Diversity loss at one scale affects diversity loss at other scales

As you have seen in Key Concept 56.1, biodiversity is central to the interconnectedness of various levels of biological organization, from genes to species to communities. Thus the loss of diversity at one scale affects the loss of diversity at other scales (Figure 58.1). For example, when human-caused activities reduce the number of individuals in a population, they reduce what is called the effective population size, or the number of individuals that can contribute offspring to the next generation (Focus: Key Figure 58.2), resulting in further population size decline, or what has been termed an “extinction vortex.” How does the effective population size continue to decline? First, small populations are more likely to experience *genetic drift and inbreeding, which can lead to reduced genetic diversity and inbreeding depression. Second, when population sizes are small, there is also a greater chance of demographic stochasticity, or fluctuations in population size as the result of random differences among individuals in reproduction and survival. For example, a small population might have, by chance, fewer females than males, resulting in fewer offspring than expected if the sex ratio were reversed. Finally, external mortality events such as extreme weather or habitat destruction can have devastating effects on small populations by increasing their chance of extinction even if only a small number of individuals are killed.

*connect the concepts As described in Key Concept 12.3, inbreeding depression is a state of reduced biological fitness in a population arising from mating among close relatives that tend to have the same recessive, sometimes deleterious, alleles. Key Concept 21.2 describes how in small populations, genetic drift—random changes in allele frequencies from one generation to the next—may produce large changes in allele frequencies over time. Harmful alleles may increase in frequency, and rare advantageous alleles may be lost.

image
Figure 58.1 Biodiversity Loss Is Interconnected across Scales Human activities have caused the rapid decline of biodiversity, or the loss of diversity at genetic, population, species, ecosystem, and global scales. Implicit in biodiversity loss is the concept that the loss of diversity at one scale affects the loss of diversity at other scales (see Figure 56.5).

focus: key figure

image
Figure 58.2 Extinction Vortex Human-caused and natural events can reduce the effective population size (number of individuals that can contribute offspring to the next generation) of species, eventually leading to population and species extinctions.

Question

Q: Explain how the chytrid fungal pathogen described in the opening story could cause the extinction of a species such as the harlequin frog.

The chytrid fungal pathogen leads to high mortality of frogs, thus lowering their population size. As population size declines, there is greater chance of inbreeding depression, genetic drift, and demographic stochasticity, which decrease genetic diversity. As genetic diversity declines, individual fitness declines, leading to lower reproduction and higher mortality in the population. This causes the population to continue to maintain a lower effective population size, which can ultimately lead to extinction at the population and species level.

1251

Biodiversity loss is also connected at higher metapopulation, species, and ecosystem levels (see Figure 58.1). For example, you know from Key Concept 54.4 that the larger the metapopulation, the greater the chance that dispersal among source populations can rescue sink populations from extinction. As more local populations become extinct, and as more metapopulations are compromised, there is a greater risk that species will become extinct as well. Unfortunately, if some of those species play critical roles in their ecosystems—if they are, for example, keystone or foundation species—the possibility exists that other species will be threatened with extinction as well. As species diversity declines in ecosystems, biodiversity loss manifests itself at larger regional, continental, and even global scales (see Figure 58.1).

There are many examples of how a series of unfortunate events at different levels of biodiversity has led to the extinction of species (or subspecies, in the case below). Consider the heath hen (Tympanuchus cupido cupido), a large bird in the grouse family (Figure 58.3A). Heath hens were common from Maine to Virginia prior to the 1800s but were hunted extensively for food. By 1830 only one population, on the island of Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, was left. By 1908 only 50 birds remained, and a reserve was established to recover the population, which eventually grew to several thousand birds. Unfortunately, in 1916 a fire and a series of environmental factors that included a hard winter, an influx of predators, and a poultry disease caused the population size to decline dramatically. By 1928 demographic stochasticity and inbreeding depression set in, leaving only 13 individuals—2 females and 11 males. Four years later, the heath hen was extinct.

image
Figure 58.3 Species Extinctions: Going, Going . . . (A) The heath hen (left) became extinct in 1932. In 2008 the pygmy tarsier (right) was discovered in an Indonesian national park after having been presumed extinct for 85 years. (B) The pie chart shows the breakdown by extinction risk category of 59,033 species assessed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. The bar graph shows the number of species in the various extinction risk categories (three of which are together termed “threatened”) in taxonomic groups that have been comprehensively assessed.

Question

Q: What percentage of species are extinct versus threatened with extinction? Of those species, which taxonomic group has experienced the most extinction and which is most at risk of extinction?

Of the 59,033 species categorized by the IUCN, 1 percent are extinct and 20 percent are threatened. Birds have suffered the most extinctions (~150 species), but amphibians are most at risk of extinction (~1,900 species).