Carrier proteins aid diffusion by binding substances

As we mentioned earlier, another type of facilitated diffusion involves the binding of the transported substance to a membrane protein called a carrier protein. Like channel proteins, carrier proteins facilitate the passive diffusion of substances into or out of cells or organelles. Carrier proteins transport polar molecules such as sugars and amino acids.

Glucose is the major energy source for most cells, and living systems require a great deal of it. Glucose is polar and cannot readily diffuse across membranes. Eukaryotic cell membranes contain a carrier protein—the glucose transporter—that facilitates glucose uptake into the cell. Binding of glucose to a specific three-dimensional site on one side of the transporter protein causes the protein to change its shape and release glucose on the other side of the membrane (Figure 6.12A). Since glucose is either broken down or otherwise removed almost as soon as it enters a cell, there is almost always a strong concentration gradient favoring glucose entry (that is, a higher concentration outside the cell than inside).

image
Figure 6.12 A Carrier Protein Facilitates Diffusion The glucose transporter is a carrier protein that allows glucose to enter the cell at a faster rate than would be possible by simple diffusion. (A) The transporter binds to glucose, brings it into the membrane interior, then changes shape, releasing glucose into the cell cytoplasm. (B) The graph shows the rate of glucose entry via a carrier versus the concentration of glucose outside the cell. As the glucose concentration increases, the rate of diffusion increases until the point at which all the available transporters are being used (the system is saturated).

Activity 6.4 Membrane Transport Simulation

www.life11e.com/ac6.4

Transport by carrier proteins is different from simple diffusion. In simple diffusion, the rate of movement depends on the concentration gradient across the membrane. This is also true for carrier-mediated transport, up to a point. In carrier-mediated transport, as the concentration gradient increases, the diffusion rate also increases, but its rate of increase slows, and a point is reached at which the diffusion rate becomes constant. At this point, the facilitated diffusion system is said to be saturated (Figure 6.12B). This is explained by the fact that a particular cell has a specific number of carrier protein molecules in its cell membrane.

The rate of diffusion reaches a maximum when all the carrier molecules are fully loaded with solute molecules. Think of waiting for the elevator on the ground floor of a hotel with 50 other people. You can’t all get in the elevator (carrier) at once, so the rate of transport (say, ten people at a time) is at its maximum, and the transport system is “saturated.” As a consequence, cells that require large amounts of energy, such as muscle cells, have high concentrations of glucose transporters in their membranes so that the maximum rate of facilitated diffusion is greater. Likewise, the human brain has high glucose needs, and the blood vessels that nourish it have high concentrations of glucose transporters.

122

investigating life

Aquaporins Increase Membrane Permeability to Water

experiment

Original Paper: Preston, G. M., T. P. Carroll, W. B. Gugino and P. Agre. 1992. Appearance of water channels in Xenopus oocytes expressing red cell CHIP28 protein. Science 256: 385–387.

A protein was isolated from the membranes of cells in which water diffuses rapidly across the membranes. When the protein was inserted into oocytes, which do not normally have it, the water permeability of the oocytes was greatly increased.

image

work with the data

Although diffusion can account for limited water movement across cell membranes, simple diffusion seemed unlikely to explain the considerable water movement in kidney and red blood cells. By chance, Peter Agre and his colleagues found a major membrane protein, CHIP28, shared by these two cell types, and hypothesized that it was responsible for cell membrane water transport. So they did a “what if” experiment, taking the mRNA for CHIP28 and injecting it into frog oocytes that do not normally make the protein.

QUESTIONS

Question 1

Frog oocytes in isotonic liquid were injected with either a small amount of water (control) or with CHIP28 mRNA in a small amount of water. The oocytes were then transferred to a hypotonic medium, and changes in relative cell volume were measured by microscopy. Table A shows the results.

Table A
Cell volume
Time (min) CHIP28 mRNA Water only (control)
0 1.0 1.0
0.5 1.05 1.0
1 1.15 1.02
1.5 1.23
2 1.32 1.02
2.5 1.36
3 1.41 1.02
4 (burst) 1.03

Plot the data on a graph of relative cell volume versus time after injection. How do the mRNA and control eggs compare? What explains the increase in the volume of the mRNA-injected oocytes? What explains the situation with both cells at 4 minutes after injection?

The mRNA-injected oocytes swelled because of osmotic uptake of water. At 4 minutes, the mRNA-injected cells had taken up so much water that they burst. The control cells did not take up excess water and therefore stayed intact.

Question 2

Water permeability (Pf) was calculated by the rate of osmotic swelling. Table B shows the results when increasing amounts of CHIP28 mRNA were injected.

Table B
Amount of mRNA (ng) Pf (cm/sec × 10–4)a
0 13.7 (3.3)
0.1 50.0 (10.1)
0.5 112 (29.2)
2.0 175 (38.4)
10.0 221 (14.8)

a Numbers in parentheses indicate +/– standard deviation.

What can you conclude from these data? What statistical test (see Appendix B) would you do to show the significance of your conclusion?

Water permeability increased with more mRNA injected, presumably because there was more aquaporin in the membranes that had more mRNA. The relationship could be evaluated statistically by linear regression.

Question 3

To further investigate the role of CHIP28 in water transport, oocytes were given a known inhibitor of protein-mediated water transport, mercuric chloride, and then tested for water permeability with CHIP28 mRNA. Some of the eggs were also treated with mercaptoethanol, a molecule that overcomes the inhibition of water transport by mercuric chloride. The question was, would the inhibitor actually block water transport mediated by CHIP28, and would mercaptoethanol restore transport? The results are shown in Table C.

Table C
mRNA injected Mercuric
chloride
Mercapto-
ethanol
Pf (cm/sec × 10–4)
None None None 27.9
None Yes None 20.3
None Yes Yes 25.4
CHIP28 None None 210
CHIP28 Yes None 80.7
CHIP28 Yes Yes 188

What can you conclude about the molecular nature of water transport mediated by CHIP28 mRNA? What data support your conclusion? Explain all the controls that were done.

The data on the mRNA-injected oocytes for mercuric chloride alone showed reduced water permeability, indicating that a protein was involved. Adding mercaptoethanol restored water permeability. There was not much water permeability in the controls without added mRNA, and mercuric chloride and mercaptoethanol had no effect on this.

A similar work with the data exercise may be assigned in LaunchPad.