Race and the Enlightenment

If philosophers did not believe the lower classes qualified for enlightenment, how did they regard individuals of different races? In recent years, historians have found in the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment a crucial turning point in European ideas about race. A primary catalyst for new ideas about race was the urge to classify nature, an urge unleashed by the Scientific Revolution’s insistence on careful empirical observation. As scientists developed taxonomies of plant and animal species, they also began to classify humans into hierarchically ordered “races.”

Using the word race to designate biologically distinct groups of humans, akin to distinct animal species, was new. Previously, Europeans grouped other peoples into “nations” based on their historical, political, and cultural affiliations, rather than on supposedly innate physical differences. When European thinkers drew up a hierarchical classification of human species, their own “race” was placed, of course, at the top. Europeans had long believed they were culturally superior. Now emerging ideas about racial difference told them they were biologically superior as well. In turn, scientific racism helped legitimate and justify the tremendous growth of slavery that occurred during the eighteenth century.

Racist ideas did not go unchallenged. The abbé Raynal’s History of the Two Indies (1770) fiercely attacked slavery and the abuses of European colonization. Encyclopedia editor Denis Diderot adopted Montesquieu’s technique of criticizing European attitudes through the voice of outsiders in his dialogue between Tahitian villagers and their European visitors. Scottish philosopher James Beattie (1735–1803) responded directly to claims of white superiority by pointing out that Europeans had started out as savage as nonwhites supposedly were and that many non-European peoples in the Americas, Asia, and Africa had achieved high levels of civilization. Former slaves, like Olaudah Equiano (see Chapter 17) and Ottobah Cugoana published eloquent memoirs testifying to the horrors of slavery and the innate equality of all humans. These challenges to racism, however, were in the minority. Many other Enlightenment voices supporting racial inequality — Thomas Jefferson among them — may be found.

image
Encyclopedia Image of the Cotton IndustryThis romanticized image of slavery in the West Indies cotton industry was published in Diderot and d’Alembert’s Encyclopedia. It shows enslaved men, at right, gathering and picking over cotton bolls, while the woman at left mills the bolls to remove their seeds. The Encyclopedia presented mixed views on slavery; one article described it as “indispensable” to economic development, while others argued passionately for the natural right to freedom of all mankind. (Courtesy, Dover Publications. From Denis Diderot, Pictorial Encyclopedia of Trades and Industry, edited by Charles C. Gillispie (Dover Publications, 1959).)

>QUICK REVIEW

How did Enlightenment thinkers challenge the social, political, and cultural status quo? In what ways did they reinforce it?