27
order ideas
Despite what you may believe, outlines are designed to make writing easier, not harder. You’ll feel more confident when you begin a project with a plan. The trick is to start simple and let outlines evolve to fit your needs.
Start with scratch outlines. After researching a topic, many writers sketch out a quick, informal outline — the verbal equivalent of the clever mechanical idea hastily drawn on a cocktail napkin. Good ideas do often emerge from simple, sometimes crude, notions that suddenly make sense when seen on paper. Both the Internet and the structure of the DNA molecule can be traced to such visualizations.
Bob Metcalfe’s original sketch of the Ethernet concept.
Courtesy of PARC, Inc., a Xerox company.
List key ideas. Scratch outlines usually begin with ragged lists. You simply write down your preliminary thoughts and key ideas so you can see exactly how they relate, merging any that obviously overlap. Keep these notes brief but specific, using words and phrases rather than complete sentences. At this point, you might find yourself posing questions too. In fact, your initial scratch outline might resemble a mildly edited brainstorming list (see Chapter 19). Here’s the first stage of a scratch outline addressing a topic much discussed in academia: the impact that massive open online courses (MOOCs) may have on higher education. (If you are unfamiliar with the term, you might do a quick Web search.)
Massive open online courses (MOOCs)
Taught by top-
First-
Rely on “superstar” professors
Can reach unlimited numbers of students across the country
How different from old-
Cheap: no classrooms; less administration; less “brick and mortar”
Less interaction with faculty
No face-
Available anytime and anywhere
Education through watching slick videos
Promise equal access to first-
Could replace large core courses at many schools
Use interactive online activities
Might drive down the high cost of postsecondary education
Differences between learning facts and gaining knowledge?
Very high attrition rate in early MOOCs
Depersonalized and dehumanizing: no real faculty-
A sprawling list like this could easily grow even longer, so you need to get it under control. To do that, you can apply the three principles that make outlining such a powerful tool of organization: relationship, subordination, and sequence.
Look for relationships. Examine the initial items on your list and try grouping like with like — or look for opposites and contrasts. Experiment with various arrangements or clusters. In the scratch outline above, for example, you might decide that the items fall into three basic categories. A first cluster explains what MOOCs do, a second cluster focuses on their advantages, while a third and lengthier cluster considers their weaknesses.
What MOOCs do
Taught by top-
Use video lectures and interactive online activities
Available anytime and anywhere
Can reach unlimited numbers of students across the country
Strengths of MOOCs
Cheap: no classrooms; less administration; less “brick and mortar”
Promise equal access to first-
Could replace large core courses at many schools
Might drive down the high cost of postsecondary education
Weaknesses of MOOCs
How different from old-
Less interaction with faculty
No face-
First-
Rely on “superstar” professors
Equate education to watching slick videos
Differences between learning facts and gaining knowledge?
Very high attrition rate in early MOOCs
Depersonalized and dehumanizing: no real faculty-
Subordinate ideas. In outlines, you routinely divide subjects into topics and subtopics. This means that some ideas belong not only grouped with others but also grouped under them — which is to say, they become a subset within a larger group.
For instance, looking again at the lengthy group of “Weaknesses of MOOCs,” you might notice that MOOCs seem to differ from old-
MOOCs are high-
Rely on well-
Require slick videos to keep students entertained
Cost more to produce than most schools can afford
Narrow the range of academic experiences
Then you notice a second cluster within the “Weaknesses of MOOCs” grouping, one related to your claim that MOOCs are “depersonalized and dehumanizing.” Once again, you subordinate some initial points to a broader claim, enlarging and connecting them.
MOOCs are depersonalized and dehumanizing
Support little interaction between online faculty and students
Minimize face-
Equate learning facts with gaining knowledge
[Consequently?] have a high attrition rate
At this point, you have pushed well beyond a list. You are using the outlining process to explore your ideas and turn them into, in this case, an argument.
Decide on a sequence. Once you have sorted out the patterns within an initial list of ideas, you are ready to arrange them to support a thesis. At this point, you have a great many options, depending on what type of project you are developing — a narrative, a report, an argument, or something else. You might sequence the items chronologically or by magnitude (for example, least to most important). Or you might determine your order rhetorically — by how you want readers to respond.
Continuing to pursue the MOOC project, you could, for example, do a detailed report on these new types of courses, focusing on what MOOCs do — the first cluster in your initial list of relationships. But, given the number of criticisms you generated of this technology, perhaps your heart is in writing an evaluation, one that weighs the strengths of MOOCs against the more numerous weaknesses you have identified. Your working outline, now considerably more formal than a scratch version, might look like the following:
Needless to say, this is but one of many possible takes on this subject, as proponents of MOOCs would be quick to point out.
Here’s an outline for a sermon titled “Unfulfilled Dreams” from a notebook of Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Frances M. Roberts/Newscom.
Move up to a formal outline.You may be required to submit a formal outline with your final paper. When that’s the case, be sure to follow the following guidelines—
Thesis: Though massive open online courses (MOOCs) promise to solve the problems of higher education, they are just upgraded versions of older correspondence courses that will dehumanize learning.