We can recognize many species by their appearance

Someone who is knowledgeable about a group of organisms, such as birds or flowering plants, can usually distinguish the different species found in a particular area simply by looking at them. Standard field guides to birds, mammals, insects, and wildflowers are possible only because many species change little in appearance over large geographic distances (Figure 22.1A).

image
Figure 22.1 Not All Members of the Same Species Look Alike (A) It is easy to identify these two male hooded mergansers as members of the same species, even though they were photographed thousands of miles apart in British Columbia and New Mexico, respectively. Despite their geographic separation, the two individuals are morphologically very similar. (B) Hooded mergansers are sexually dimorphic, which means the female’s appearance is quite different from that of the male.

More than 250 years ago, Carolus Linnaeus developed the system of binomial nomenclature by which species are named today (see Key Concept 21.4). Linnaeus described and named thousands of species, but because he knew nothing about the genetics or the mating behavior of the organisms he was naming, he classified them on the basis of their appearance alone. In other words, Linnaeus used a morphological species concept, a construct that assumes that a species comprises individuals that “look alike” and that individuals that do not look alike belong to different species. Although Linnaeus could not have known it, the members of most of the groups he classified as species look alike because they share many alleles of the genes that code for their morphological features.

Using morphology to define species has limitations. Members of the same species do not always look alike. For example, males, females, and young individuals do not always resemble one another closely (Figure 22.1B). Furthermore, morphology is of little use in the case of cryptic species—instances in which two or more species are morphologically indistinguishable but do not interbreed (Figure 22.2). Biologists therefore cannot rely on appearance alone in determining whether individual organisms are members of the same or different species. Today, biologists use several additional types of information—especially behavioral and genetic data—to differentiate species.

image
Figure 22.2 Cryptic Species Look Alike but Do Not Interbreed These two species of gray tree frogs cannot be distinguished by their external morphology, but they do not interbreed even when they occupy the same geographic range. (A) Hyla versicolor is a tetraploid species (four sets of chromosomes), whereas (B) H. chrysoscelis is diploid (two sets of chromosomes). And although they look alike, the males have distinctive mating calls; female frogs recognize and mate with males of their own species based on these calls.