Comparative Analysis Two Views on Texas Independence Documents 10.2 and 10.3

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Two Views on Texas Independence

In March 1836, U.S.-born Texans declared and independence republic. Under attack by Mexican forces at the Alamo, twenty-six–year-old Colonel William Travis and others appealed for reinforcements (Document 10.2). While all the men were killed, their appeals inspired hundreds of U.S. volunteers to join military efforts in Texas. They contributed to winning Texas independence, but that victory fueled intense debates over the question of annexation. Abolitionist and Quaker editor Benjamin Lundy was among those who argued that annexation would benefit the “Slaveholding Interest” (Document 10.3). These men offer competing perspectives on the relationship between Texas independence and national honor.

Document 10.2

Colonel William Travis | Appeal for Reinforcements, March 3, 1836

I hope your honorable body will hasten on reinforcements, ammunition, and provisions to our aid. . . . At least five hundred pounds of cannon powder, and two hundred rounds of six, nine, twelve, and eighteen pound balls—ten kegs of rifle powder, and a supply of lead, should be sent to this place without delay, under a sufficient guard.

If these things are promptly sent and large reinforcements are hastened to this frontier, this neighborhood will be the great and decisive battle ground. The power of Santa Ana is to be met here, or in the colonies; we had better meet them here, than to suffer a war of desolation to rage in our settlements. A blood-red banner waves from the church of Bejar, and in the camp above us, in token that the war is one of vengeance against rebels; they have declared us such, and demanded that we should surrender at discretion, or that this garrison should be put to the sword. Their threats have had no influence on me, or my men, but to make all fight with desperation, and that high souled courage which characterizes the patriot, who is willing to die in defence of his country’s liberty and his own honor.

The citizens of this municipality are all our enemies except those who have joined us heretofore; . . . those who have not joined us in this extremity, should be declared public enemies, and their property should aid in paying the expenses of the war.

The bearer of this will give your honorable body a statement more in detail should he escape through the enemies lines.

God and Texas—Victory or Death!!

Your obedient ser’t

W. Barrett Travis, Lieut. Col. Comm.

Source: Telegraph and Texas Register, March 12, 1836, 3.

Document 10.3

Benjamin Lundy | The War in Texas, 1836

It is generally admitted that the war in Texas has assumed a character which must seriously affect both the interests and honor of this nation. It implicates the conduct of a large number of our citizens, and even the policy and measures of the government are deeply involved in it. . . . The great fundamental principles of universal liberty—the perpetuity of our free republican institutions—the prosperity, the welfare, and the happiness of future generations—are measurably connected with the prospective issue of this fierce and bloody conflict.

But the prime cause and the real objects of this war are not distinctly understood by a large portion of the honest, disinterested, and well-meaning citizens of the United States. . . . [M]any of them have been deceived and misled by the misrepresentations of those concerned in it, and especially by hireling writers for the newspaper press. They have been induced to believe that the inhabitants of Texas were engaged in a legitimate contest for the maintenance of the sacred principles of Liberty, and the natural, inalienable Rights of Man: whereas. . . . the immediate cause and the leading object of this contest originated in a settled design, among the slaveholders of this country (with land speculators and slave-traders), to wrest the large and valuable territory of Texas from the Mexican Republic, in order to re-establish the SYSTEM OF SLAVERY; to open a vast and profitable SLAVE-MARKET therein; and, ultimately, to annex it to the United States. . . . The Slaveholding Interest is now paramount in the Executive branch of our national government; and its influence operates, indirectly, yet powerfully, through that medium, in favor of this Grand Scheme of Oppression and Tyrannical Usurpation. Whether the national Legislature will join hands with the Executive, and lend its aid to this most unwarrantable, aggressive attempt, will depend on the VOICE OF THE PEOPLE, expressed in their primary assemblies, by their petitions, and through the ballot-boxes.

Source: Benjamin Lundy, The War in Texas (Philadelphia: Merrihew and Gunn, 1836), 3.

Interpret the Evidence

  1. According to William Travis, why was it crucial for the United States to defend the Alamo and Texas independence?

  2. How would you compare Travis’s appeal for aid with Benjamin Lundy’s claims about the rationale for the war and the interests supporting independence? How does each define U.S. national interests?

Put It in Context

What do the battle for Texas independence and debates over Texas annexation reveal about sectional divisions in the United States in the 1830s and 1840s?