone by people (see Figure 7.14) was a biotic disturbance, as was the introduction of the non-native Nile perch into Lake Victoria (see Figure 7.1).

Table 7.2 gives some examples of different types and severities of ecological disturbances. In this section, we take a more detailed look at the role of one type of disturbance—fire—in the landscapes of western North America.

Table : TABLE 7.2 AT A GLANCE: Types of Ecological Disturbances

 

TYPE OF ECOLOGICAL DISTURBANCE

SEVERITY

ABIOTIC

Volcanic eruption

Moderate to severe

Wildfire

Moderate to severe

Wind

Moderate

Flooding

Moderate

Avalanche

Moderate

BIOTIC

Insect outbreak

Moderate to severe

Anthropogenic forces (such as logging or farming)

Moderate to severe

Introduction of non-native species

Moderate

Fire is a widespread, common, and important disturbance in most vegetated regions. In many ecosystems, fire is as important as water, light, or soil nutrients. Many plant communities are dependent on fire. Wherever there is enough precipitation for vegetation to grow and a dry and warm season, fire will occur. Before wildfires were suppressed by people, many North American ecosystems had natural fire-return intervals of less than 35 years (Figure 7.19A). Many plants have adaptations to survive and even thrive in fire (Figure 7.19B).

Figure 7.19

Fire frequency and plant adaptations. (A) Before wildfires were suppressed, many areas in North America had frequent fires. This map shows natural fire-return intervals for the United States. (B) Plants have many adaptations for surviving wildfires. Intense fires, however, can kill even the most fire-adapted plants and seeds in soil. (Photos from left to right: Steve Norman, US Forest Service;
© Paul Tomlins/Flower/age fotostock)

Fire suppression has a long history in North America. In the 1930s, to save property and trees with commercial value, the U.S. Forest Service began a “10:00 a.m.” fire policy. Its aim was to have any given wildfire contained by ten o’clock the morning after it was first reported. Before the policy of fire suppression, surface fires (fires that burn gently on the forest floor and kill few trees) were a common occurrence (Figure 7.20A). But these fires were extinguished by the Forest Service.

Figure 7.20

Fire intensity. (A) When fires are frequent, fuel loads remain low, and fires burn as gentle surface fires, such as this one in the Sequoia and Kings Canyon national parks in California. (B) The Waldo Canyon fire near Colorado Springs, Colorado, became an intense canopy fire that burned 74 km2 (29 mi2) in Pike National Forest in June 2012. As a result of a century of fire suppression in the area, it was the most destructive fire in Colorado history up to that time, forcing some 32,000 people out of their homes and destroying 346 homes.
(A. Eric Knapp, US Forest Service; B. © RJ Sangosti/The Denver Post via Getty Images)

240

Fire suppression led to a buildup of dead and living vegetation, and these high fuel loads resulted in catastrophic canopy fires that could be impossible to extinguish. A canopy fire (or crown fire) burns in the forest canopy (the uppermost layer of branches) and usually kills the trees (Figure 7.20B).

In the past few decades, the essential ecological role of fire has been increasingly recognized. In an attempt to address the problem of fuel buildup in western U.S. forests caused by a century of fire suppression, prescribed burns and mechanical thinning operations (in which vegetation is removed by manual cutting) are sometimes employed to reduce fuel loads.

Ecological Succession: The Return of Life

Given enough time, life returns following fire or any other disturbance (Figure 7.21). There are two types of ecological succession, depending on the severity of the disturbance. Primary succession occurs when life is completely removed from a landscape. Large volcanic eruptions and large landslides are examples of disturbances that can trigger primary succession. In most cases, however, some life survives the disturbance, and ecosystems rebuild through the process of secondary succession.

Figure 7.21

Disturbance and ecological succession. (A) In 1988, numerous fires burned 793,880 acres of Yellowstone National Park. This photo shows an area just after it was burned. (B) Twenty years later, lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) is returning to these burned areas.
(A. National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park; B. © Katie LaSalle-Lowery)

Ecological succession takes place in stages and may require decades or centuries to complete. A sere is a stage of ecological succession that follows a disturbance. A typical sequence of seres that would occur in the eastern United States is illustrated in Figure 7.22. The return of the former ecosystem can take years to centuries, depending on the severity of the disturbance and the responsiveness of the ecosystem. In the past, scientists used the climax community model, which assumed that a community would persist indefinitely in the absence of any further disturbance. In the example in Figure 7.22, the oak-hickory forest would be the climax community.

Figure 7.22

A model of ecological succession. The return of life following ecological disturbance follows a sequence of seres. Given enough time, on the order of centuries, after the initial disturbance (left), bare ground will eventually be covered by the vegetation that existed before the disturbance—in this example, oak-hickory forest.

Animation

Ecological succession

http://qrs.ly/7b43dd4

241

The climax community model has been replaced by a view that change and disturbance go on continually. Fire, volcanic eruptions, climate change, non-native species, and human transformation of ecosystems create an ongoing process of disturbance in almost all ecosystems. Scientists now view communities as mosaics, each in different stages of ecological succession, each continually being reset by new disturbances.