Differences in Risk Aversion Danny and Mel have different utility functions. Danny is highly risk-averse: a gain of $1,000 in income, which moves him from N to HD, adds only a few utils to his total utility, but a $1,000 fall in income, which moves him from N to LD, reduces his total utility by a large number of utils. By contrast, Mel gains almost as many utils from a $1,000 rise in income (the movement from N to HM) as he loses from a $1,000 fall in income (the movement from N to LM). This difference—reflected in the differing slopes of the two men’s marginal utility curves—means that Danny would be willing to pay much more than Mel for insurance.