Given these assumptions about preferences, we could create a list of all the consumer’s preferences between any possible bundles for every decision. But because such a list would include billions of possible bundles, it would be basically useless as a decision aid.
utility
A measure of how satisfied a consumer is.
Instead, economists use the concept of utility and a mathematical description called a utility function to describe preferences more simply. Utility describes how satisfied a consumer is. For practical purposes, you can think of utility as a fancy word for happiness or well-
utility function
A mathematical function that describes the relationship between what consumers actually consume and their level of well-
A utility function summarizes the relationship between what consumers consume and their level of well-
Utility functions can take a variety of mathematical forms. Let’s look at the utility someone enjoys from consuming Junior Mints and Kit Kats. Generically, we can write this utility level as U = U(J, K), where U(J, K) is the utility function and J and K are, respectively, the number of Junior Mints and Kit Kats the consumer eats. An example of a specific utility function for this consumer is U = J × K. In this case, utility equals the product of the number of Junior Mints and Kit Kats she eats. But it could instead be that the consumer’s utility equals the total number of Junior Mints and Kit Kats eaten. In that case, the utility function is U = J + K. Yet another possibility is that the consumer’s utility is given by U = J0.7K0.3. Because the exponent on Junior Mints (0.7) is larger than that on Kit Kats (0.3), this utility function implies that a given percentage increase in Junior Mints consumed will raise utility more than the same percentage increase in Kit Kats.
108
These are just a few examples from the large variety of possible utility functions we could imagine consumers having for these or any other combination of goods. At this point in our analysis of consumer behavior, we don’t have to be too restrictive about the form any particular utility function takes. Because utility functions are used to represent preferences, however, they have to conform to our four assumptions about preferences (rankability and completeness, more is better, transitivity, and variety is important).