11.6 Infectious diseases spill over from wild species and continue evolving to evade our defenses

344

The infectious diseases that plague human societies emerged from natural ecosystems. Disease epidemics can often be linked to environmental problems and, sometimes, our misguided attempts to solve them.

Ebola, Deforestation, and Bushmeat

On December 26, 2013, an 18-month-old boy in the village of Meliandou, Guinea, came down with a fever, began vomiting, and had bloody stool. Two days later, he was dead. Within a couple of weeks, several members of his family came down with a similar illness, which was later identified as Ebola. By then, the epidemic was in full swing, spreading to the neighboring countries of Sierra Leone and Liberia. As of July 2015, there were 27,678 suspected cases of Ebola and 11,678 deaths, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).

zoonotic disease Any infectious disease that can spread from animals to humans.

bushmeat The butchered meat of wild animals, most commonly from African forests.

Ebola is a zoonotic disease, which is any infectious disease that can spread from animals to humans. According to the U.S. CDC, 6 out of 10 infectious diseases are zoonotic diseases. When humans come in close contact with wild animals through the pet trade or when they kill and butcher wild animals for so-called bushmeat, they are at risk of catching new and emerging zoonotic diseases.

Deforestation in tropical countries also puts humans in closer contact with wild animals. Scientists have found Ebola in chimpanzees, gorillas, antelopes, and porcupines; but, like many zoonotic viruses, they believe the natural reservoir is fruit bats. Although it’s not known exactly how the child in Meliandou caught Ebola in the first place, before he fell ill, he was seen playing near a hollow tree where bats roost. Another human-infecting virus harbored by fruit bats is severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, which resulted in an outbreak in China in 2003 after it spread to a farm where wild civets were being raised for meat. Researchers also suspect that HIV was initially transferred to humans who came in contact with meat from chimpanzees or gorillas.

Evolution Challenges Efforts to Control Malaria

malaria A disease transmitted by mosquitoes that results from infection by a protozoan parasite of the genus Plasmodium; its life cycle uses hosts: mosquitoes and humans.

image

How does a parasitic disease like malaria show the complex relations between environment and infectious disease?

Diseases have evolved over millions of years to persist in species and ecosystems, and our efforts to eliminate them are often foiled by natural selection. One such disease is malaria, which is caused by a protozoan parasite carried by mosquitoes. Scientists have identified more than 100 species of malaria that infect birds, reptiles, and mammals. Six of these species are known to infect humans, primarily in tropical countries where malaria-carrying mosquitoes live. Each year, 300 to 500 million people become infected, and approximately 700,000 people die from the disease. Ninety percent of these cases occur in sub-Saharan Africa, where a child under 5 years of age dies from malaria every minute (Figure 11.15).

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF MALARIA IN 2011
image
FIGURE 11.15 Although once common in temperate parts of the world such as southern Europe and the southern United States, malaria is now found mainly in tropical and subtropical parts of the world. It is especially prevalent in Africa. (After CDC, 2012)

The best weapons we have against malaria after a person has already been infected are antimalarial drugs and pesticides that can reduce infection rates by reducing mosquito populations. However, both malaria parasites and mosquitoes are living organisms, and purely by chance some individuals within a population will be resistant to any new pesticide or antimalarial drug. When a pesticide or antimalarial drug is used, some of the resistant individuals will survive the treatment; those individuals will give rise to a new generation with greater resistance than their parents’ generation. This process repeats itself generation after generation, ultimately rendering the pesticide or antimalarial drug ineffective. Both these evolutionary processes have frustrated efforts to control malaria.

Quinine was an effective antimalarial drug during the 18th and 19th centuries, as European nations established colonies in tropical regions around the world. But by the mid-20th century, resistant strains of malaria in many areas forced quinine to be replaced by chloroquine. Resistance to chloroquine has now become common in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and South America, and attention has turned to a compound called artemisinin, which is extracted from a plant called sweet sage. The first appearance of reduced susceptibility of the malaria parasite to artemisinin was reported in 2011. The team reviewing the international campaign to eradicate malaria wrote: “Losing . . . [artemisinin] to resistance would be a disaster for the control of malaria and would bring eradication efforts to a standstill.”

345

Reports in a 2012 issue of the medical journal The Lancet further emphasized the point: “Antimalarial control efforts are vitally dependent on artemisinin combination treatments. Should these regimens fail, no other drugs are ready for deployment, and drug development efforts are not expected to yield new antimalarials until the end of this decade.”

If the parasite can’t be eliminated, is it possible to eliminate the mosquitoes that transmit the parasite? In the 1950s and 1960s, the WHO conducted an anti-malarial campaign that employed widespread application of DDT, often from trucks that cruised through neighborhoods every evening spraying DDT. Not surprisingly, mosquitoes responded by evolving resistance to DDT, and within a few years the effectiveness of DDT had declined in many parts of the world. Other insecticides replaced DDT, but, in a repetition of the earlier events, targeted mosquito populations are rapidly evolving resistance to the new chemicals.

Think About It

  1. How does a lack of education hinder efforts to stop the spread of zoonotic diseases such as Ebola?

  2. How might malaria control programs be managed to reduce the likelihood that the parasite or vector will evolve resistance?

  3. Why are environmental health scientists concerned about how global warming may affect efforts to control malaria?

11.3–11.6 Issues: Summary

Movement of toxic substances through the environment, persistence, bioaccumulation, and biomagnification add to the potential for harm to humans and other organisms. The use of chemicals such as endocrine disruptors, antibiotics, and pesticides can cause significant harm to the environment and to human health. Endocrine disruptors interfere with a variety of essential metabolic and developmental processes. Alterations of the normal development and function of sex organs are among their more conspicuous effects.

Human factors such as misuse and overuse of antibiotics can increase the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. The use of antibiotics in agriculture, which now far exceeds their use for treating human disease, appears to be a major contributor to the evolution of antibiotic resistance among pathogen populations. When humans come in close contact with wild animals, they are at risk of catching diseases that can spread from animals to people. Studies during the last half of the 20th century have demonstrated repeatedly that pathogens can rapidly evolve resistance to pesticides, antibiotics, and other drugs. As a consequence of our ignoring the evolutionary potential of pathogens, many serious diseases are now resistant to one or several antibiotics.