Habitat loss and degradation endanger species

Most scientists agree that, up to this point in human history, habitat loss (reduction in habitat quantity) and habitat degradation (reduction in habitat quality) have been the major culprits in biodiversity loss. Our human footprint is large—it is estimated that we have transformed 50%–60% of the land surface, primarily for agriculture, timber, and livestock grazing. The building of infrastructure, such as cities, transportation corridors, and utilities (including hydroelectric dams) has altered another 2%–3% of Earth’s surface.

As humans increasingly dominate the planet, the transformations they are causing affect whole biomes and the species dependent on them. For example, the current rate of loss of tropical rainforest—Earth’s most species-rich biome—is about 2 percent of the remaining forest each year due to the increasing demands of a rapidly expanding human population for forest products and cleared agricultural land. Most of the rainforests of Asia have already been reduced to small fragments, with the only extensive remaining tracts being found on the islands of New Guinea and, to a much lesser extent, Borneo (Figure 58.4). As of 2016, the greatest amount of tropical rainforest deforestation had taken place in Brazil. If the current rate of loss continues, millions of rainforest species could become extinct before the end of this century.

image
Figure 58.4 The Disappearing Tropical Forest Rainforests, the most abundant tropical forests, have long been recognized as centers of biodiversity that harbor vast numbers of species (see rainforest biome, p. 1154). Since the 1950s, tropical forests have been cleared for agriculture, highways, timber resources, and other needs of an exploding human population.

1254

Physical destruction of habitat, as when tropical rainforests are cut down or wetlands are drained and converted to agricultural use, has significant effects on the distributions and abundances of species. Reductions in suitable habitat have contributed to the extinction of thousands of species. As the remaining habitat gets divided into smaller and smaller fragments, it can become further degraded by edge effects (as you saw in Investigating Life: The Largest Experiment on Earth in Chapter 53 and Animation 53.4, Edge Effects). Recall that as habitat fragments become smaller, proportionally more land is exposed to edge effects (see Key Concept 53.5). The physical conditions at the edges of habitats often are more similar to those of the new habitat than to the original habitat, and this can be physically stressful for species acclimated to the original habitat. In addition, species from surrounding habitats can colonize the edges, where they may compete with or prey on the species living in the fragment.

One effect of forest fragmentation in much of North America has been an increase in the abundance of the brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater), a brood parasite that lays its eggs in the nests of other bird species. Nestlings of a brood parasite are raised by the host parents, to the detriment of their own young (Figure 58.5A). Historically, cowbirds followed bison and other grazing mammals, feeding on insects kicked up by the herds; thus their eggs were laid primarily in nests of grassland host species. Forest fragmentation has opened up new opportunities for the cowbirds, which can now lay their eggs in the nests of forest birds in habitat edges, affecting nestling mortality and fledgling success (Figure 58.5B). Fragmented forests, with relatively more edge than intact forest, thus favor the proliferation of cowbirds at the expense of forest birds.

image
Figure 58.5 Cowbird Parasitism at Forest Edges (A) Cowbirds are nest parasites—they lay their eggs (black speckled) in the nests of host bird species and depend on them to raise their young (note the large cowbird chick). (B) At forest edges, host birds have higher nestling loss and lower fledging success as a result of cowbird parasitism.

Pollution is another cause of habitat loss and degradation. The negative effects of acid rain (see Key Concept 57.4), for example, have greatly affected lake and forest ecosystems. Among the most troublesome toxic pollutants in ecosystems today are heavy metal waste products of mining and manufacturing, and synthetic organic chemicals (pesticides) released into the environment to control pests. Multiple studies have implicated a variety of pesticides in the decline of amphibian species, particularly in areas with intense agriculture such as California and the midwestern United States.

A relatively hidden form of pollution comes from nondegradable plastic garbage in open ocean habitats (Figure 58.6). One garbage patch in the middle of the Pacific Ocean is estimated to be the size of Texas. Plastic is broken up into smaller pieces and when ingested by marine birds, mammals, or fish can be a choking hazard or disrupt endocrine functions such as reproduction, neural development, and immune function. Plastic or abandoned fishing nets can also entangle marine organisms, including marine mammals, resulting in death.

image
Figure 58.6 Plastic Ocean Large amounts of plastic garbage have accumulated in the North Pacific Gyre, degrading the pelagic environment. Inset is a photo of tiny bits of plastic comingled with a sample of water taken from the vicinity of the North Pacific Gyre garbage patch.