The high cost of the Seven Years’ War doubled the British national debt. Anticipating further expenses to defend newly conquered territories, the government in London broke with a tradition of loose colonial oversight and announced that they would maintain a large army in North America and tax the colonies directly. In 1765, Parliament passed the Stamp Act, which levied taxes on a long list of commercial and legal documents, diplomas, newspapers, almanacs, and playing cards.
These measures seemed perfectly reasonable to the British: a much heavier stamp tax already existed in Britain, and proceeds from the tax were to fund the defense of the colonies. Nonetheless, the colonists vigorously protested the Stamp Act by rioting and by boycotting British goods. Thus Parliament reluctantly repealed it.
This dispute raised important political questions. To what extent could the British government reassert its power while limiting the authority of elected colonial bodies? Who had the right to make laws for Americans? The British government replied that Americans were represented in Parliament, albeit indirectly (like most British people), and that Parliament ruled throughout the empire. Many Americans felt otherwise. Thus British colonial administration and parliamentary supremacy came to appear as unacceptable threats to existing American liberties.
Americans’ resistance to these threats was fed by the great degree of independence they had long enjoyed. In British North America, unlike in England and Europe, no powerful established church existed, and religious freedom was taken for granted. Colonial assemblies made the important laws. Also, the right to vote was much more widespread than in England. Moreover, greater political equality was matched by greater social and economic equality, at least for the free white population.
In 1773, disputes over taxes and representation flared up again. Under the Tea Act of that year, the British government permitted the East India Company to ship tea from China directly to its agents in the colonies rather than through London middlemen, who sold to independent merchants in the colonies. Thus the company secured a profitable monopoly on the tea trade, and colonial merchants were excluded.
In protest, Boston men disguised as Native Americans staged a rowdy protest (later called the Boston Tea Party) by boarding East India Company ships and throwing tea from them into the harbor. In response, the so-