Document 15-3: The Bill of Rights (1689)

The English Place Limits on Monarchical Power

The Bill of Rights (1689)

Almost a century of struggle between the forces of constitutionalism and absolutism in England culminated in the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights was an unequivocal statement that Parliament, not the monarch, was the source of English law and that all Englishmen, including the monarch, were subject to the law. Acceptance of the Bill of Rights was a non-negotiable condition of the ascendency of William and Mary to the English throne. Thus, the very first act of the new monarchs was an acknowledgment of the limits of their power. As you read this excerpt, think about what it reveals about late-seventeenth-century notions of freedom and tyranny. What kinds of abuses of power did Parliament fear? What rights and liberties did it seek to protect?

Whereas the late King James the Second, by the assistance of divers evil counsellors, judges and ministers employed by him, did endeavour to subvert and extirpate the Protestant religion and the laws and liberties of this kingdom;

By assuming and exercising a power of dispensing with and suspending of laws and the execution of laws without consent of Parliament;

By committing and prosecuting divers worthy prelates for humbly petitioning to be excused from concurring to the said assumed power;

By issuing and causing to be executed a commission under the great seal for erecting a court called the Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes;

By levying money for and to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative for other time and in other manner than the same was granted by Parliament;

By raising and keeping a standing army within this kingdom in time of peace without consent of Parliament, and quartering soldiers contrary to law;

By causing several good subjects being Protestants to be disarmed at the same time when papists were both armed and employed contrary to law;

By violating the freedom of election of members to serve in Parliament;

By prosecutions in the Court of King’s Bench for matters and causes cognizable only in Parliament, and by divers other arbitrary and illegal courses;

And whereas of late years partial corrupt and unqualified persons have been returned and served on juries in trials, and particularly divers jurors in trials for high treason which were not freeholders;

And excessive bail hath been required of persons committed in criminal cases to elude the benefit of the laws made for the liberty of the subjects;

And excessive fines have been imposed;

And illegal and cruel punishments inflicted;

And several grants and promises made of fines and forfeitures before any conviction or judgment against the persons upon whom the same were to be levied;

All which are utterly and directly contrary to the known laws and statutes and freedom of this realm;

And whereas the said late King James the Second having abdicated the government and the throne being thereby vacant, his Highness the prince of Orange (whom it hath pleased Almighty God to make the glorious instrument of delivering this kingdom from popery and arbitrary power) did (by the advice of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and divers principal persons of the Commons) cause letters to be written to the Lords Spiritual and Temporal being Protestants, and other letters to the several counties, cities, universities, boroughs and cinque ports, for the choosing of such persons to represent them as were of right to be sent to Parliament, to meet and sit at Westminster upon the two and twentieth day of January in this year one thousand six hundred eighty and eight [old-style date], in order to such an establishment as that their religion, laws and liberties might not again be in danger of being subverted, upon which letters elections having been accordingly made;

And thereupon the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons, pursuant to their respective letters and elections, being now assembled in a full and free representative of this nation, taking into their most serious consideration the best means for attaining the ends aforesaid, do in the first place (as their ancestors in like case have usually done) for the vindicating and asserting their ancient rights and liberties declare

That the pretended power of suspending the laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal;

That the pretended power of dispensing with laws or the execution of laws by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal;

That the commission for erecting the late Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature, are illegal and pernicious;

That levying money for or to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative, without grant of Parliament, for longer time, or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal;

That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal;

That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of Parliament, is against law;

That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law;

That election of members of Parliament ought to be free;

That the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in Parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Parliament;

That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted;

That jurors ought to be duly impanelled and returned, and jurors which pass upon men in trials for high treason ought to be freeholders;

That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void;

And that for redress of all grievances, and for the amending, strengthening and preserving of the laws, Parliaments ought to be held frequently.

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/17th_century/england.asp.

READING QUESTIONS

  1. Question

    uQP+m3K7JQ/HxLutZPAN79CL/DPWW/Q38UQcH+xGDR6vOnekTV5AYG1dkfyB+P+/jKeBN4+X/Gxyp/EO14T0H/k0FBrk0ydF6cXrFKpzClkN2CVh
  2. Question

    GggxMYM9LAtFdruACoy2KssRsqTD7TKzEMfBdFN/y+ppeiVB8DeaKWAO2SSn3jrEZGuYjHc1pbTHa6RGuT6rSvXJyl7MeTNNR4I2A9Ov8Q4eTp937C7mXfQCXU5NFY4c4AAKGTiQrpW5Ev+WC2wnuxfiGh44hj3zL3mD3rMDCvAscbOP
  3. Question

    jzQOlYE/i1U8nhRim/xUk0REclzXi+DMHH3o1gTSuTNmf75FyVzlpLJ4dSQ/2y9Rg77HPBJ6DlXhJ8jZfzLhThfohveYWc3DfU0CE7E8i/DrTFPAE51I06b8bWldnVflu/mnuI1HiPj8FxAx/OXk7pDiJF8LQYcx45KYrinGGOszKbKq63uYcIx6CGpcXUK7dE6qvLDgU5/sM4Gjj2634jgbNOjXNn4CI1jVRZyd9ereifCbeVtrDCfzlezTLGelacYYwdfwzEWcFM97cZ/vFfQJ1vsv+TsLyaO0wGjugTOzz0j40O/kVA==