Document 7-6: Procopius Of Caesarea, The Secret History (ca. 550)

The Secret History (ca. 550)

Procopius of Caesarea was not a neutral observer of events. He believed that his society was on the verge of collapse and that Justinian bore considerable responsibility for the imminent catastrophe. Far from seeing the emperor as a valiant reformer, Procopius saw him as a subversive force, a man whose blind ambition and criminal disregard for the consequences of his actions led him to promote policies that were antithetical to good social order and the long-term health of the empire. As you read this excerpt from The Secret History, published only after Procopius’s death, pay particular attention to the connections Procopius made between the emperor’s personal vices and what Procopius saw as the decay of Byzantine society. What does his attack on Justinian tell us about Procopius’s own social and political views?

Everything was done at the wrong time, and nothing that was established was allowed to continue. To prevent my narrative being interminable, I will merely mention a few instances, and pass over the remainder in silence. In the first place, Justinian neither possessed in himself the appearance of Imperial dignity, nor demanded that it should be respected by others, but imitated the barbarians in language, appearance, and ideas. When he had to issue an Imperial decree, he did not entrust it to the Quaestor1 in the usual way, but for the most part delivered it himself by word of mouth, although he spoke his own language like a foreigner; or else he left it in the hands of one of those by whom he was surrounded, so that those who had been injured by such resolutions did not know to whom to apply.

Those [secretaries] who . . . had from very ancient times fulfilled the duty of writing the secret dispatches of the Emperor, were no longer allowed to retain their privileges; for he himself wrote them nearly all, even the sentences of the municipal magistrates, no one throughout the Roman world being permitted to administer justice with a free hand. He took everything upon himself with unreasoning arrogance, and so managed cases that were to be decided, that, after he had heard one of the litigants, he immediately pronounced his verdict and obliged them to submit to it, acting in accordance with no law or principle of justice, but being evidently overpowered by shameful greed. For the Emperor was not ashamed to take bribes, since his avarice had deprived him of all feelings of shame. It frequently happened that the decrees of the Senate and the edicts of the Emperor were opposed to each other; for the Senate was as it were but an empty shadow, without the power of giving its vote or of keeping up its dignity; it was assembled merely for form’s sake and in order to keep up an ancient custom, for none of its members were allowed to utter a single word. But the Emperor and his consort2 took upon themselves the consideration of questions that were to be discussed, and whatever resolutions they came to between themselves prevailed. If he whose cause had been victorious had any doubt as to the legality of his success, all he had to do was to make a present of gold to the Emperor, who immediately promulgated a law contrary to all those formerly in force. If, again, anyone else desired the revival of the law that had been repealed, the autocrat did not disdain to revoke the existing order of things and to reestablish it. There was nothing stable in his authority, but the balance of justice inclined to one side or the other, according to the weight of gold in either scale. In the market-place there were buildings under the management of palace officials, where traffic was carried on, not only in judicial, but also in legislative decisions. The officers called “Referendars” [or mediators] found it difficult to present the requests of petitioners to the Emperor, and still more difficult to bring before the council in the usual manner the answer proper to be made to each of them; but, gathering together from all quarters worthless and false testimony, they deceived Justinian, who was naturally a fit subject for deception, by fallacious reports and misleading statements. Then, immediately going out to the contending parties, without acquainting them with the conversation that had taken place, they extorted from them as much money as they required, without anyone venturing to oppose them.

Even the soldiers of the Praetorian guard,3 whose duty it was to attend the judges in the court of the palace, forced from them whatsoever judgments they pleased. All, so to speak, abandoned their own sphere of duty, and followed the paths that pleased them, however difficult or untrodden they had previously been. Everything was out of gear; offices were degraded, not even their names being preserved. In a word, the Empire resembled a queen over boys at play.

From Procopius, Literally and Completely Translated from the Greek for the First Time (Athens: Athenian Society, 1896), pp. 116–121.

READING QUESTIONS

  1. Question

    QDOPqQFK82Kod7qvwXRvmeY4xEArs7bfHhunNbmRohvcdu97/BlZVZa3WqEffys6peFM1rsThakG5eGZ0tr9vUQlzrl1rlzWrFND/K61lW+M2ir4oeE1yLq2MkKTIVBSPzYCFoVkLRGroerqql1li8Kf0Cta5fyLqDNhyd/PtLxiHphhROz9I7bvEP35eosMuwaar9hmEX3Gy0ZEdfosn60iRl/cEcG3ogPjBhqE9ME=
  2. Question

    WyDZ7u86oORYXu1fXaxTWljclrqHcMskKkRtOBFInj3cp98JDz2ZxjfjQlL7m0bhnz7PHhkXbKcC/mRFtTi8/S4huhCrN+MX6PcuGQN/YoEySrFNjXQw4nFgK/E/BWvhFhZqdMtEIqqd2e0y4zgy1pk9UX7G9RLHWQK2NXDKVMHqPoCjG562S7iyEhU=
  3. Question

    2NrjDWWviMoYVcz/NT1ZdHvhC1XB0tUsQrDUR3ZIw/4m8zf6NKT2bG+6CUA+mNV96raVfumhJuiJVg5Pr2VJPXUhOKHKy0ki9jMBikPvnwajBp7HfymUxhX/urXEv/lNNwtI6lSnmMicCzwQEifye2lqzcvICw8C2If7ikyj/5o=