Document 9-6: Guibert Of Nogent/Anna Comnena, Peter the Hermit and the “People’s Crusade” (ca. 1108–1148)

Peter the Hermit and the “People’s Crusade” (ca. 1108–1148)

Peter the Hermit (d. 1115) was, perhaps, the most important leader of the “People’s Crusade,” a spontaneous effort by ordinary Europeans to join in the battle for Jerusalem. An itinerant preacher, Peter led a sizable group of followers to the Holy Land. In the end, the People’s Crusade was an abject failure. Largely untrained and poorly led, its participants were obliterated by the well-trained, battle-tested Turks. Two documents related to Peter are included here. The first, written by the Benedictine monk Guibert of Nogent (ca. 1055–1124), offers a contemporaneous account of Peter’s early activities. The second, written by Anna Comnena (1083–1153), daughter of the Byzantine emperor Alexius I, describes the calamitous end of Peter’s expedition.

[Guibert of Nogent’s Version]

Therefore, while the princes, who felt the need of many expenses and great services from their attendants, made their preparations slowly and carefully; the common people who had little property, but were very numerous, joined a certain Peter the Hermit, and obeyed him as a master while these affairs were going on among us.

He was, if I am not mistaken, from the city of Amiens, and we have learned that he had lived as a hermit, dressed as a monk, somewhere in Upper Gaul. After he had departed from there — I do not know with what intention — we saw him going through the cities and towns under a pretense of preaching. He was surrounded by so great throngs of people, he received such enormous gifts, his holiness was lauded so highly, that no one within my memory has been held in such honor.

He was very liberal in the distribution to the poor of what he had received. He restored prostitutes to their husbands with gifts. By his wonderful authority he restored everywhere peace and concord, in place of discord. For in whatever he did or said it seemed as if there was something divine, especially when the hairs were snatched from his mule for relics. We do not report this as true, but for the common people who love novelties. He wore a woolen shirt, and over it a mantle reaching to his ankles; his arms and feet were bare. He lived on wine and fish; he hardly ever, or never, ate bread.

[Anna Comnena’s Version]

[Just prior to the events described below, Peter and his army had been routed by the Turks. With his forces weakened, Peter was warned by Emperor Alexius I not to risk another engagement with the enemy. His decision to ignore the emperor’s advice would prove disastrous.]

But relying on the multitude of those who followed him, Peter did not heed the warning and, after crossing the strait1 pitched camp at a little town called Helenopolis.

But since there were also Normans in his army, estimated at about ten thousand men, these, separating themselves from the rest of the body, devastated the region lying around the city of Nicaea, rioting most cruelly in every way. For they tore some of the children apart, limb from limb and, piercing others through with wooden stakes, roasted them in fire; likewise, upon those advanced in years they inflicted every kind of torture. When those in the city saw this being done, they opened the gates and went out against them. As a result, a fierce battle took place, in which, since the Normans fought ferociously, the citizens were hurled back into the fortress. The Normans, after gathering up all the plunder, again returned to Helenopolis. There a quarrel arose between themselves and the other pilgrims who had not gone off with them, a thing which usually happens in an affair of this kind, envy inflaming the wrath of those left behind, and a riotous fight followed the quarrel. The fierce Normans again separated [from the others] and captured Xerogord on their way at the first attack.

When this was learned, the Sultan sent Elchanes against them with a suitable number of troops. When he reached them, he recaptured Xerogord, killed some of the Normans with the sword, and carried off the rest as captives, planning at the same time, also, an attack upon those who had remained with Kuku-Peter.2 And he set ambushes at opportune places into which, when they left for Nicaea, they would unexpectedly fall and be killed. But knowing also of the avarice of the Gauls, he had summoned two men of bold spirit and ordered them to go to the camp of Kuku-Peter to announce that the Normans had captured Nicaea and were now sacking it to the utmost. This report, brought to the camp of Peter, excited all violently; for when the mention of plunder and riches was heard, they straightway set out in tumult on the road which leads to Nicaea, forgetful of their military training and of observing discipline in going out to battle. For the Latins are not only most fond of riches, as we said above, but when they give themselves to raiding any region for plunder, are also no longer obedient to reason, or any other check. Accordingly, since they were neither keeping order nor forming into lines, they fell into the ambush of the Turks around Draco and were wretchedly cut to pieces. Indeed, so great a multitude of Gauls and Normans were cut down by the Ishmaelite sword that when the dead bodies of the killed, which were lying all about in the place, were brought together, they made a very great mound, or hill, or look-out place, lofty as a mountain, and occupying a space very conspicuous for its width and depth. So high did that mound of bones tower, that some barbarians of the same race as the killed later used the bones of the slain instead of stones in constructing a wall, thus making that fortress a sort of sepulchre for them. It stands to this day, an enclosure of walls built with mixed rocks and bones.

And thus, after all had been wiped out in the slaughter, Peter returned with only a few to Helenopolis. The Turks, in their desire to get him into their power, again beset him with an ambush. But when the Emperor heard of the whole affair and learned how great was the slaughter of men, he held it very wrong that Peter should also be taken. Immediately, therefore, he summoned Catacalon Constantine Euphorbenus, of whom mention has often been made in this history, and sent him with suitable forces on war-vessels across the sea as a succour to Peter. When the Turks saw him approach, they fled. . . .

From Edward Peters, ed., The First Crusade: The Chronicle of Fulcher and Other Source Materials, 2d ed. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998), pp. 103, 112–115.

READING QUESTIONS

  1. Question

    fejVBTC6GJrALrdsDAWNygdR+jSqtXzZMrlGr8eezMhYIX6gRpY1aj1ITOn6SXJpdMkDE5RmNMd3XY2KUFH87JS2J0rauJ9/H/qbekFCqNBkc/xIdL3dMBhVobxUL2MKKQ9ebe8qjMVnndIbTJKPMrH957RZMDFkXO5gIpLiCCQ0F04cWPJqRRsh6WiVdrHV+wvtIPCo0rTjJEcz
  2. Question

    Yu4WR6Y2g983neo550t0ZeTQlRvYgWPeYgZHuKAN9ZGoGVNQSVTEHjJRQYfTK+f8pi7620LawKdZU/wbSZK1Dq4nurvvv/DgTXF3F5zLAHQbT/S6cWS7+5RBw2Kj2SoYzwoMsDDRHNgOI0R7H5QkOgOKObr8bTxBQo2DtX/gtsqm+a8m0cNGootrqbabIQsAh/aGqJLsv4JD9lTFFWBegsuqnfHlad2ZERA8gKqSJh0mrQS7B4R43w==
  3. Question

    QRT6qnXzZwHFraU2n6Goa3tLvJ8tcmKaEMQZS/SJDi+wTYOHGoKBLhpnSOhbeOC/V3swIDR68PqQeBgSYYnwfXcWitziLlWtinOHwJRXpF2K5fKJ
  4. Question

    WydQZjIZ655Rk2PSAkgjNbzl/l+cp52OjeOiuCUZd5ix1jVnBNGb3ZpgJcb12zw/v8F1juoKj+VG3sC5/jJLalICDdYdDPUJp8936RbrU1caOe7CWjWXkFwARhGpfilkT79lrPZDwoUTyJd+K2gGSnHY9AMC9EKPSJdTDiG98uET/b6FEeF2f4QtyII=